From patchwork Thu Jul 28 06:22:21 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Prerna Saxena X-Patchwork-Id: 9250701 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DBD6075F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 06:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23E52094D for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 06:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id B717C2623C; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 06:23:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C0032094D for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 06:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51104 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSeix-0005pd-4R for patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 02:23:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48153) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSeiQ-0005o9-HK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 02:22:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSeiP-0002YO-7q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 02:22:42 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-x241.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::241]:36352) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSeiO-0002YF-SB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 02:22:41 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-x241.google.com with SMTP id y134so3108388pfg.3 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 23:22:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=bsvzd9Dd3JhqB0RJzmVbmSSjybQsplOHWzY3aljVupY=; b=ZcPF/hZcsqpfkFF74Ohog/jYxxIVuruhCa6r/CsjzhQinMnLhIXYx2x6dN/HPeLvM2 MI/NirPe+UAYnWYwYx+fy61ZBVIS2v83dXSgPtsoLgCbykQyb8hAOKE+8r20Wiap8Py1 vDNf/3+zTRKoGKQRvwEMYXFZcS3ncUXArr13HSkKx8dWh2Ydtdcou+ZP/PZPQTRrhsw5 WdJZcZL/JV8XWbcsrxMvx4LjhWJMGqwiC5R83ZHVSiGfFYKmrm3l/QmFnDzwQmA15Xsg 2rOQ5T78G8ayoGj2x/HZ/v9F/pDFAvzSP7MJGEsUsbl16aSi91aWrcQbqBt2Sl3f0Dhh XijA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=bsvzd9Dd3JhqB0RJzmVbmSSjybQsplOHWzY3aljVupY=; b=g2W7p9g3aYBBBaxfqu9E7FHTfJuJuemGGnBNkF8SIXMNc9fc5Y8HwJ9knmdOTZ576u DwRZfXAUaFyuzfARNoUH58qFJeUK8loTNuJGlLgRZvybASHR80011IZw3fI5yEC5KKfa h7g4y9Tu/OVZSUYBTDNBrxol4Oa2o0ExRBiXq7ipuB5+CSm/vb2cEAy/qZrw7KOb0Jzo QgMvUDyqAb0+IWxLw+7XVUWfbFrb4O22739LJDBwxTNLTG0u8/SXp9YYKOwnq5Gw2isf E2gmcBkX8iacRvgP9c/AkStp6aZo1JgeFqqufiF7Dnw/1m25rDqksenVn8XoVbgunR5I OwEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoout1hNJbHoG9rt8OeDv5Ymiu5c7tBjOTeBl5mLQ0iSDiTzuOYfVj2YumH0NB2XksNw== X-Received: by 10.98.105.135 with SMTP id e129mr56257073pfc.59.1469686959971; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 23:22:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from prerna-saxena.dev.eng.nutanix.com. (206-15-90-246.static.twtelecom.net. [206.15.90.246]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b14sm13564008pfd.82.2016.07.27.23.22.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 23:22:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Prerna Saxena To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 23:22:21 -0700 Message-Id: <1469686942-14176-2-git-send-email-saxenap.ltc@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.2 In-Reply-To: <1469686942-14176-1-git-send-email-saxenap.ltc@gmail.com> References: <1469686942-14176-1-git-send-email-saxenap.ltc@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::241 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 v5 1/2] vhost-user: Introduce a new protocol feature REPLY_ACK. X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Prerna Saxena , anilkumar.boggarapu@nutanix.com, felipe@nutanix.com, marcandre.lureau@gmail.com, mst@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Prerna Saxena This introduces the VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK. If negotiated, client applications should send a u64 payload in response to any message that contains the "need_reply" bit set on the message flags. Setting the payload to "zero" indicates the command finished successfully. Likewise, setting it to "non-zero" indicates an error. Currently implemented only for SET_MEM_TABLE. Signed-off-by: Prerna Saxena --- docs/specs/vhost-user.txt | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt b/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt index 777c49c..54b5c8f 100644 --- a/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt +++ b/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ consists of 3 header fields and a payload: * Flags: 32-bit bit field: - Lower 2 bits are the version (currently 0x01) - Bit 2 is the reply flag - needs to be sent on each reply from the slave + - Bit 3 is the need_reply flag - see VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK for + details. * Size - 32-bit size of the payload @@ -126,6 +128,8 @@ the ones that do: * VHOST_GET_VRING_BASE * VHOST_SET_LOG_BASE (if VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_LOG_SHMFD) +[ Also see the section on REPLY_ACK protocol extension. ] + There are several messages that the master sends with file descriptors passed in the ancillary data: @@ -254,6 +258,7 @@ Protocol features #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_MQ 0 #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_LOG_SHMFD 1 #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_RARP 2 +#define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK 3 Message types ------------- @@ -464,3 +469,24 @@ Message types is present in VHOST_USER_GET_PROTOCOL_FEATURES. The first 6 bytes of the payload contain the mac address of the guest to allow the vhost user backend to construct and broadcast the fake RARP. + +VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK: +------------------------------- +The original vhost-user specification only demands replies for certain +commands. This differs from the vhost protocol implementation where commands +are sent over an ioctl() call and block until the client has completed. + +With this protocol extension negotiated, the sender (QEMU) can set the +"need_reply" [Bit 3] flag to any command. This indicates that +the client MUST respond with a Payload VhostUserMsg indicating success or +failure. The payload should be set to zero on success or non-zero on failure. +(Unless the message already has an explicit reply body) + +This indicates to QEMU that the requested operation has deterministically +been met or not. Today, QEMU is expected to terminate the main vhost-user +loop upon receiving such errors. In future, qemu could be taught to be more +resilient for selective requests. + +For the message types that already solicit a reply from the client, the +presence of VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK or need_reply bit being set brings +no behaviourial change. (See the 'Communication' section for details.) diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c index 495e09f..86e7ae0 100644 --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ enum VhostUserProtocolFeature { VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_MQ = 0, VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_LOG_SHMFD = 1, VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_RARP = 2, + VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK = 3, VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_MAX }; @@ -84,6 +85,7 @@ typedef struct VhostUserMsg { #define VHOST_USER_VERSION_MASK (0x3) #define VHOST_USER_REPLY_MASK (0x1<<2) +#define VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK (0x1 << 3) uint32_t flags; uint32_t size; /* the following payload size */ union { @@ -158,6 +160,25 @@ fail: return -1; } +static int process_message_reply(struct vhost_dev *dev, + VhostUserRequest request) +{ + VhostUserMsg msg; + + if (vhost_user_read(dev, &msg) < 0) { + return 0; + } + + if (msg.request != request) { + error_report("Received unexpected msg type." + "Expected %d received %d", + request, msg.request); + return -1; + } + + return msg.payload.u64 ? -1 : 0; +} + static bool vhost_user_one_time_request(VhostUserRequest request) { switch (request) { @@ -239,11 +260,18 @@ static int vhost_user_set_mem_table(struct vhost_dev *dev, int fds[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS]; int i, fd; size_t fd_num = 0; + bool reply_supported = virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features, + VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK); + VhostUserMsg msg = { .request = VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE, .flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION, }; + if (reply_supported) { + msg.flags |= VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK; + } + for (i = 0; i < dev->mem->nregions; ++i) { struct vhost_memory_region *reg = dev->mem->regions + i; ram_addr_t offset; @@ -277,6 +305,10 @@ static int vhost_user_set_mem_table(struct vhost_dev *dev, vhost_user_write(dev, &msg, fds, fd_num); + if (reply_supported) { + return process_message_reply(dev, msg.request); + } + return 0; }