| Message ID | 1479990609-28243-3-git-send-email-liq3ea@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:30 PM Li Qiang <liq3ea@gmail.com> wrote: > If the guest destroy the resource before detach banking, the 'iov' > and 'addrs' field in resource is not freed thus leading memory > leak issue. This patch avoid this. > > That looks correct to me. Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Please squash patch 1 (no reason for it to be split). > Signed-off-by: Li Qiang <liq3ea@gmail.com> > --- > hw/display/virtio-gpu.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/hw/display/virtio-gpu.c b/hw/display/virtio-gpu.c > index cc725a6..98dadf2 100644 > --- a/hw/display/virtio-gpu.c > +++ b/hw/display/virtio-gpu.c > @@ -360,6 +360,7 @@ static void virtio_gpu_resource_destroy(VirtIOGPU *g, > struct virtio_gpu_simple_resource > *res) > { > pixman_image_unref(res->image); > + virtio_gpu_cleanup_mapping(res); > QTAILQ_REMOVE(&g->reslist, res, next); > g_free(res); > } > -- > 1.8.3.1 > > -- Marc-André Lureau
diff --git a/hw/display/virtio-gpu.c b/hw/display/virtio-gpu.c index cc725a6..98dadf2 100644 --- a/hw/display/virtio-gpu.c +++ b/hw/display/virtio-gpu.c @@ -360,6 +360,7 @@ static void virtio_gpu_resource_destroy(VirtIOGPU *g, struct virtio_gpu_simple_resource *res) { pixman_image_unref(res->image); + virtio_gpu_cleanup_mapping(res); QTAILQ_REMOVE(&g->reslist, res, next); g_free(res); }
If the guest destroy the resource before detach banking, the 'iov' and 'addrs' field in resource is not freed thus leading memory leak issue. This patch avoid this. Signed-off-by: Li Qiang <liq3ea@gmail.com> --- hw/display/virtio-gpu.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)