Message ID | 20240307153710.30907-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | physmem: Fix MemoryRegion for second access to cached MMIO Address Space | expand |
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:37:06PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > v2: (Thanks to Peter Xu for reviewing!) > - New patch 1 to rename addr1 to mr_addr in the interests of meaningful naming. > - Take advantage of a cached address space only allow for a single MR to simplify > the new code. > - Various cleanups of indentation etc. > - Cover letter and some patch descriptions updated to reflect changes. > - Changes all called out in specific patches. All look good to me, thanks. Having the new functions' first argument as MemTxAttrs is slightly weird to me, but that's not a big deal and we can clean it up later if wanted. I guess it's good to fix this in 9.0 first as it's a real bug even if not trivial to hit. I queued it in my migration tree (with my "memory API" hat..). I won't send a pull until next Monday. Please shoot if there's any objections!
On 08.03.24 08:36, Peter Xu wrote: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:37:06PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> v2: (Thanks to Peter Xu for reviewing!) >> - New patch 1 to rename addr1 to mr_addr in the interests of meaningful naming. >> - Take advantage of a cached address space only allow for a single MR to simplify >> the new code. >> - Various cleanups of indentation etc. >> - Cover letter and some patch descriptions updated to reflect changes. >> - Changes all called out in specific patches. > > All look good to me, thanks. Having the new functions' first argument as > MemTxAttrs is slightly weird to me, but that's not a big deal and we can > clean it up later if wanted. I guess it's good to fix this in 9.0 first as > it's a real bug even if not trivial to hit. > > I queued it in my migration tree (with my "memory API" hat..). > > I won't send a pull until next Monday. Please shoot if there's any objections! > Works for me, thanks!
On 8/3/24 08:36, Peter Xu wrote: > I queued it in my migration tree (with my "memory API" hat..). > > I won't send a pull until next Monday. Please shoot if there's any objections! Thanks!