diff mbox

[v2,04/17] nbd: Allow larger requests

Message ID 1465939839-30097-5-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Eric Blake June 14, 2016, 9:30 p.m. UTC
The NBD layer was breaking up request at a limit of 2040 sectors
(just under 1M) to cater to old qemu-nbd. But the server limit
was raised to 32M in commit 2d8214885 to match the kernel, more
than three years ago; and the upstream NBD Protocol is proposing
documentation that without any explicit communication to state
otherwise, a client should be able to safely assume that a 32M
transaction will work.  It is time to rely on the larger sizing,
and any downstream distro that cares about maximum
interoperability to older qemu-nbd servers can just tweak the
value of #define NBD_MAX_SECTORS.

Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

---
v2: new patch
---
 include/block/nbd.h | 1 +
 block/nbd-client.c  | 4 ----
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Paolo Bonzini June 15, 2016, 1:37 p.m. UTC | #1
On 14/06/2016 23:30, Eric Blake wrote:
> The NBD layer was breaking up request at a limit of 2040 sectors
> (just under 1M) to cater to old qemu-nbd. But the server limit
> was raised to 32M in commit 2d8214885 to match the kernel, more
> than three years ago; and the upstream NBD Protocol is proposing
> documentation that without any explicit communication to state
> otherwise, a client should be able to safely assume that a 32M
> transaction will work.  It is time to rely on the larger sizing,
> and any downstream distro that cares about maximum
> interoperability to older qemu-nbd servers can just tweak the
> value of #define NBD_MAX_SECTORS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> v2: new patch
> ---
>  include/block/nbd.h | 1 +
>  block/nbd-client.c  | 4 ----
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/block/nbd.h b/include/block/nbd.h
> index b86a976..36dde24 100644
> --- a/include/block/nbd.h
> +++ b/include/block/nbd.h
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ enum {
> 
>  /* Maximum size of a single READ/WRITE data buffer */
>  #define NBD_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE (32 * 1024 * 1024)
> +#define NBD_MAX_SECTORS (NBD_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE)
> 
>  ssize_t nbd_wr_syncv(QIOChannel *ioc,
>                       struct iovec *iov,
> diff --git a/block/nbd-client.c b/block/nbd-client.c
> index 4d13444..420bce8 100644
> --- a/block/nbd-client.c
> +++ b/block/nbd-client.c
> @@ -269,10 +269,6 @@ static int nbd_co_writev_1(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
>      return -reply.error;
>  }
> 
> -/* qemu-nbd has a limit of slightly less than 1M per request.  Try to
> - * remain aligned to 4K. */
> -#define NBD_MAX_SECTORS 2040
> -
>  int nbd_client_co_readv(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
>                          int nb_sectors, QEMUIOVector *qiov)
>  {
> 

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Fam Zheng June 16, 2016, 5:12 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 06/14 15:30, Eric Blake wrote:
> The NBD layer was breaking up request at a limit of 2040 sectors
> (just under 1M) to cater to old qemu-nbd. But the server limit
> was raised to 32M in commit 2d8214885 to match the kernel, more
> than three years ago; and the upstream NBD Protocol is proposing
> documentation that without any explicit communication to state
> otherwise, a client should be able to safely assume that a 32M
> transaction will work.  It is time to rely on the larger sizing,
> and any downstream distro that cares about maximum
> interoperability to older qemu-nbd servers can just tweak the
> value of #define NBD_MAX_SECTORS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Stefan Hajnoczi June 20, 2016, 12:13 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:30:26PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> The NBD layer was breaking up request at a limit of 2040 sectors
> (just under 1M) to cater to old qemu-nbd. But the server limit
> was raised to 32M in commit 2d8214885 to match the kernel, more
> than three years ago; and the upstream NBD Protocol is proposing
> documentation that without any explicit communication to state
> otherwise, a client should be able to safely assume that a 32M
> transaction will work.  It is time to rely on the larger sizing,
> and any downstream distro that cares about maximum
> interoperability to older qemu-nbd servers can just tweak the
> value of #define NBD_MAX_SECTORS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> v2: new patch
> ---
>  include/block/nbd.h | 1 +
>  block/nbd-client.c  | 4 ----
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/include/block/nbd.h b/include/block/nbd.h
index b86a976..36dde24 100644
--- a/include/block/nbd.h
+++ b/include/block/nbd.h
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@  enum {

 /* Maximum size of a single READ/WRITE data buffer */
 #define NBD_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE (32 * 1024 * 1024)
+#define NBD_MAX_SECTORS (NBD_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE)

 ssize_t nbd_wr_syncv(QIOChannel *ioc,
                      struct iovec *iov,
diff --git a/block/nbd-client.c b/block/nbd-client.c
index 4d13444..420bce8 100644
--- a/block/nbd-client.c
+++ b/block/nbd-client.c
@@ -269,10 +269,6 @@  static int nbd_co_writev_1(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
     return -reply.error;
 }

-/* qemu-nbd has a limit of slightly less than 1M per request.  Try to
- * remain aligned to 4K. */
-#define NBD_MAX_SECTORS 2040
-
 int nbd_client_co_readv(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
                         int nb_sectors, QEMUIOVector *qiov)
 {