@@ -253,6 +253,47 @@ static void bdrv_drain_recurse(BlockDriverState *bs)
}
}
+typedef struct {
+ Coroutine *co;
+ BlockDriverState *bs;
+ QEMUBH *bh;
+ bool done;
+} BdrvCoDrainData;
+
+static void bdrv_co_drain_bh_cb(void *opaque)
+{
+ BdrvCoDrainData *data = opaque;
+ Coroutine *co = data->co;
+
+ qemu_bh_delete(data->bh);
+ bdrv_drain(data->bs);
+ data->done = true;
+ qemu_coroutine_enter(co, NULL);
+}
+
+void coroutine_fn bdrv_co_drain(BlockDriverState *bs)
+{
+ BdrvCoDrainData data;
+
+ /* Calling bdrv_drain() from a BH ensures the current coroutine yields and
+ * other coroutines run if they were queued from
+ * qemu_co_queue_run_restart(). */
+
+ assert(qemu_in_coroutine());
+ data = (BdrvCoDrainData) {
+ .co = qemu_coroutine_self(),
+ .bs = bs,
+ .done = false,
+ .bh = aio_bh_new(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs), bdrv_co_drain_bh_cb, &data),
+ };
+ qemu_bh_schedule(data.bh);
+
+ qemu_coroutine_yield();
+ /* If we are resumed from some other event (such as an aio completion or a
+ * timer callback), it is a bug in the caller that should be fixed. */
+ assert(data.done);
+}
+
/*
* Wait for pending requests to complete on a single BlockDriverState subtree,
* and suspend block driver's internal I/O until next request arrives.
@@ -269,6 +310,10 @@ void bdrv_drain(BlockDriverState *bs)
bool busy = true;
bdrv_drain_recurse(bs);
+ if (qemu_in_coroutine()) {
+ bdrv_co_drain(bs);
+ return;
+ }
while (busy) {
/* Keep iterating */
bdrv_flush_io_queue(bs);
@@ -372,6 +372,7 @@ int bdrv_flush(BlockDriverState *bs);
int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_flush(BlockDriverState *bs);
void bdrv_close_all(void);
void bdrv_drain(BlockDriverState *bs);
+void coroutine_fn bdrv_co_drain(BlockDriverState *bs);
void bdrv_drain_all(void);
int bdrv_discard(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors);