Message ID | 20240603193622.47156-1-john.allen@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Fix MCE handling on AMD hosts | expand |
Queued, thanks. I added a note to the commit message in the third patch: By the time the MCE reaches the guest, the overflow has been handled by the host and has not caused a shutdown, so include the bit unconditionally. Advertising of SUCCOR and OVERFLOW_RECOV in KVM would still be nice. :) Paolo
On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 11:09:05AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Queued, thanks. I added a note to the commit message in the third patch: Thanks, Paolo! > > By the time the MCE reaches the guest, the overflow has been handled > by the host and has not caused a shutdown, so include the bit unconditionally. I'm not sure I understand this additional comment. Is this talking about the case where the host gets an overflow? If so, yes, if the host has overflow recovery supported, it should handle the overflow and won't require any overflow recovery on the part of the guest. For clarity, it may be nice to prefix the above statement with something like: "In the case of a host overflow, ..." If we're going to bring up the host overflow case, it may be worth clarifying further that host overflows should not propagate to the guest and this patch is specifically intended to allow the guest to handle overflows in the MCEs that are injected from qemu. > > Advertising of SUCCOR and OVERFLOW_RECOV in KVM would still be nice. :) Sure, I will send a series for this. Thanks, John