mbox series

[RFC,0/3] tests/tcg/ppc64le: fix the build of TCG tests with Clang

Message ID 20220208203145.3844662-1-matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series tests/tcg/ppc64le: fix the build of TCG tests with Clang | expand

Message

Matheus K. Ferst Feb. 8, 2022, 8:31 p.m. UTC
From: Matheus Ferst <matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br>

Based-on: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-01/msg06506.html

As the configuration scripts used -mbig and -mlittle, building PPC tests
with Clang was silently skipped. With the patch to fix these options[1],
"make check-tcg" fails because of build and runtime errors. This patch
series tries to fix some of these problems.

The first patch fixes "tests/tcg/ppc64le/mtfsf.c" by removing the
GCC-only builtins used to emit mtfsf and mffs. We can emit these insns
with inline asm instead.

The second patch addresses differences in the output of float_madds.c.
The __builtin_fmaf used in this test emits fmadds with GCC and xsmaddasp
with LLVM. The first insn had rounding errors fixed in
d04ca895dc7f ("target/ppc: Add helpers for fmadds et al"), we apply
a similar fix to xsmaddasp.

Then we have the build errors of tests/tcg/ppc64le/bcdsub.c. According
to GCC docs[2], the '-mpower8-vector' flag provides some bcdsub
builtins, so it'd be reasonable to assume that the rest of the toolchain
knows about the insn if the compiler accepts this flag. Clang supports
this flag since version 3.6[3], but the insn and builtins were only
added in LLVM 14[4]. I couldn't find a good solution. Should we write a
test to check for this insn at configuration time? Should we detect the
compiler at build time and emit the insns with ".long" and fixed
registers?

Even building with Clang 14, the test will fail in runtime because
LLVM doesn't like "__int128" in inline asm. No error or warning is
emitted, but the generated code only loads one doubleword of the VSR.
The third patch of this series avoids this issue by using a vector
type for VSR values.

Finally, it seems that the insns tested by
tests/tcg/ppc64le/byte_reverse.c are not yet supported by LLVM. Since
the configuration script uses '-mpower10' to check for POWER10 support
and Clang doesn't support this flag, "make check-tcg" doesn't fail. We
should probably change this check in the future, but since LLVM support
of POWER10 seems incomplete, I guess we can leave it for now.

[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-01/msg06506.html
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-8.3.0/gcc/PowerPC-AltiVec_002fVSX-Built-in-Functions.html
[3] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/59eb767e11d4ffefb5f55409524e5c8416b2b0db
[4] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c933c2eb334660c131f4afc9d194fafb0cec0423

Matheus Ferst (3):
  tests/tcg/ppc64le: use inline asm instead of __builtin_mtfsf
  target/ppc: change xs[n]madd[am]sp to use float64r32_muladd
  tests/tcg/ppc64le: Use vector types instead of __int128

 target/ppc/fpu_helper.c    | 54 ++++++++--------------
 tests/tcg/ppc64le/bcdsub.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 tests/tcg/ppc64le/mtfsf.c  | 19 ++++----
 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)

Comments

Cédric Le Goater Feb. 9, 2022, 12:31 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello Matheus,

[ Adding Miroslav ]

On 2/8/22 21:31, matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br wrote:
> From: Matheus Ferst <matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br>
> 
> Based-on: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-01/msg06506.html
> 
> As the configuration scripts used -mbig and -mlittle, building PPC tests
> with Clang was silently skipped. With the patch to fix these options[1],
> "make check-tcg" fails because of build and runtime errors. This patch
> series tries to fix some of these problems.
> 
> The first patch fixes "tests/tcg/ppc64le/mtfsf.c" by removing the
> GCC-only builtins used to emit mtfsf and mffs. We can emit these insns
> with inline asm instead.
> 
> The second patch addresses differences in the output of float_madds.c.
> The __builtin_fmaf used in this test emits fmadds with GCC and xsmaddasp
> with LLVM. The first insn had rounding errors fixed in
> d04ca895dc7f ("target/ppc: Add helpers for fmadds et al"), we apply
> a similar fix to xsmaddasp.
> 
> Then we have the build errors of tests/tcg/ppc64le/bcdsub.c. According
> to GCC docs[2], the '-mpower8-vector' flag provides some bcdsub
> builtins, so it'd be reasonable to assume that the rest of the toolchain
> knows about the insn if the compiler accepts this flag. Clang supports
> this flag since version 3.6[3], but the insn and builtins were only
> added in LLVM 14[4]. I couldn't find a good solution. Should we write a
> test to check for this insn at configuration time? Should we detect the
> compiler at build time and emit the insns with ".long" and fixed
> registers?
> 
> Even building with Clang 14, the test will fail in runtime because
> LLVM doesn't like "__int128" in inline asm. No error or warning is
> emitted, but the generated code only loads one doubleword of the VSR.
> The third patch of this series avoids this issue by using a vector
> type for VSR values.
> 
> Finally, it seems that the insns tested by
> tests/tcg/ppc64le/byte_reverse.c are not yet supported by LLVM. Since
> the configuration script uses '-mpower10' to check for POWER10 support
> and Clang doesn't support this flag, "make check-tcg" doesn't fail. We
> should probably change this check in the future, but since LLVM support
> of POWER10 seems incomplete, I guess we can leave it for now.

gitlab didn't spot any issues with the 4 patches applied. Should we merge
all patches :

   Use long endian options for ppc64
   tests/tcg/ppc64le: Use vector types instead of __int128
   target/ppc: change xs[n]madd[am]sp to use float64r32_muladd
   tests/tcg/ppc64le: use inline asm instead of __builtin_mtfsf

and see how we can address the LLVM support for P10 later ?

