Message ID | 1385265352-40801-1-git-send-email-sochin.jiang@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Sun 24 Nov 2013 04:55:52 AM CET, sochin.jiang wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^ I guess the date in your computer is wrong :-) > commit 7ca7f0 moves the throttling related part of the BDS life cycle > management to BlockBackend, adds call to > throttle_timers_detach_aio_context in blk_remove_bs. commit 1606e > remove a block device from its throttle group in blk_delete by calling > blk_io_limits_disable, this fix an easily reproducible qemu crash. But > delete a BB without a BDS inserted could easily cause a qemu crash too > by calling bdrv_drained_begin in blk_io_limits_disable. Say, a simply > drive_add and then a drive_del command. Thanks, I can reproduce this easily by running QEMU and doing drive_add 0 if=none,throttling.iops-total=5000 followed by drive_del none0 > void bdrv_drained_begin(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > + if (!bs) { > + return; > + } > + > if (qemu_in_coroutine()) { > bdrv_co_yield_to_drain(bs, true); > return; > @@ -284,6 +288,10 @@ void bdrv_drained_begin(BlockDriverState *bs) > > void bdrv_drained_end(BlockDriverState *bs) > { > + if (!bs) { > + return; > + } > + I'd say that if someone calls bdrv_drained_begin() with a NULL pointer then the problem is in the caller... > static void throttle_timer_destroy(QEMUTimer **timer) > { > - assert(*timer != NULL); > - > timer_del(*timer); > timer_free(*timer); > *timer = NULL; > @@ -258,7 +256,9 @@ void throttle_timers_detach_aio_context(ThrottleTimers *tt) > int i; > > for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { > - throttle_timer_destroy(&tt->timers[i]); > + if (tt->timers[i]) { > + throttle_timer_destroy(&tt->timers[i]); > + } > } > } Why is this part necessary? In what situation you end up calling throttle_timers_detach_aio_context() twice? Berto
Thanks for replying. Indeed, the problem comes from the caller. I guest some code should be reconsidered in blk_remove_bs and blk_delete, especially with throttling. Secondly, when handling drive_del in hmp_drive_del, throttle_timers_detach_aio_context() is called first time in blk_remove_bs and again throughing blk_unref, see below: hmp_drive_del-> blk_remove_bs-> *throttle_timers_detach_aio_context*-> ... blk_unref-> blk_delete-> blk_io_limits_disable-> throttle_group_unregister_tgm-> throttle_timers_destroy-> *throttle_timers_detach_aio_context*->**...** sochin . On 2017/10/20 19:43, Alberto Garcia wrote: > On Sun 24 Nov 2013 04:55:52 AM CET, sochin.jiang wrote: > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > I guess the date in your computer is wrong :-) > >> commit 7ca7f0 moves the throttling related part of the BDS life cycle >> management to BlockBackend, adds call to >> throttle_timers_detach_aio_context in blk_remove_bs. commit 1606e >> remove a block device from its throttle group in blk_delete by calling >> blk_io_limits_disable, this fix an easily reproducible qemu crash. But >> delete a BB without a BDS inserted could easily cause a qemu crash too >> by calling bdrv_drained_begin in blk_io_limits_disable. Say, a simply >> drive_add and then a drive_del command. > Thanks, I can reproduce this easily by running QEMU and doing > > drive_add 0 if=none,throttling.iops-total=5000 > > followed by > > drive_del none0 > >> void bdrv_drained_begin(BlockDriverState *bs) >> { >> + if (!bs) { >> + return; >> + } >> + >> if (qemu_in_coroutine()) { >> bdrv_co_yield_to_drain(bs, true); >> return; >> @@ -284,6 +288,10 @@ void bdrv_drained_begin(BlockDriverState *bs) >> >> void bdrv_drained_end(BlockDriverState *bs) >> { >> + if (!bs) { >> + return; >> + } >> + > I'd say that if someone calls bdrv_drained_begin() with a NULL pointer > then the problem is in the caller... > >> static void throttle_timer_destroy(QEMUTimer **timer) >> { >> - assert(*timer != NULL); >> - >> timer_del(*timer); >> timer_free(*timer); >> *timer = NULL; >> @@ -258,7 +256,9 @@ void throttle_timers_detach_aio_context(ThrottleTimers *tt) >> int i; >> >> for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { >> - throttle_timer_destroy(&tt->timers[i]); >> + if (tt->timers[i]) { >> + throttle_timer_destroy(&tt->timers[i]); >> + } >> } >> } > Why is this part necessary? In what situation you end up calling > throttle_timers_detach_aio_context() twice? > > Berto > > . >
diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c index 0854e0f..c411a87 100644 --- a/block/io.c +++ b/block/io.c @@ -269,6 +269,10 @@ static void coroutine_fn bdrv_co_yield_to_drain(BlockDriverState *bs, void bdrv_drained_begin(BlockDriverState *bs) { + if (!bs) { + return; + } + if (qemu_in_coroutine()) { bdrv_co_yield_to_drain(bs, true); return; @@ -284,6 +288,10 @@ void bdrv_drained_begin(BlockDriverState *bs) void bdrv_drained_end(BlockDriverState *bs) { + if (!bs) { + return; + } + if (qemu_in_coroutine()) { bdrv_co_yield_to_drain(bs, false); return; diff --git a/util/throttle.c b/util/throttle.c index b38e742..35a21fc 100644 --- a/util/throttle.c +++ b/util/throttle.c @@ -245,8 +245,6 @@ void throttle_timers_init(ThrottleTimers *tt, /* destroy a timer */ static void throttle_timer_destroy(QEMUTimer **timer) { - assert(*timer != NULL); - timer_del(*timer); timer_free(*timer); *timer = NULL; @@ -258,7 +256,9 @@ void throttle_timers_detach_aio_context(ThrottleTimers *tt) int i; for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { - throttle_timer_destroy(&tt->timers[i]); + if (tt->timers[i]) { + throttle_timer_destroy(&tt->timers[i]); + } } }