diff mbox series

[v3,3/9] x86_iommu/amd: remove V=1 check from amdvi_validate_dte()

Message ID 1537539920-30662-4-git-send-email-brijesh.singh@amd.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series x86_iommu/amd: add interrupt remap support | expand

Commit Message

Brijesh Singh Sept. 21, 2018, 2:25 p.m. UTC
Currently, the amdvi_validate_dte() assumes that a valid DTE will
always have V=1. This is not true. The V=1 means that bit[127:1] are
valid. A valid DTE can have IV=1 and V=0 (i.e address translation
disabled and interrupt remapping enabled)

Remove the V=1 check from amdvi_validate_dte(), make the caller
responsible to check for V or IV bits.

Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
---
 hw/i386/amd_iommu.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Peter Xu Sept. 25, 2018, 6:17 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 02:25:37PM +0000, Singh, Brijesh wrote:
> Currently, the amdvi_validate_dte() assumes that a valid DTE will
> always have V=1. This is not true. The V=1 means that bit[127:1] are
> valid. A valid DTE can have IV=1 and V=0 (i.e address translation
> disabled and interrupt remapping enabled)
> 
> Remove the V=1 check from amdvi_validate_dte(), make the caller
> responsible to check for V or IV bits.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
> Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> ---
>  hw/i386/amd_iommu.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
> index 1fd669f..f9aae02 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
> @@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ static inline uint64_t amdvi_get_perms(uint64_t entry)
>             AMDVI_DEV_PERM_SHIFT;
>  }
>  
> -/* a valid entry should have V = 1 and reserved bits honoured */
> +/* validate that reserved bits are honoured */
>  static bool amdvi_validate_dte(AMDVIState *s, uint16_t devid,
>                                 uint64_t *dte)
>  {
> @@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ static bool amdvi_validate_dte(AMDVIState *s, uint16_t devid,
>          return false;
>      }
>  
> -    return dte[0] & AMDVI_DEV_VALID;
> +    return true;
>  }
>  
>  /* get a device table entry given the devid */
> @@ -967,7 +967,8 @@ static void amdvi_do_translate(AMDVIAddressSpace *as, hwaddr addr,
>      }
>  
>      /* devices with V = 0 are not translated */
> -    if (!amdvi_get_dte(s, devid, entry)) {
> +    if (!amdvi_get_dte(s, devid, entry) ||
> +        !(entry[0] & AMDVI_DEV_VALID)) {
>          goto out;

The patch itself looks sane to me, but I noticed that when we do "goto
out" we're actually assuming a default passthrough translation.  IMHO
we should capture the error cases (e.g., non-zero reserved bits) and
for those instead of doing translations and DMA we should reject the
translation request and report.  Otherwise we might have potential
risk on guest memory corruption.

>      }
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

Regards,
Brijesh Singh Sept. 27, 2018, 12:04 p.m. UTC | #2
On 9/25/18 1:17 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 02:25:37PM +0000, Singh, Brijesh wrote:
>> Currently, the amdvi_validate_dte() assumes that a valid DTE will
>> always have V=1. This is not true. The V=1 means that bit[127:1] are
>> valid. A valid DTE can have IV=1 and V=0 (i.e address translation
>> disabled and interrupt remapping enabled)
>>
>> Remove the V=1 check from amdvi_validate_dte(), make the caller
>> responsible to check for V or IV bits.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
>> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
>> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Tom Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
>> Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/i386/amd_iommu.c | 7 ++++---
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>> index 1fd669f..f9aae02 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>> @@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ static inline uint64_t amdvi_get_perms(uint64_t entry)
>>             AMDVI_DEV_PERM_SHIFT;
>>  }
>>  
>> -/* a valid entry should have V = 1 and reserved bits honoured */
>> +/* validate that reserved bits are honoured */
>>  static bool amdvi_validate_dte(AMDVIState *s, uint16_t devid,
>>                                 uint64_t *dte)
>>  {
>> @@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ static bool amdvi_validate_dte(AMDVIState *s, uint16_t devid,
>>          return false;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    return dte[0] & AMDVI_DEV_VALID;
>> +    return true;
>>  }
>>  
>>  /* get a device table entry given the devid */
>> @@ -967,7 +967,8 @@ static void amdvi_do_translate(AMDVIAddressSpace *as, hwaddr addr,
>>      }
>>  
>>      /* devices with V = 0 are not translated */
>> -    if (!amdvi_get_dte(s, devid, entry)) {
>> +    if (!amdvi_get_dte(s, devid, entry) ||
>> +        !(entry[0] & AMDVI_DEV_VALID)) {
>>          goto out;
> The patch itself looks sane to me, but I noticed that when we do "goto
> out" we're actually assuming a default passthrough translation.  IMHO
> we should capture the error cases (e.g., non-zero reserved bits) and
> for those instead of doing translations and DMA we should reject the
> translation request and report.  Otherwise we might have potential
> risk on guest memory corruption.
>

OK, I can break check as below and log the error

if (!amdvi_get_dte(s, devid, entry)) {
   /* log error */
}

if (!(entry[0] & AMDVI_DEV_VALID)) {
     goto out; /* pass through */
}

>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.7.4
>>
> Regards,
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
index 1fd669f..f9aae02 100644
--- a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@  static inline uint64_t amdvi_get_perms(uint64_t entry)
            AMDVI_DEV_PERM_SHIFT;
 }
 
-/* a valid entry should have V = 1 and reserved bits honoured */
+/* validate that reserved bits are honoured */
 static bool amdvi_validate_dte(AMDVIState *s, uint16_t devid,
                                uint64_t *dte)
 {
@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@  static bool amdvi_validate_dte(AMDVIState *s, uint16_t devid,
         return false;
     }
 
-    return dte[0] & AMDVI_DEV_VALID;
+    return true;
 }
 
 /* get a device table entry given the devid */
@@ -967,7 +967,8 @@  static void amdvi_do_translate(AMDVIAddressSpace *as, hwaddr addr,
     }
 
     /* devices with V = 0 are not translated */
-    if (!amdvi_get_dte(s, devid, entry)) {
+    if (!amdvi_get_dte(s, devid, entry) ||
+        !(entry[0] & AMDVI_DEV_VALID)) {
         goto out;
     }