From patchwork Tue Oct 17 18:21:45 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Limonciello, Mario" X-Patchwork-Id: 10012735 X-Patchwork-Delegate: dvhart@infradead.org Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16E460567 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 18:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92D3289E8 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 18:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id AD04D289E9; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 18:27:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51716289F0 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 18:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760034AbdJQS0a (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2017 14:26:30 -0400 Received: from esa7.dell-outbound.iphmx.com ([68.232.153.96]:22130 "EHLO esa7.dell-outbound.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S937367AbdJQSWG (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2017 14:22:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dell.com; i=@dell.com; q=dns/txt; s=smtpout; t=1508264096; x=1539800096; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=LwxkYByytIYYV6kWAUakq3hH2nERFnYGN0gGd3ioyms=; b=ezcNV8NXuek3j/3VMNLCH7NOYmLXktFkpZkX+9H05pE6jCCVpOaGX8BQ AfLcblr5rnfaV5af11SubvQuKPd6xmkWuI2yX5N9ytHYouXwrGDVo/td/ wmX1T5QJ8Ks+sTN9+Vv3AUuNf6CmVkgEFiWjsupvTy/kwXxg1VMCiLnnC g=; Received: from esa5.dell-outbound2.iphmx.com ([68.232.153.203]) by esa7.dell-outbound.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Oct 2017 13:14:55 -0500 Received: from ausxipps306.us.dell.com ([143.166.148.156]) by esa5.dell-outbound2.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Oct 2017 00:14:34 +0600 X-LoopCount0: from 10.208.86.39 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,391,1503378000"; d="scan'208";a="161471152" X-DLP: DLP_GlobalPCIDSS From: Mario Limonciello To: dvhart@infradead.org, Andy Shevchenko Cc: LKML , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , quasisec@google.com, pali.rohar@gmail.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, mjg59@google.com, hch@lst.de, Greg KH , Alan Cox , Mario Limonciello Subject: [PATCH v9 01/17] platform/x86: wmi: Add new method wmidev_evaluate_method Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:21:45 -0500 Message-Id: <3ee262c740c8ab1fb6adb9c79050c6aefb75596c.1508259916.git.mario.limonciello@dell.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Drivers properly using the wmibus can pass their wmi_device pointer rather than the GUID back to the WMI bus to evaluate the proper methods. Any "new" drivers added that use the WMI bus should use this rather than the old wmi_evaluate_method that would take the GUID. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan Reviewed-by: Pali Rohár --- drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- include/linux/wmi.h | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c index 7a05843aff19..4d73a87c2ddf 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c @@ -200,6 +200,28 @@ static acpi_status wmi_method_enable(struct wmi_block *wblock, int enable) */ acpi_status wmi_evaluate_method(const char *guid_string, u8 instance, u32 method_id, const struct acpi_buffer *in, struct acpi_buffer *out) +{ + struct wmi_block *wblock = NULL; + + if (!find_guid(guid_string, &wblock)) + return AE_ERROR; + return wmidev_evaluate_method(&wblock->dev, instance, method_id, + in, out); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wmi_evaluate_method); + +/** + * wmidev_evaluate_method - Evaluate a WMI method + * @wdev: A wmi bus device from a driver + * @instance: Instance index + * @method_id: Method ID to call + * &in: Buffer containing input for the method call + * &out: Empty buffer to return the method results + * + * Call an ACPI-WMI method + */ +acpi_status wmidev_evaluate_method(struct wmi_device *wdev, u8 instance, + u32 method_id, const struct acpi_buffer *in, struct acpi_buffer *out) { struct guid_block *block = NULL; struct wmi_block *wblock = NULL; @@ -209,9 +231,7 @@ u32 method_id, const struct acpi_buffer *in, struct acpi_buffer *out) union acpi_object params[3]; char method[5] = "WM"; - if (!find_guid(guid_string, &wblock)) - return AE_ERROR; - + wblock = container_of(wdev, struct wmi_block, dev); block = &wblock->gblock; handle = wblock->acpi_device->handle; @@ -246,7 +266,7 @@ u32 method_id, const struct acpi_buffer *in, struct acpi_buffer *out) return status; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wmi_evaluate_method); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wmidev_evaluate_method); static acpi_status __query_block(struct wmi_block *wblock, u8 instance, struct acpi_buffer *out) diff --git a/include/linux/wmi.h b/include/linux/wmi.h index cd0d7734dc49..2cd10c3b89e9 100644 --- a/include/linux/wmi.h +++ b/include/linux/wmi.h @@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ struct wmi_device { bool setable; }; +/* evaluate the ACPI method associated with this device */ +extern acpi_status wmidev_evaluate_method(struct wmi_device *wdev, + u8 instance, u32 method_id, + const struct acpi_buffer *in, + struct acpi_buffer *out); + /* Caller must kfree the result. */ extern union acpi_object *wmidev_block_query(struct wmi_device *wdev, u8 instance);