From patchwork Fri Oct 6 15:53:29 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kevin Wolf X-Patchwork-Id: 9989909 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25836029B for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 15:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF4428E0A for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 15:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id D3DF928E0C; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 15:58:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92B9328E0A for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 15:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45607 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0V1U-0002qA-N1 for patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 11:58:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55262) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0UxQ-0008Tp-9V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 11:54:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0UxP-0002NK-HU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 11:54:36 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39360) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0UxJ-0002C6-As; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 11:54:29 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 387C3CD254; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 15:54:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 387C3CD254 Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kwolf@redhat.com Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (unknown [10.36.118.31]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480A067585; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 15:54:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Kevin Wolf To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 17:53:29 +0200 Message-Id: <20171006155422.10135-2-kwolf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20171006155422.10135-1-kwolf@redhat.com> References: <20171006155422.10135-1-kwolf@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Fri, 06 Oct 2017 15:54:28 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 01/54] block: Typo fix in copy_on_readv() X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Eric Blake Signed-off-by: Eric Blake Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf --- block/io.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c index 4378ae4c7d..d633b0f851 100644 --- a/block/io.c +++ b/block/io.c @@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv(BdrvChild *child, /* FIXME We cannot require callers to have write permissions when all they * are doing is a read request. If we did things right, write permissions * would be obtained anyway, but internally by the copy-on-read code. As - * long as it is implemented here rather than in a separat filter driver, + * long as it is implemented here rather than in a separate filter driver, * the copy-on-read code doesn't have its own BdrvChild, however, for which * it could request permissions. Therefore we have to bypass the permission * system for the moment. */