Message ID | 20201201171825.2243775-1-berrange@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=RQL/=FF=nongnu.org=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F82CC64E7A for <qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B253F206E0 for <qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="S4HIHE05" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B253F206E0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:44978 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org>) id 1kk9Js-0005f8-A1 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 12:20:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35664) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <berrange@redhat.com>) id 1kk9IU-0003wt-1t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 12:18:38 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:23294) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <berrange@redhat.com>) id 1kk9IO-00021t-VI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 12:18:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1606843112; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zBwfNvXJQOTT+gigvmBQJupbV6P0/JditukNZ0ssaTM=; b=S4HIHE05q/zEx2qSKcgGRPbvXuNnpK1RuQlFGgw4wMdwe7Bn3MwafepKYwA5T2B6PvfI5j y0rAyicdKnl89b6HNURCw64Jw2CafqXm1GLsMSjneqiOYV2xkXKN2DobQ5pD7YUrL3OX4Q v6c+oYPP4QGt0i2qiiJG1fC/tBgcxLg= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-586-E7Mrk6D8Or-GBndOIhX-iQ-1; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 12:18:30 -0500 X-MC-Unique: E7Mrk6D8Or-GBndOIhX-iQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B54BB185E483; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora.redhat.com (ovpn-115-4.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FCC5D9C2; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:18:26 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= <berrange@redhat.com> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH 00/23] tests/docker: start using libvirt-ci's "lcitool" for dockerfiles Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:18:02 +0000 Message-Id: <20201201171825.2243775-1-berrange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=63.128.21.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -35 X-Spam_score: -3.6 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.497, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel> List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>, =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= <philmd@redhat.com>, =?utf-8?q?Alex?= =?utf-8?q?_Benn=C3=A9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>, =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P=2E_Be?= =?utf-8?q?rrang=C3=A9?= <berrange@redhat.com>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" <qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org> |
Series |
tests/docker: start using libvirt-ci's "lcitool" for dockerfiles
|
expand
|
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 05:18:02PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > The same applies to package lists for VMs, Cirrus CI / Travis CI, and > probably more. > > This problem is not unique to QEMU, libvirt faced the exact same issues > and developed a program called "lcitool" which is part of the libvirt-ci > git repository to reduce the burden in this area. > > https://gitlab.com/libvirt-ci/libvirt-ci/ The above URL doesn't resolve for me; perhaps due to a typo. This works for me: https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt-ci > Despite its name, this repository is not tied to libvirt, and so as well > as the 40+ libvirt git repos, it is also used by the libosinfo and > virt-viewer projects for their CI needs. The idea is that all these > projects can share the burden of libvirt-ci. [...]