From patchwork Mon Mar 10 02:35:23 2025 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Chao Liu X-Patchwork-Id: 14009177 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12883C28B2F for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 02:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1trT1Y-0003dz-GQ; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 22:37:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1trT1V-0003dA-4k; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 22:37:45 -0400 Received: from out28-197.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.28.197]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1trT1S-0003QR-Sz; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 22:37:44 -0400 Received: from TC-DZ-03-0020.tc.local(mailfrom:lc00631@tecorigin.com fp:SMTPD_---.booCGZK_1741574245 cluster:ay29) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:37:29 +0800 From: Chao Liu To: alistair23@gmail.com Cc: alistair.francis@wdc.com, bmeng.cn@gmail.com, dbarboza@ventanamicro.com, lc00631@tecorigin.com, liwei1518@gmail.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com, zqz00548@tecorigin.com Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] Enhanced VSTART and VL checks for vector instructions Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:35:23 +0800 Message-ID: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.0.windows.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=115.124.28.197; envelope-from=lc00631@tecorigin.com; helo=out28-197.mail.aliyun.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Hi, Alistair: I rebase both patches based on the riscv-to-apply.next branch and tested them. https://github.com/alistair23/qemu/tree/riscv-to-apply.next Only the first patch had two conflicts, which were resolved nicely, and the second patch rebased fine, so you can review it again if necessary, thanks! PATCH v3 review: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/71f15782-ec28-4763-8197-c10ec12811ec@ventanamicro.com/ PATCH v2 review: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/61e8f7d8-607a-4d63-b9dd-cfbfc840716e@ventanamicro.com/ PATCH v1 review: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/CAKmqyKPFYxhK8PANOVzV3FMWxd79wZSJYLWkKOAgEMt_b2KvZA@mail.gmail.com/ --- Regards, Chao Chao Liu (2): target/riscv: refactor VSTART_CHECK_EARLY_EXIT() to accept vl as a parameter target/riscv: fix handling of nop for vstart >= vl in some vector instruction target/riscv/vcrypto_helper.c | 32 ++++++------- target/riscv/vector_helper.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- target/riscv/vector_internals.c | 4 +- target/riscv/vector_internals.h | 12 ++--- 4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)