Message ID | 20190722133347.15122-1-mreitz@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org> Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B72746 for <patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5734428334 for <patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 4BD8F2868D; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:34:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E932328595 for <patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33624 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org>) id 1hpYSD-0006wF-3o for patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:34:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52688) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <mreitz@redhat.com>) id 1hpYS0-0006O9-Uv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:34:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mreitz@redhat.com>) id 1hpYRz-0004nE-Qo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:34:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45672) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mreitz@redhat.com>) id 1hpYRx-0004lB-PV; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:33:57 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1768430833A5; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.40.205.2]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E882219D7B; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:33:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 15:33:42 +0200 Message-Id: <20190722133347.15122-1-mreitz@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.44]); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/5] block: Fixes for concurrent block jobs X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel> List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" <qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP |
Series |
block: Fixes for concurrent block jobs
|
expand
|
Am 22.07.2019 um 15:33 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > I think the patches speak for themselves now. > > (The title of this series alludes to what the iotest added in the final > patch tests.) > > v3: > - Rebased on master > - Added two tests to test-bdrv-drain [Kevin] > - Removed new iotest from auto [Thomas] Thanks, applied to block-next. Kevin