diff mbox series

[v2,06/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support to get inputs from other subsystems

Message ID 20230930083715.2050863-7-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested, archived
Headers show
Series Introduce PMF Smart PC Solution Builder Feature | expand

Commit Message

Shyam Sundar S K Sept. 30, 2023, 8:37 a.m. UTC
PMF driver sends changing inputs from each subystem to TA for evaluating
the conditions in the policy binary.

Add initial support of plumbing in the PMF driver for Smart PC to get
information from other subsystems in the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile |   2 +-
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  18 ++++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c    | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c |   3 +
 4 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c

Comments

Ilpo Järvinen Oct. 4, 2023, 12:14 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:

> PMF driver sends changing inputs from each subystem to TA for evaluating
> the conditions in the policy binary.
> 
> Add initial support of plumbing in the PMF driver for Smart PC to get
> information from other subsystems in the kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile |   2 +-
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  18 ++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c    | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c |   3 +
>  4 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> index d2746ee7369f..6b26e48ce8ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@
>  obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_PMF) += amd-pmf.o
>  amd-pmf-objs := core.o acpi.o sps.o \
>  		auto-mode.o cnqf.o \
> -		tee-if.o
> +		tee-if.o spc.o
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> index 6f4b6f4ecee4..60b11455dadf 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> @@ -149,6 +149,21 @@ struct smu_pmf_metrics {
>  	u16 infra_gfx_maxfreq; /* in MHz */
>  	u16 skin_temp; /* in centi-Celsius */
>  	u16 device_state;
> +	u16 curtemp; /* in centi-Celsius */
> +	u16 filter_alpha_value;
> +	u16 avg_gfx_clkfrequency;
> +	u16 avg_fclk_frequency;
> +	u16 avg_gfx_activity;
> +	u16 avg_socclk_frequency;
> +	u16 avg_vclk_frequency;
> +	u16 avg_vcn_activity;
> +	u16 avg_dram_reads;
> +	u16 avg_dram_writes;
> +	u16 avg_socket_power;
> +	u16 avg_core_power[2];
> +	u16 avg_core_c0residency[16];
> +	u16 spare1;
> +	u32 metrics_counter;
>  } __packed;
>  
>  enum amd_stt_skin_temp {
> @@ -595,4 +610,7 @@ extern const struct attribute_group cnqf_feature_attribute_group;
>  int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>  void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>  int apmf_check_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
> +
> +/* Smart PC - TA interfaces */
> +void amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in);
>  #endif /* PMF_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3113bde051d9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * AMD Platform Management Framework Driver - Smart PC Capabilities
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> + * All Rights Reserved.
> + *
> + * Authors: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> + *          Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@amd.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <acpi/button.h>
> +#include <linux/power_supply.h>
> +#include <linux/units.h>
> +#include "pmf.h"
> +
> +static void amd_pmf_get_smu_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
> +{
> +	u16 max, avg = 0;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	memset(dev->buf, 0, sizeof(dev->m_table));
> +	amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_TRANSFER_TABLE, 0, 7, NULL);
> +	memcpy(&dev->m_table, dev->buf, sizeof(dev->m_table));
> +
> +	in->ev_info.socket_power = dev->m_table.apu_power + dev->m_table.dgpu_power;
> +	in->ev_info.skin_temperature = dev->m_table.skin_temp;
> +
> +	/* get the avg C0 residency of all the cores */
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++)
> +		avg += dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
> +
> +	/* get the max C0 residency of all the cores */
> +	max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[0];
> +	for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++) {
> +		if (dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i] > max)
> +			max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
> +	}

My comments weren't either answered adequately or changes made here.
Please check the v1 comments. I hope it's not because you feel hurry to 
get the next version out...

I'm still unsure if the u16 thing can overflow because I don't know what's 
the max value for avg_core_c0residency[i].

> +
> +	in->ev_info.avg_c0residency = avg / ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency);
> +	in->ev_info.max_c0residency = max;
> +	in->ev_info.gfx_busy = dev->m_table.avg_gfx_activity;
> +}
> +
> +static const char * const pmf_battery_supply_name[] = {
> +	"BATT",
> +	"BAT0",
> +};
> +
> +static int get_battery_prop(enum power_supply_property prop)
> +{
> +	union power_supply_propval value;
> +	struct power_supply *psy;
> +	int i, ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmf_battery_supply_name); i++) {
> +		psy = power_supply_get_by_name(pmf_battery_supply_name[i]);
> +		if (!psy)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		ret = power_supply_get_property(psy, prop, &value);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			power_supply_put(psy);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return value.intval;
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_pmf_get_battery_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
> +{
> +	int val;
> +
> +	val = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_PRESENT);
> +	if (val != 1)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	in->ev_info.bat_percentage = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY);
> +	/* all values in mWh metrics */
> +	in->ev_info.bat_design = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ENERGY_FULL_DESIGN) / MILLI;
> +	in->ev_info.full_charge_capacity = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ENERGY_FULL) / MILLI;
> +	in->ev_info.drain_rate = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_POWER_NOW) / MILLI;

