diff mbox series

[v5,17/20] ACPI: platform_profile: Check all profile handler to calculate next

Message ID 20241107060254.17615-18-mario.limonciello@amd.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series Add support for binding ACPI platform profile to multiple drivers | expand

Commit Message

Mario Limonciello Nov. 7, 2024, 6:02 a.m. UTC
As multiple platform profile handlers might not all support the same
profile, cycling to the next profile could have a different result
depending on what handler are registered.

Check what is active and supported by all handlers to decide what
to do.

Tested-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
v5:
 * Adjust mutex use
---
 drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Armin Wolf Nov. 7, 2024, 8:58 a.m. UTC | #1
Am 07.11.24 um 07:02 schrieb Mario Limonciello:

> As multiple platform profile handlers might not all support the same
> profile, cycling to the next profile could have a different result
> depending on what handler are registered.
>
> Check what is active and supported by all handlers to decide what
> to do.
>
> Tested-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
> v5:
>   * Adjust mutex use
> ---
>   drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c b/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
> index 7f302ac4d3779..2c466f2d16b42 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
> @@ -411,34 +411,39 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_profile_notify);
>
>   int platform_profile_cycle(void)
>   {
> +	enum platform_profile_option next = PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST;
>   	enum platform_profile_option profile;
> -	enum platform_profile_option next;
> +	unsigned long choices;
>   	int err;
>
>   	if (!class_is_registered(&platform_profile_class))
>   		return -ENODEV;
>
>   	scoped_cond_guard(mutex_intr, return -ERESTARTSYS, &profile_lock) {
> -		if (!cur_profile)
> -			return -ENODEV;
> +		err = class_for_each_device(&platform_profile_class, NULL,
> +					    &profile, _aggregate_profiles);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
>
> -		err = cur_profile->profile_get(cur_profile, &profile);
> +		err = class_for_each_device(&platform_profile_class, NULL,
> +					    &choices, _aggregate_choices);
>   		if (err)
>   			return err;
>
> -		next = find_next_bit_wrap(cur_profile->choices, PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST,
> +		next = find_next_bit_wrap(&choices,
> +					  PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST,
>   					  profile + 1);

Could it be that this would lead to be "custom" profile being selected under some conditions?
Also _aggregate_profiles() expects profile to be initialized with PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST.

Thanks,
Armin Wolf

>
> -		if (WARN_ON(next == PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST))
> -			return -EINVAL;
> +		err = class_for_each_device(&platform_profile_class, NULL, &next,
> +					    _store_class_profile);
>
> -		err = cur_profile->profile_set(cur_profile, next);
>   		if (err)
>   			return err;
>   	}
>
>   	sysfs_notify(acpi_kobj, NULL, "platform_profile");
> -	return 0;
> +
> +	return err;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_profile_cycle);
>
Mario Limonciello Nov. 7, 2024, 10:05 p.m. UTC | #2
On 11/7/2024 02:58, Armin Wolf wrote:
> Am 07.11.24 um 07:02 schrieb Mario Limonciello:
> 
>> As multiple platform profile handlers might not all support the same
>> profile, cycling to the next profile could have a different result
>> depending on what handler are registered.
>>
>> Check what is active and supported by all handlers to decide what
>> to do.
>>
>> Tested-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>> ---
>> v5:
>>   * Adjust mutex use
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c b/drivers/acpi/ 
>> platform_profile.c
>> index 7f302ac4d3779..2c466f2d16b42 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
>> @@ -411,34 +411,39 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_profile_notify);
>>
>>   int platform_profile_cycle(void)
>>   {
>> +    enum platform_profile_option next = PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST;
>>       enum platform_profile_option profile;
>> -    enum platform_profile_option next;
>> +    unsigned long choices;
>>       int err;
>>
>>       if (!class_is_registered(&platform_profile_class))
>>           return -ENODEV;
>>
>>       scoped_cond_guard(mutex_intr, return -ERESTARTSYS, &profile_lock) {
>> -        if (!cur_profile)
>> -            return -ENODEV;
>> +        err = class_for_each_device(&platform_profile_class, NULL,
>> +                        &profile, _aggregate_profiles);
>> +        if (err)
>> +            return err;
>>
>> -        err = cur_profile->profile_get(cur_profile, &profile);
>> +        err = class_for_each_device(&platform_profile_class, NULL,
>> +                        &choices, _aggregate_choices);
>>           if (err)
>>               return err;
>>
>> -        next = find_next_bit_wrap(cur_profile->choices, 
>> PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST,
>> +        next = find_next_bit_wrap(&choices,
>> +                      PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST,
>>                         profile + 1);
> 
> Could it be that this would lead to be "custom" profile being selected 
> under some conditions?

Yeah, you're right.  If all drivers supported custom then this could 
happen.  I'll clear custom like this:

		choices &= ~BIT(PLATFORM_PROFILE_CUSTOM);

> Also _aggregate_profiles() expects profile to be initialized with 
> PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST.

