| Message ID | 1476189467-11804-2-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:37:46AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > The object_property_add_bool() call in dummy_init() was always > failing because there was a "bv" class property already. Remove > the class property so both object properties and class properties > are covered by the test code. > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> > --- > tests/check-qom-proplist.c | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Regards, Daniel
diff --git a/tests/check-qom-proplist.c b/tests/check-qom-proplist.c index a16cefc..693dc4c 100644 --- a/tests/check-qom-proplist.c +++ b/tests/check-qom-proplist.c @@ -129,10 +129,6 @@ static void dummy_init(Object *obj) static void dummy_class_init(ObjectClass *cls, void *data) { - object_class_property_add_bool(cls, "bv", - dummy_get_bv, - dummy_set_bv, - NULL); object_class_property_add_str(cls, "sv", dummy_get_sv, dummy_set_sv,
The object_property_add_bool() call in dummy_init() was always failing because there was a "bv" class property already. Remove the class property so both object properties and class properties are covered by the test code. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> --- tests/check-qom-proplist.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)