Message ID | 20230401184345.208960-1-mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/2] platform/x86: think-lmi: Fix memory leaks when parsing ThinkStation WMI strings | expand |
On 4/1/23 13:43, Mark Pearson wrote: > My previous commit introduced a memory leak where the item allocated > from tlmi_setting was not freed. > This commit also renames it to avoid confusion with the similarly name > variable in the same function. > > Fixes: 8a02d70679fc ("platform/x86: think-lmi: Add possible_values for ThinkStation") > Reported-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/df26ff45-8933-f2b3-25f4-6ee51ccda7d8@gmx.de/T/ > Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca> > --- > This patch series builds on top of the proposed patch from Armin Wolf > "platform/x86: think-lmi: Fix memory leak when showing current settings" Which version of the patch did you do it from? I tried to apply v3 of Armin's patch to Linus' tree and then apply these two. The first applied, but the second had conflicts. Here was my base (with patch 1 in this series applied). 50c77e3211d7 (HEAD -> master) platform/x86: think-lmi: Fix memory leaks when parsing ThinkStation WMI strings ede629af1e2c platform/x86: think-lmi: Fix memory leak when showing current settings 00c7b5f4ddc5 (origin/master, origin/HEAD) Merge tag 'input-for-v6.3-rc4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input ...... Applying: platform/x86: think-lmi: Clean up display of current_value on Thinkstation error: patch failed: drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c:931 error: drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c: patch does not apply > drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c > index 88da7bcb6ce9..ad952b49617b 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c > @@ -1459,10 +1459,10 @@ static int tlmi_analyze(void) > * name string. > * Try and pull that out if it's available. > */ > - char *item, *optstart, *optend; > + char *optitem, *optstart, *optend; > > - if (!tlmi_setting(setting->index, &item, LENOVO_BIOS_SETTING_GUID)) { > - optstart = strstr(item, "[Optional:"); > + if (!tlmi_setting(setting->index, &optitem, LENOVO_BIOS_SETTING_GUID)) { > + optstart = strstr(optitem, "[Optional:"); > if (optstart) { > optstart += strlen("[Optional:"); > optend = strstr(optstart, "]"); > @@ -1471,6 +1471,7 @@ static int tlmi_analyze(void) > kstrndup(optstart, optend - optstart, > GFP_KERNEL); > } > + kfree(optitem); > } > } > /*
Hi Mario On Sun, Apr 2, 2023, at 10:04 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote: > On 4/1/23 13:43, Mark Pearson wrote: > >> My previous commit introduced a memory leak where the item allocated >> from tlmi_setting was not freed. >> This commit also renames it to avoid confusion with the similarly name >> variable in the same function. >> >> Fixes: 8a02d70679fc ("platform/x86: think-lmi: Add possible_values for ThinkStation") >> Reported-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr> >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/df26ff45-8933-f2b3-25f4-6ee51ccda7d8@gmx.de/T/ >> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca> >> --- >> This patch series builds on top of the proposed patch from Armin Wolf >> "platform/x86: think-lmi: Fix memory leak when showing current settings" > > Which version of the patch did you do it from? I tried to apply v3 of > Armin's patch > to Linus' tree and then apply these two. > > The first applied, but the second had conflicts. Here was my base (with > patch 1 in > this series applied). I was using v2 - but there shouldn't be any code changes between v3 and v2....so I hadn't re-based. I'm working in the fixes branch from pdx86.git (with the aim of making it easier for Hans to pull in the patches). It's possible I've goofed somehow...though not sure how :( I'll go double check - but likely won't be until tomorrow I'm afraid. I should probably just wait for the patch to be accepted and then work from there.... Mark
On 4/2/2023 14:23, Mark Pearson wrote: > Hi Mario > > On Sun, Apr 2, 2023, at 10:04 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote: >> On 4/1/23 13:43, Mark Pearson wrote: >> >>> My previous commit introduced a memory leak where the item allocated >>> from tlmi_setting was not freed. >>> This commit also renames it to avoid confusion with the similarly name >>> variable in the same function. >>> >>> Fixes: 8a02d70679fc ("platform/x86: think-lmi: Add possible_values for ThinkStation") >>> Reported-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr> >>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/df26ff45-8933-f2b3-25f4-6ee51ccda7d8@gmx.de/T/ >>> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca> >>> --- >>> This patch series builds on top of the proposed patch from