Will correct initialization in platform_profile_cycle() to this.

	enum platform_profile_option profile = PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST;

But this also raises a good point.  If _aggregate_profiles() returns
custom then this should be an error because next profile is undefined.
So I'll catch that like this.
		err = class_for_each_device()
		if (err)
			return err;
		if (profile == PLATFORM_PROFILE_CUSTOM)
			return -EINVAL;
> 
> Thanks,
> Armin Wolf
> 
>>
>> -        if (WARN_ON(next == PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST))
>> -            return -EINVAL;
>> +        err = class_for_each_device(&platform_profile_class, NULL, 
>> &next,
>> +                        _store_class_profile);
>>
>> -        err = cur_profile->profile_set(cur_profile, next);
>>           if (err)
>>               return err;
>>       }
>>
>>       sysfs_notify(acpi_kobj, NULL, "platform_profile");
>> -    return 0;
>> +
>> +    return err;
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_profile_cycle);
>>
Armin Wolf Nov. 8, 2024, 6:10 p.m. UTC | #3
Am 07.11.24 um 23:05 schrieb Mario Limonciello:

> On 11/7/2024 02:58, Armin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 07.11.24 um 07:02 schrieb Mario Limonciello:
>>
>>> As multiple platform profile handlers might not all support the same
>>> profile, cycling to the next profile could have a different result
>>> depending on what handler are registered.
>>>
>>> Check what is active and supported by all handlers to decide what
>>> to do.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> v5:
>>>   * Adjust mutex use
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
>>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c b/drivers/acpi/ 
>>> platform_profile.c
>>> index 7f302ac4d3779..2c466f2d16b42 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
>>> @@ -411,34 +411,39 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_profile_notify);
>>>
>>>   int platform_profile_cycle(void)
>>>   {
>>> +    enum platform_profile_option next = PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST;
>>>       enum platform_profile_option profile;
>>> -    enum platform_profile_option next;
>>> +    unsigned long choices;
>>>       int err;
>>>
>>>       if (!class_is_registered(&platform_profile_class))
>>>           return -ENODEV;
>>>
>>>       scoped_cond_guard(mutex_intr, return -ERESTARTSYS, 
>>> &profile_lock) {
>>> -        if (!cur_profile)
>>> -            return -ENODEV;
>>> +        err = class_for_each_device(&platform_profile_class, NULL,
>>> +                        &profile, _aggregate_profiles);
>>> +        if (err)
>>> +            return err;
>>>
>>> -        err = cur_profile->profile_get(cur_profile, &profile);
>>> +        err = class_for_each_device(&platform_profile_class, NULL,
>>> +                        &choices, _aggregate_choices);
>>>           if (err)
>>>               return err;
>>>
>>> -        next = find_next_bit_wrap(cur_profile->choices, 
>>> PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST,
>>> +        next = find_next_bit_wrap(&choices,
>>> +                      PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST,
>>>                         profile + 1);
>>
>> Could it be that this would lead to be "custom" profile being 
>> selected under some conditions?
>
> Yeah, you're right.  If all drivers supported custom then this could 
> happen.  I'll clear custom like this:
>
>         choices &= ~BIT(PLATFORM_PROFILE_CUSTOM);
>
Sound good to me.

>> Also _aggregate_profiles() expects profile to be initialized with 
>> PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST.
>
> Will correct initialization in platform_profile_cycle() to this.
>
>     enum platform_profile_option profile = PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST;
>
> But this also raises a good point.  If _aggregate_profiles() returns
> custom then this should be an error because next profile is undefined.
> So I'll catch that like this.
>         err = class_for_each_device()
>         if (err)
>             return err;
>         if (profile == PLATFORM_PROFILE_CUSTOM)
>             return -EINVAL;

Good point, please also check if profile == PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST in case no platform profile handlers are currently installed.

Thanks,
Armin Wol

>>
>> Thanks,
>> Armin Wolf
>>
>>>
>>> -        if (WARN_ON(next == PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST))
>>> -            return -EINVAL;
>>> +        err = class_for_each_device(&platform_profile_class, NULL, 
>>> &next,
>>> +                        _store_class_profile);
>>>
>>> -        err = cur_profile->profile_set(cur_profile, next);
>>>           if (err)
>>>               return err;
>>>       }
>>>
>>>       sysfs_notify(acpi_kobj, NULL, "platform_profile");
>>> -    return 0;
>>> +
>>> +    return err;
>>>   }
>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_profile_cycle);
>>>
>
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c b/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
index 7f302ac4d3779..2c466f2d16b42 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
@@ -411,34 +411,39 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_profile_notify);
 
 int platform_profile_cycle(void)
 {
+	enum platform_profile_option next = PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST;
 	enum platform_profile_option profile;
-	enum platform_profile_option next;
+	unsigned long choices;
 	int err;
 
 	if (!class_is_registered(&platform_profile_class))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	scoped_cond_guard(mutex_intr, return -ERESTARTSYS, &profile_lock) {
-		if (!cur_profile)
-			return -ENODEV;
+		err = class_for_each_device(&platform_profile_class, NULL,
+					    &profile, _aggregate_profiles);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
 
-		err = cur_profile->profile_get(cur_profile, &profile);
+		err = class_for_each_device(&platform_profile_class, NULL,
+					    &choices, _aggregate_choices);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 
-		next = find_next_bit_wrap(cur_profile->choices, PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST,
+		next = find_next_bit_wrap(&choices,
+					  PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST,
 					  profile + 1);
 
-		if (WARN_ON(next == PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST))
-			return -EINVAL;
+		err = class_for_each_device(&platform_profile_class, NULL, &next,
+					    _store_class_profile);
 
-		err = cur_profile->profile_set(cur_profile, next);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 	}
 
 	sysfs_notify(acpi_kobj, NULL, "platform_profile");
-	return 0;
+
+	return err;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_profile_cycle);