Message ID | 20200121013302.43839-1-joel@jms.id.au (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | aspeed/scu: Implement chip id register | expand |
On 1/21/20 2:33 AM, Joel Stanley wrote: > This implements the chip id register in the SCU for the ast2500 and > ast2600. The first patch is a cleanup to separate out ast2400 and > ast2500 functionality. These patches apply cleanly on top of : [v3,0/5] aspeed: extensions and fixes http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1222667/ Thanks, C. > > Joel Stanley (2): > aspeed/scu: Create separate write callbacks > aspeed/scu: Implement chip ID register > > hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) >
On 1/21/20 2:33 AM, Joel Stanley wrote: > This implements the chip id register in the SCU for the ast2500 and > ast2600. The first patch is a cleanup to separate out ast2400 and > ast2500 functionality. > > Joel Stanley (2): > aspeed/scu: Create separate write callbacks > aspeed/scu: Implement chip ID register > > hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > Hello Peter, I see you have merged patches more recent than this series. Do you plan to take them later on ? They apply correctly on mainline. Thanks, C.
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 09:29, Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> wrote: > > On 1/21/20 2:33 AM, Joel Stanley wrote: > > This implements the chip id register in the SCU for the ast2500 and > > ast2600. The first patch is a cleanup to separate out ast2400 and > > ast2500 functionality. > > > > Joel Stanley (2): > > aspeed/scu: Create separate write callbacks > > aspeed/scu: Implement chip ID register > > > > hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > > > Hello Peter, > > I see you have merged patches more recent than this series. Do you > plan to take them later on ? They apply correctly on mainline. Sorry, these didn't get onto my to-review queue for some reason; I've just put them into target-arm.next. thanks -- PMM