Armin Wolf >>> "platform/x86: think-lmi: Fix memory leak when showing current settings" >> >> Which version of the patch did you do it from? I tried to apply v3 of >> Armin's patch >> to Linus' tree and then apply these two. >> >> The first applied, but the second had conflicts. Here was my base (with >> patch 1 in >> this series applied). > > I was using v2 - but there shouldn't be any code changes between v3 and v2....so I hadn't re-based. > > I'm working in the fixes branch from pdx86.git (with the aim of making it easier for Hans to pull in the patches). It's possible I've goofed somehow...though not sure how :( > > I'll go double check - but likely won't be until tomorrow I'm afraid. I should probably just wait for the patch to be accepted and then work from there.... > > Mark Hmm, I just tried on platform-x86/for-next. commit e3271a5917d1501089b1a224d702aa053e2877f4 (tag: platform-drivers-x86-v6.3-4, platform-x86/fixes) I get the same problem there. I just applied Armin's single v3 patch and then tried your series.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023, at 6:17 PM, Limonciello, Mario wrote: > On 4/2/2023 14:23, Mark Pearson wrote: >> Hi Mario >> >> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023, at 10:04 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote: >>> On 4/1/23 13:43, Mark Pearson wrote: >>> >>>> My previous commit introduced a memory leak where the item allocated >>>> from tlmi_setting was not freed. >>>> This commit also renames it to avoid confusion with the similarly name >>>> variable in the same function. >>>> >>>> Fixes: 8a02d70679fc ("platform/x86: think-lmi: Add possible_values for ThinkStation") >>>> Reported-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr> >>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/df26ff45-8933-f2b3-25f4-6ee51ccda7d8@gmx.de/T/ >>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca> >>>> --- >>>> This patch series builds on top of the proposed patch from Armin Wolf >>>> "platform/x86: think-lmi: Fix memory leak when showing current settings" >>> >>> Which version of the patch did you do it from? I tried to apply v3 of >>> Armin's patch >>> to Linus' tree and then apply these two. >>> >>> The first applied, but the second had conflicts. Here was my base (with >>> patch 1 in >>> this series applied). >> >> I was using v2 - but there shouldn't be any code changes between v3 and v2....so I hadn't re-based. >> >> I'm working in the fixes branch from pdx86.git (with the aim of making it easier for Hans to pull in the patches). It's possible I've goofed somehow...though not sure how :( >> >> I'll go double check - but likely won't be until tomorrow I'm afraid. I should probably just wait for the patch to be accepted and then work from there.... >> >> Mark > > Hmm, I just tried on platform-x86/for-next. > commit e3271a5917d1501089b1a224d702aa053e2877f4 (tag: > platform-drivers-x86-v6.3-4, platform-x86/fixes) > > I get the same problem there. I just applied Armin's single v3 patch > and then tried your series. You're absolutely right...it doesn't apply if I start again from clean. I have no idea why - it must have been something I did when applying the patch in the first place but I'm at a loss as to what. Urgh :( I'm regenerating the patch and will resend as a v2. Just going to run some tests as a sanity check first. Mark
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c index 88da7bcb6ce9..ad952b49617b 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c @@ -1459,10 +1459,10 @@ static int tlmi_analyze(void) * name string. * Try and pull that out if it's available. */ - char *item, *optstart, *optend; + char *optitem, *optstart, *optend; - if (!tlmi_setting(setting->index, &item, LENOVO_BIOS_SETTING_GUID)) { - optstart = strstr(item, "[Optional:"); + if (!tlmi_setting(setting->index, &optitem, LENOVO_BIOS_SETTING_GUID)) { + optstart = strstr(optitem, "[Optional:"); if (optstart) { optstart += strlen("[Optional:"); optend = strstr(optstart, "]"); @@ -1471,6 +1471,7 @@ static int tlmi_analyze(void) kstrndup(optstart, optend - optstart, GFP_KERNEL); } + kfree(optitem); } } /*
My previous commit introduced a memory leak where the item allocated from tlmi_setting was not freed. This commit also renames it to avoid confusion with the similarly name variable in the same function. Fixes: 8a02d70679fc ("platform/x86: think-lmi: Add possible_values for ThinkStation") Reported-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/df26ff45-8933-f2b3-25f4-6ee51ccda7d8@gmx.de/T/ Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca> --- This patch series builds on top of the proposed patch from Armin Wolf "platform/x86: think-lmi: Fix memory leak when showing current settings" drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)