Message ID | 20240821122233.3761645-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | platform/x86: int3472: A few cleanups | expand |
Le 21/08/2024 à 14:20, Andy Shevchenko a écrit : > Since dev_err_probe() ignores success, Hi, Does it really? It does not seem to be the case (at least on linux-next). Or I miss something obvious? CJ > i.e. 0. we may call > it unconditionally. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c | 5 +---- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c > index 07b302e09340..cd0743300d7f 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c > @@ -289,10 +289,7 @@ static int skl_int3472_handle_gpio_resources(struct acpi_resource *ares, > int3472->ngpios++; > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > - if (ret < 0) > - return dev_err_probe(int3472->dev, ret, err_msg); > - > - return ret; > + return dev_err_probe(int3472->dev, ret, err_msg); > } > > static int skl_int3472_parse_crs(struct int3472_discrete_device *int3472)
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 21/08/2024 à 14:20, Andy Shevchenko a écrit : > > Since dev_err_probe() ignores success, > > Hi, > > Does it really? > It does not seem to be the case (at least on linux-next). Or I miss something > obvious? Yes, you're missing the first patch of the series. :-)
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Since dev_err_probe() ignores success, i.e. 0. we may call > it unconditionally. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c | 5 +---- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c > index 07b302e09340..cd0743300d7f 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c > @@ -289,10 +289,7 @@ static int skl_int3472_handle_gpio_resources(struct acpi_resource *ares, > int3472->ngpios++; > ACPI_FREE(obj); > > - if (ret < 0) > - return dev_err_probe(int3472->dev, ret, err_msg); > - > - return ret; > + return dev_err_probe(int3472->dev, ret, err_msg); > } > > static int skl_int3472_parse_crs(struct int3472_discrete_device *int3472) > Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Le 21/08/2024 à 14:39, Ilpo Järvinen a écrit : > On Wed, 21 Aug 2024, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > >> Le 21/08/2024 à 14:20, Andy Shevchenko a écrit : >>> Since dev_err_probe() ignores success, >> >> Hi, >> >> Does it really? >> It does not seem to be the case (at least on linux-next). Or I miss something >> obvious? > > Yes, you're missing the first patch of the series. :-) > Lol. Sorry for the noise. (* blushing *) CJ
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c index 07b302e09340..cd0743300d7f 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c @@ -289,10 +289,7 @@ static int skl_int3472_handle_gpio_resources(struct acpi_resource *ares, int3472->ngpios++; ACPI_FREE(obj); - if (ret < 0) - return dev_err_probe(int3472->dev, ret, err_msg); - - return ret; + return dev_err_probe(int3472->dev, ret, err_msg); } static int skl_int3472_parse_crs(struct int3472_discrete_device *int3472)
Since dev_err_probe() ignores success, i.e. 0. we may call it unconditionally. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)