Thanks,

C.
  
> [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-01/msg06506.html
> [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-8.3.0/gcc/PowerPC-AltiVec_002fVSX-Built-in-Functions.html
> [3] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/59eb767e11d4ffefb5f55409524e5c8416b2b0db
> [4] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c933c2eb334660c131f4afc9d194fafb0cec0423
> 
> Matheus Ferst (3):
>    tests/tcg/ppc64le: use inline asm instead of __builtin_mtfsf
>    target/ppc: change xs[n]madd[am]sp to use float64r32_muladd
>    tests/tcg/ppc64le: Use vector types instead of __int128
> 
>   target/ppc/fpu_helper.c    | 54 ++++++++--------------
>   tests/tcg/ppc64le/bcdsub.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>   tests/tcg/ppc64le/mtfsf.c  | 19 ++++----
>   3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
>
Richard Henderson Feb. 10, 2022, 11:06 p.m. UTC | #2
On 2/9/22 07:31, matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br wrote:
> The second patch addresses differences in the output of float_madds.c.
> The __builtin_fmaf used in this test emits fmadds with GCC and xsmaddasp
> with LLVM. The first insn had rounding errors fixed in
> d04ca895dc7f ("target/ppc: Add helpers for fmadds et al"), we apply
> a similar fix to xsmaddasp.

Thanks for this.  I missed those before.

There are a number of other missed vector cases, which you may have seen.
Basically, anything with "r2sp" needs updating.


r~
Matheus K. Ferst Feb. 11, 2022, 8:22 p.m. UTC | #3
On 09/02/2022 09:31, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> Hello Matheus,
> 
> [ Adding Miroslav ]
> 
> On 2/8/22 21:31, matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br wrote:
>> From: Matheus Ferst <matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br>
>>
>> Based-on: 
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-01/msg06506.html
>>
>> As the configuration scripts used -mbig and -mlittle, building PPC tests
>> with Clang was silently skipped. With the patch to fix these options[1],
>> "make check-tcg" fails because of build and runtime errors. This patch
>> series tries to fix some of these problems.
>>
>> The first patch fixes "tests/tcg/ppc64le/mtfsf.c" by removing the
>> GCC-only builtins used to emit mtfsf and mffs. We can emit these insns
>> with inline asm instead.
>>
>> The second patch addresses differences in the output of float_madds.c.
>> The __builtin_fmaf used in this test emits fmadds with GCC and xsmaddasp
>> with LLVM. The first insn had rounding errors fixed in
>> d04ca895dc7f ("target/ppc: Add helpers for fmadds et al"), we apply
>> a similar fix to xsmaddasp.
>>
>> Then we have the build errors of tests/tcg/ppc64le/bcdsub.c. According
>> to GCC docs[2], the '-mpower8-vector' flag provides some bcdsub
>> builtins, so it'd be reasonable to assume that the rest of the toolchain
>> knows about the insn if the compiler accepts this flag. Clang supports
>> this flag since version 3.6[3], but the insn and builtins were only
>> added in LLVM 14[4]. I couldn't find a good solution. Should we write a
>> test to check for this insn at configuration time? Should we detect the
>> compiler at build time and emit the insns with ".long" and fixed
>> registers?
>>
>> Even building with Clang 14, the test will fail in runtime because
>> LLVM doesn't like "__int128" in inline asm. No error or warning is
>> emitted, but the generated code only loads one doubleword of the VSR.
>> The third patch of this series avoids this issue by using a vector
>> type for VSR values.
>>
>> Finally, it seems that the insns tested by
>> tests/tcg/ppc64le/byte_reverse.c are not yet supported by LLVM. Since
>> the configuration script uses '-mpower10' to check for POWER10 support
>> and Clang doesn't support this flag, "make check-tcg" doesn't fail. We
>> should probably change this check in the future, but since LLVM support
>> of POWER10 seems incomplete, I guess we can leave it for now.
> 
> gitlab didn't spot any issues with the 4 patches applied.


AFAICT, CI wouldn't run into this kind of problem because we don't have 
PPC runners, and the cross-compiler containers use GCC.

> Should we merge all patches :
> 
>    Use long endian options for ppc64
>    tests/tcg/ppc64le: Use vector types instead of __int128
>    target/ppc: change xs[n]madd[am]sp to use float64r32_muladd
>    tests/tcg/ppc64le: use inline asm instead of __builtin_mtfsf
> 
> and see how we can address the LLVM support for P10 later ?
> 

The problems with bcdsub.c are not resolved for Clang < 14, but I guess 
it's ok to merge anyway.

Thanks,
Matheus K. Ferst
Instituto de Pesquisas ELDORADO <http://www.eldorado.org.br/>
Analista de Software
Aviso Legal - Disclaimer <https://www.eldorado.org.br/disclaimer.html>