mbox series

[0/1] Adding TPM support for ARM SBSA-Ref machine

Message ID 20250225074133.6827-1-kuqin12@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Adding TPM support for ARM SBSA-Ref machine | expand

Message

Kun Qin Feb. 25, 2025, 7:41 a.m. UTC
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2625

This change intends to support an ARM64 server like platform that has TPM
support to unlock more power for sbsa_ref.

The idea is to add a TPM create routine during sbsa machine initialization.
The backend can be the same as the rest of TPM support, by using swtpm.

Sign-off-by: Kun Qin <kuqin12@gmail.com>

Kun Qin (1):
  hw/arm/sbsa-ref: Adding TPM support for ARM SBSA-Ref machine

 hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

Comments

Peter Maydell March 3, 2025, 2:33 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 at 07:41, Kun Qin <kuqin12@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2625
>
> This change intends to support an ARM64 server like platform that has TPM
> support to unlock more power for sbsa_ref.
>
> The idea is to add a TPM create routine during sbsa machine initialization.
> The backend can be the same as the rest of TPM support, by using swtpm.
>
> Sign-off-by: Kun Qin <kuqin12@gmail.com>
>
> Kun Qin (1):
>   hw/arm/sbsa-ref: Adding TPM support for ARM SBSA-Ref machine
>
>  hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

By the way, single patches don't need a separate cover letter
email; only multi-patch series should have the cover letter.
This isn't a big deal, but the cover letter on a single patch
seems to confuse some of our tooling, unfortunately, e.g.
patchew fails to find the patch email:
https://patchew.org/QEMU/20250225074133.6827-1-kuqin12@gmail.com/

-- PMM