From patchwork Thu Mar 2 09:54:17 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zhang Chen X-Patchwork-Id: 9599759 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A51660414 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F2A28552 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id E2DCA28585; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:57:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AC4728552 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51309 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjNUC-0000Xc-8Q for patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 04:57:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43762) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjNSd-0007u1-Rm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 04:55:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjNSc-0003Yt-JM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 04:55:47 -0500 Received: from [59.151.112.132] (port=32331 helo=heian.cn.fujitsu.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjNSc-0003XR-5T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 04:55:46 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,518,1449504000"; d="scan'208";a="16135631" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 02 Mar 2017 17:55:35 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.80]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7650A47D8B83; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:55:32 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.167.226.56) by G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:55:32 +0800 From: Zhang Chen To: qemu devel , Jason Wang Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:54:17 +0800 Message-ID: <1488448458-4976-3-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1488448458-4976-1-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1488448458-4976-1-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.167.226.56] X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 7650A47D8B83.AD819 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 59.151.112.132 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 2/3] COLO-compare: Optimize compare_common and compare_tcp X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Li Zhijian , bian naimeng , "eddie . dong" , zhanghailiang , Zhang Chen Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Add offset args for colo_packet_compare_common, optimize colo_packet_compare_icmp() and colo_packet_compare_udp() just compare the IP payload. Before compare all tcp packet, we compare tcp checksum firstly, this function can get better performance. Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen --- net/colo-compare.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c index 602a758..9f5968d 100644 --- a/net/colo-compare.c +++ b/net/colo-compare.c @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode) * return: 0 means packet same * > 0 || < 0 means packet different */ -static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt) +static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt, int offset) { trace_colo_compare_ip_info(ppkt->size, inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src), inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size, @@ -188,7 +188,8 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt) inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst)); if (ppkt->size == spkt->size) { - return memcmp(ppkt->data, spkt->data, spkt->size); + return memcmp(ppkt->data + offset, spkt->data + offset, + spkt->size - offset); } else { trace_colo_compare_main("Net packet size are not the same"); return -1; @@ -207,13 +208,6 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) trace_colo_compare_main("compare tcp"); - if (ppkt->size != spkt->size) { - if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) { - trace_colo_compare_main("pkt size not same"); - } - return -1; - } - ptcp = (struct tcphdr *)ppkt->transport_header; stcp = (struct tcphdr *)spkt->transport_header; @@ -231,8 +225,11 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) spkt->ip->ip_sum = ppkt->ip->ip_sum; } - res = memcmp(ppkt->data + ETH_HLEN, spkt->data + ETH_HLEN, - (spkt->size - ETH_HLEN)); + if (ptcp->th_sum == stcp->th_sum) { + res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ETH_HLEN); + } else { + res = -1; + } if (res != 0 && trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) { trace_colo_compare_pkt_info_src(inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src), @@ -263,10 +260,22 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) { int ret; + int network_header_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4; trace_colo_compare_main("compare udp"); - ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt); + /* + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection, + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later. + * COLO just concern the response net packet payload from primary guest + * and secondary guest are same or not, So we ignored all IP header include + * other field like TOS,TTL,IP Checksum. we only need to compare + * the ip payload here. + */ + ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, + network_header_length + ETH_HLEN); if (ret) { trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size); @@ -284,9 +293,22 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) */ static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) { + int network_header_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4; + trace_colo_compare_main("compare icmp"); - if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt)) { + /* + * Because of ppkt and spkt are both in the same connection, + * The ppkt's src ip, dst ip, src port, dst port, ip_proto all are + * same with spkt. In addition, IP header's Identification is a random + * field, we can handle it in IP fragmentation function later. + * COLO just concern the response net packet payload from primary guest + * and secondary guest are same or not, So we ignored all IP header include + * other field like TOS,TTL,IP Checksum. we only need to compare + * the ip payload here. + */ + if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, + network_header_length + ETH_HLEN)) { trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size); qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare", @@ -312,7 +334,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_other(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt) inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size, inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_src), inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst)); - return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt); + return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, 0); } static int colo_old_packet_check_one(Packet *pkt, int64_t *check_time)