diff mbox series

platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fix clang unused variable warning

Message ID 20220819174559.4029855-1-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show
Series platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fix clang unused variable warning | expand

Commit Message

Shyam Sundar S K Aug. 19, 2022, 5:45 p.m. UTC
variable 'mode' is used uninitialized whenever switch default is taken
in sps.c which leads to the following clang warning.

---
drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c:96:2: error: variable 'mode' is used uninitialized whenever switch default is taken [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
          default:
          ^~~~~~~
  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c:101:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here
          return mode;
                 ^~~~
  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c:84:9: note: initialize the variable 'mode' to silence this warning
          u8 mode;
                 ^
                  = '\0'
  1 error generated.
---

Fix it by returning -EOPNOTSUPP in default case and also change the return
type of the function amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes() to keep it similar like
other drivers which implement platform_profile.

Fixes: 4c71ae414474 ("platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support SPS PMF feature")
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h |  2 +-
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c | 11 +++++++----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Nathan Chancellor Aug. 19, 2022, 9:46 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Shyam,

On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:15:58PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> variable 'mode' is used uninitialized whenever switch default is taken
> in sps.c which leads to the following clang warning.
> 
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c:96:2: error: variable 'mode' is used uninitialized whenever switch default is taken [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
>           default:
>           ^~~~~~~
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c:101:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here
>           return mode;
>                  ^~~~
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c:84:9: note: initialize the variable 'mode' to silence this warning
>           u8 mode;
>                  ^
>                   = '\0'
>   1 error generated.
> ---
> 
> Fix it by returning -EOPNOTSUPP in default case and also change the return
> type of the function amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes() to keep it similar like
> other drivers which implement platform_profile.
> 
> Fixes: 4c71ae414474 ("platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support SPS PMF feature")
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h |  2 +-
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c | 11 +++++++----
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> index 7613ed2ef6e3..172610f93bd1 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ int amd_pmf_init_metrics_table(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>  int amd_pmf_get_power_source(void);
>  
>  /* SPS Layer */
> -u8 amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf);
> +int amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf);
>  void amd_pmf_update_slider(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, bool op, int idx,
>  			   struct amd_pmf_static_slider_granular *table);
>  int amd_pmf_init_sps(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c
> index 8923e29cc6ca..dba7e36962dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c
> @@ -79,9 +79,9 @@ static int amd_pmf_profile_get(struct platform_profile_handler *pprof,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -u8 amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf)
> +int amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf)
>  {
> -	u8 mode;
> +	int mode;
>  
>  	switch (pmf->current_profile) {
>  	case PLATFORM_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE:
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ u8 amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf)
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		dev_err(pmf->dev, "Unknown Platform Profile.\n");
> -		break;
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  	}
>  
>  	return mode;
> @@ -105,10 +105,13 @@ static int amd_pmf_profile_set(struct platform_profile_handler *pprof,
>  			       enum platform_profile_option profile)
>  {
>  	struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf = container_of(pprof, struct amd_pmf_dev, pprof);
> -	u8 mode;
> +	int mode;
>  
>  	pmf->current_profile = profile;
>  	mode = amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes(pmf);

I see a few other places where amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes() is called.
Should they be updated in this same way to handle a negative return
code?

Regardless, the change is what I envisioned so looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>

Cheers,
Nathan

> +	if (mode < 0)
> +		return mode;
> +
>  	amd_pmf_update_slider(pmf, SLIDER_OP_SET, mode, NULL);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
index 7613ed2ef6e3..172610f93bd1 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@  int amd_pmf_init_metrics_table(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
 int amd_pmf_get_power_source(void);
 
 /* SPS Layer */
-u8 amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf);
+int amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf);
 void amd_pmf_update_slider(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, bool op, int idx,
 			   struct amd_pmf_static_slider_granular *table);
 int amd_pmf_init_sps(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c
index 8923e29cc6ca..dba7e36962dc 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c
@@ -79,9 +79,9 @@  static int amd_pmf_profile_get(struct platform_profile_handler *pprof,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-u8 amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf)
+int amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf)
 {
-	u8 mode;
+	int mode;
 
 	switch (pmf->current_profile) {
 	case PLATFORM_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE:
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@  u8 amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf)
 		break;
 	default:
 		dev_err(pmf->dev, "Unknown Platform Profile.\n");
-		break;
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
 
 	return mode;
@@ -105,10 +105,13 @@  static int amd_pmf_profile_set(struct platform_profile_handler *pprof,
 			       enum platform_profile_option profile)
 {
 	struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf = container_of(pprof, struct amd_pmf_dev, pprof);
-	u8 mode;
+	int mode;
 
 	pmf->current_profile = profile;
 	mode = amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes(pmf);
+	if (mode < 0)
+		return mode;
+
 	amd_pmf_update_slider(pmf, SLIDER_OP_SET, mode, NULL);
 	return 0;
 }