There are defines specifically for watts so you should use them rather 
than generic MILLI.
Shyam Sundar S K Oct. 9, 2023, 5:20 a.m. UTC | #2
On 10/4/2023 5:44 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> 
>> PMF driver sends changing inputs from each subystem to TA for evaluating
>> the conditions in the policy binary.
>>
>> Add initial support of plumbing in the PMF driver for Smart PC to get
>> information from other subsystems in the kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile |   2 +-
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  18 ++++
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c    | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c |   3 +
>>  4 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
>> index d2746ee7369f..6b26e48ce8ad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
>> @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_PMF) += amd-pmf.o
>>  amd-pmf-objs := core.o acpi.o sps.o \
>>  		auto-mode.o cnqf.o \
>> -		tee-if.o
>> +		tee-if.o spc.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> index 6f4b6f4ecee4..60b11455dadf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> @@ -149,6 +149,21 @@ struct smu_pmf_metrics {
>>  	u16 infra_gfx_maxfreq; /* in MHz */
>>  	u16 skin_temp; /* in centi-Celsius */
>>  	u16 device_state;
>> +	u16 curtemp; /* in centi-Celsius */
>> +	u16 filter_alpha_value;
>> +	u16 avg_gfx_clkfrequency;
>> +	u16 avg_fclk_frequency;
>> +	u16 avg_gfx_activity;
>> +	u16 avg_socclk_frequency;
>> +	u16 avg_vclk_frequency;
>> +	u16 avg_vcn_activity;
>> +	u16 avg_dram_reads;
>> +	u16 avg_dram_writes;
>> +	u16 avg_socket_power;
>> +	u16 avg_core_power[2];
>> +	u16 avg_core_c0residency[16];
>> +	u16 spare1;
>> +	u32 metrics_counter;
>>  } __packed;
>>  
>>  enum amd_stt_skin_temp {
>> @@ -595,4 +610,7 @@ extern const struct attribute_group cnqf_feature_attribute_group;
>>  int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>>  void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>>  int apmf_check_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
>> +
>> +/* Smart PC - TA interfaces */
>> +void amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in);
>>  #endif /* PMF_H */
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..3113bde051d9
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * AMD Platform Management Framework Driver - Smart PC Capabilities
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
>> + * All Rights Reserved.
>> + *
>> + * Authors: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
>> + *          Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@amd.com>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <acpi/button.h>
>> +#include <linux/power_supply.h>
>> +#include <linux/units.h>
>> +#include "pmf.h"
>> +
>> +static void amd_pmf_get_smu_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
>> +{
>> +	u16 max, avg = 0;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	memset(dev->buf, 0, sizeof(dev->m_table));
>> +	amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_TRANSFER_TABLE, 0, 7, NULL);
>> +	memcpy(&dev->m_table, dev->buf, sizeof(dev->m_table));
>> +
>> +	in->ev_info.socket_power = dev->m_table.apu_power + dev->m_table.dgpu_power;
>> +	in->ev_info.skin_temperature = dev->m_table.skin_temp;
>> +
>> +	/* get the avg C0 residency of all the cores */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++)
>> +		avg += dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
>> +
>> +	/* get the max C0 residency of all the cores */
>> +	max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[0];
>> +	for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++) {
>> +		if (dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i] > max)
>> +			max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
>> +	}
> 
> My comments weren't either answered adequately or changes made here.
> Please check the v1 comments. I hope it's not because you feel hurry to 
> get the next version out...
> 
> I'm still unsure if the u16 thing can overflow because I don't know what's 
> the max value for avg_core_c0residency[i].

the highest value for avg_core_c0residency[i] is merely a small number
and hence I retained the avg variable as u16. Not sure if there a
'real' case where it can overflow.

Sorry, I missed to merge both into a single for loop. I will address
this in v3.

