Message ID | 20230601115139.196369-1-pbonzini@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | block: remove separate bdrv_file_open callback | expand |
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 01:51:36PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > The value of the bdrv_file_open is sometimes checked to distinguish > protocol and format drivers, but apart from that there is no difference > between bdrv_file_open and bdrv_open. > > However, they can all be distinguished by the non-NULL .protocol_name > member. Change the checks to use .protocol_name instead of .bdrv_file_open, > and unify the two callbacks. > > Paolo > > v1->v2: fix bisectability > > Paolo Bonzini (3): > block: make assertion more generic > block: do not check bdrv_file_open > block: remove separate bdrv_file_open callback Series: Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>