| Message ID | 20231106114500.5269-1-philmd@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | target/s390x/cpu: Restrict CPUS390XState declaration to 'cpu.h' | expand |
On 06/11/2023 12.44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > In order to restrict CPUS390XState declaration to "cpu.h" (both > target-specific): > - have the following prototypes take a S390CPU* instead: > . css_do_sic() > . sclp_service_call() > . sclp_service_call_protected() > - restrict cpu_get_tb_cpu_state() definition to TCG > > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (4): > hw/s390x/css: Have css_do_sic() take S390CPU instead of CPUS390XState > hw/s390x/sclp: Have sclp_service_call[_protected]() take S390CPU* > target/s390x/cpu: Restrict cpu_get_tb_cpu_state() definition to TCG > target/s390x/cpu: Restrict CPUS390XState declaration to 'cpu.h' Patches look reasonable. Thanks, queued them now! Thomas
On 06/11/2023 12.44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > In order to restrict CPUS390XState declaration to "cpu.h" (both > target-specific): > - have the following prototypes take a S390CPU* instead: > . css_do_sic() > . sclp_service_call() > . sclp_service_call_protected() > - restrict cpu_get_tb_cpu_state() definition to TCG > > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (4): > hw/s390x/css: Have css_do_sic() take S390CPU instead of CPUS390XState > hw/s390x/sclp: Have sclp_service_call[_protected]() take S390CPU* > target/s390x/cpu: Restrict cpu_get_tb_cpu_state() definition to TCG > target/s390x/cpu: Restrict CPUS390XState declaration to 'cpu.h' > > include/hw/s390x/css.h | 2 +- > include/hw/s390x/sclp.h | 5 ++--- > target/s390x/cpu-qom.h | 2 -- > target/s390x/cpu.h | 11 ++++++++--- > hw/s390x/css.c | 3 ++- > hw/s390x/sclp.c | 7 ++++--- > target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c | 4 ++-- > target/s390x/tcg/misc_helper.c | 5 +++-- > 8 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > FWIW: Series: Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
On 7/11/23 11:44, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 06/11/2023 12.44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> In order to restrict CPUS390XState declaration to "cpu.h" (both >> target-specific): >> - have the following prototypes take a S390CPU* instead: >> . css_do_sic() >> . sclp_service_call() >> . sclp_service_call_protected() >> - restrict cpu_get_tb_cpu_state() definition to TCG >> >> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (4): >> hw/s390x/css: Have css_do_sic() take S390CPU instead of CPUS390XState >> hw/s390x/sclp: Have sclp_service_call[_protected]() take S390CPU* >> target/s390x/cpu: Restrict cpu_get_tb_cpu_state() definition to TCG >> target/s390x/cpu: Restrict CPUS390XState declaration to 'cpu.h' > > Patches look reasonable. Thanks, queued them now! Thanks, since I wasn't sure the series would be reviewed in time for soft freeze, I didn't mention it would be more convenient for me to take it via my hw-misc tree. Since you kindly reviewed it, I'll take it :) Thanks! Phil.
On 07/11/2023 13.12, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 7/11/23 11:44, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 06/11/2023 12.44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>> In order to restrict CPUS390XState declaration to "cpu.h" (both >>> target-specific): >>> - have the following prototypes take a S390CPU* instead: >>> . css_do_sic() >>> . sclp_service_call() >>> . sclp_service_call_protected() >>> - restrict cpu_get_tb_cpu_state() definition to TCG >>> >>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (4): >>> hw/s390x/css: Have css_do_sic() take S390CPU instead of CPUS390XState >>> hw/s390x/sclp: Have sclp_service_call[_protected]() take S390CPU* >>> target/s390x/cpu: Restrict cpu_get_tb_cpu_state() definition to TCG >>> target/s390x/cpu: Restrict CPUS390XState declaration to 'cpu.h' >> >> Patches look reasonable. Thanks, queued them now! > > Thanks, since I wasn't sure the series would be reviewed in time for > soft freeze, I didn't mention it would be more convenient for me to > take it via my hw-misc tree. Since you kindly reviewed it, I'll take > it :) Thanks! All right, I'll drop them from my queue again then. Thomas