Thanks,
Shyam

> 
>> +
>> +	in->ev_info.avg_c0residency = avg / ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency);
>> +	in->ev_info.max_c0residency = max;
>> +	in->ev_info.gfx_busy = dev->m_table.avg_gfx_activity;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const char * const pmf_battery_supply_name[] = {
>> +	"BATT",
>> +	"BAT0",
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int get_battery_prop(enum power_supply_property prop)
>> +{
>> +	union power_supply_propval value;
>> +	struct power_supply *psy;
>> +	int i, ret = -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmf_battery_supply_name); i++) {
>> +		psy = power_supply_get_by_name(pmf_battery_supply_name[i]);
>> +		if (!psy)
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		ret = power_supply_get_property(psy, prop, &value);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			power_supply_put(psy);
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return value.intval;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int amd_pmf_get_battery_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
>> +{
>> +	int val;
>> +
>> +	val = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_PRESENT);
>> +	if (val != 1)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	in->ev_info.bat_percentage = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY);
>> +	/* all values in mWh metrics */
>> +	in->ev_info.bat_design = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ENERGY_FULL_DESIGN) / MILLI;
>> +	in->ev_info.full_charge_capacity = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ENERGY_FULL) / MILLI;
>> +	in->ev_info.drain_rate = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_POWER_NOW) / MILLI;
> 
> There are defines specifically for watts so you should use them rather 
> than generic MILLI.
> 
>
Ilpo Järvinen Oct. 9, 2023, 10:26 a.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> On 10/4/2023 5:44 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> > 
> >> PMF driver sends changing inputs from each subystem to TA for evaluating
> >> the conditions in the policy binary.
> >>
> >> Add initial support of plumbing in the PMF driver for Smart PC to get
> >> information from other subsystems in the kernel.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>

> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..3113bde051d9
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> +/*
> >> + * AMD Platform Management Framework Driver - Smart PC Capabilities
> >> + *
> >> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> >> + * All Rights Reserved.
> >> + *
> >> + * Authors: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> >> + *          Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@amd.com>
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <acpi/button.h>
> >> +#include <linux/power_supply.h>
> >> +#include <linux/units.h>
> >> +#include "pmf.h"
> >> +
> >> +static void amd_pmf_get_smu_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
> >> +{
> >> +	u16 max, avg = 0;
> >> +	int i;
> >> +
> >> +	memset(dev->buf, 0, sizeof(dev->m_table));
> >> +	amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_TRANSFER_TABLE, 0, 7, NULL);
> >> +	memcpy(&dev->m_table, dev->buf, sizeof(dev->m_table));
> >> +
> >> +	in->ev_info.socket_power = dev->m_table.apu_power + dev->m_table.dgpu_power;
> >> +	in->ev_info.skin_temperature = dev->m_table.skin_temp;
> >> +
> >> +	/* get the avg C0 residency of all the cores */
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++)
> >> +		avg += dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
> >> +
> >> +	/* get the max C0 residency of all the cores */
> >> +	max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[0];
> >> +	for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++) {
> >> +		if (dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i] > max)
> >> +			max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
> >> +	}
> > 
> > My comments weren't either answered adequately or changes made here.
> > Please check the v1 comments. I hope it's not because you feel hurry to 
> > get the next version out...
> > 
> > I'm still unsure if the u16 thing can overflow because I don't know what's 
> > the max value for avg_core_c0residency[i].
> 
> the highest value for avg_core_c0residency[i] is merely a small number
> and hence I retained the avg variable as u16. Not sure if there a
> 'real' case where it can overflow.

Okay, if you think it's fine, no problem with it then (not that there's 
a big advantage having it as u16 instead of e.g. unsigned int).

> Sorry, I missed to merge both into a single for loop. I will address
> this in v3.

Thanks.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
index d2746ee7369f..6b26e48ce8ad 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
@@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ 
 obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_PMF) += amd-pmf.o
 amd-pmf-objs := core.o acpi.o sps.o \
 		auto-mode.o cnqf.o \
-		tee-if.o
+		tee-if.o spc.o
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
index 6f4b6f4ecee4..60b11455dadf 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
@@ -149,6 +149,21 @@  struct smu_pmf_metrics {
 	u16 infra_gfx_maxfreq; /* in MHz */
 	u16 skin_temp; /* in centi-Celsius */
 	u16 device_state;
+	u16 curtemp; /* in centi-Celsius */
+	u16 filter_alpha_value;
+	u16 avg_gfx_clkfrequency;
+	u16 avg_fclk_frequency;
+	u16 avg_gfx_activity;
+	u16 avg_socclk_frequency;
+	u16 avg_vclk_frequency;
+	u16 avg_vcn_activity;
+	u16 avg_dram_reads;
+	u16 avg_dram_writes;
+	u16 avg_socket_power;
+	u16 avg_core_power[2];
+	u16 avg_core_c0residency[16];
+	u16 spare1;
+	u32 metrics_counter;
 } __packed;
 
 enum amd_stt_skin_temp {
@@ -595,4 +610,7 @@  extern const struct attribute_group cnqf_feature_attribute_group;
 int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
 void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
 int apmf_check_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
+
+/* Smart PC - TA interfaces */
+void amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in);
 #endif /* PMF_H */
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3113bde051d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * AMD Platform Management Framework Driver - Smart PC Capabilities
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
+ * All Rights Reserved.
+ *
+ * Authors: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
+ *          Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@amd.com>
+ */
+
+#include <acpi/button.h>
+#include <linux/power_supply.h>
+#include <linux/units.h>
+#include "pmf.h"
+
+static void amd_pmf_get_smu_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
+{
+	u16 max, avg = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	memset(dev->buf, 0, sizeof(dev->m_table));
+	amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_TRANSFER_TABLE, 0, 7, NULL);
+	memcpy(&dev->m_table, dev->buf, sizeof(dev->m_table));
+
+	in->ev_info.socket_power = dev->m_table.apu_power + dev->m_table.dgpu_power;
+	in->ev_info.skin_temperature = dev->m_table.skin_temp;
+
+	/* get the avg C0 residency of all the cores */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++)
+		avg += dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
+
+	/* get the max C0 residency of all the cores */
+	max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[0];
+	for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++) {
+		if (dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i] > max)
+			max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
+	}
+
+	in->ev_info.avg_c0residency = avg / ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency);
+	in->ev_info.max_c0residency = max;
+	in->ev_info.gfx_busy = dev->m_table.avg_gfx_activity;
+}
+
+static const char * const pmf_battery_supply_name[] = {
+	"BATT",
+	"BAT0",
+};
+
+static int get_battery_prop(enum power_supply_property prop)
+{
+	union power_supply_propval value;
+	struct power_supply *psy;
+	int i, ret = -EINVAL;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmf_battery_supply_name); i++) {
+		psy = power_supply_get_by_name(pmf_battery_supply_name[i]);
+		if (!psy)
+			continue;
+
+		ret = power_supply_get_property(psy, prop, &value);
+		if (ret) {
+			power_supply_put(psy);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return value.intval;
+}
+
+static int amd_pmf_get_battery_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
+{
+	int val;
+
+	val = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_PRESENT);
+	if (val != 1)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	in->ev_info.bat_percentage = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY);
+	/* all values in mWh metrics */
+	in->ev_info.bat_design = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ENERGY_FULL_DESIGN) / MILLI;
+	in->ev_info.full_charge_capacity = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ENERGY_FULL) / MILLI;
+	in->ev_info.drain_rate = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_POWER_NOW) / MILLI;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int amd_pmf_get_slider_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
+{
+	int val;
+
+	switch (dev->current_profile) {
+	case PLATFORM_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE:
+		val = TA_BEST_PERFORMANCE;
+		break;
+	case PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED:
+		val = TA_BETTER_PERFORMANCE;
+		break;
+	case PLATFORM_PROFILE_LOW_POWER:
+		val = TA_BEST_BATTERY;
+		break;
+	default:
+		dev_err(dev->dev, "Unknown Platform Profile.\n");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+	in->ev_info.power_slider = val;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
+{
+	/* TA side lid open is 1 and close is 0, hence the ! here */
+	in->ev_info.lid_state = !acpi_lid_open();
+	in->ev_info.power_source = amd_pmf_get_power_source();
+	amd_pmf_get_smu_info(dev, in);
+	amd_pmf_get_battery_info(dev, in);
+	amd_pmf_get_slider_info(dev, in);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
index 15aa6e6e1050..1fc3b57f8d78 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@  static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 {
 	struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *ta_sm = NULL;
 	struct ta_pmf_enact_result *out = NULL;
+	struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in = NULL;
 	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM];
 	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -123,11 +124,13 @@  static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 	memset(dev->shbuf, 0, dev->policy_sz);
 	ta_sm = (struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *)dev->shbuf;
 	out = &ta_sm->pmf_output.policy_apply_table;
+	in = &ta_sm->pmf_input.enact_table;
 
 	memset(ta_sm, 0, sizeof(struct ta_pmf_shared_memory));
 	ta_sm->command_id = TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES;
 	ta_sm->if_version = PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR;
 
+	amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(dev, in);
 	amd_pmf_prepare_args(dev, TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES, &arg, param);
 
 	ret = tee_client_invoke_func(dev->tee_ctx, &arg, param);