Message ID | 20180323124637.11220-1-dgilbert@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 12:46:37PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote: > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> > > My rework of section adding combines overlapping or abutting regions, > but checks they're actually the same underlying RAM block. > Fix the case where two blocks abut but don't overlap; that new region > should get added (but not combined), but my previous patch was disallowing it. > > Fixes: c1ece84e7c9 > > Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Can we replace abutting with adjacent pls? > --- > hw/virtio/vhost.c | 13 +++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c > index 250f886acb..fc9062a89f 100644 > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c > @@ -595,10 +595,15 @@ static void vhost_region_add_section(struct vhost_dev *dev, > prev_sec->offset_within_address_space, > prev_sec->offset_within_region); > } else { > - error_report("%s: Overlapping but not coherent sections " > - "at %"PRIx64, > - __func__, mrs_gpa); > - return; > + /* abutting regions are fine, but overlapping ones with > + * different blocks/offsets shouldn't happen > + */ > + if (mrs_gpa != prev_gpa_end + 1) { > + error_report("%s: Overlapping but not coherent sections " > + "at %"PRIx64, > + __func__, mrs_gpa); > + return; > + } > } > } > } > -- > 2.14.3
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 12:46:37PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote: > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> > > My rework of section adding combines overlapping or abutting regions, > but checks they're actually the same underlying RAM block. > Fix the case where two blocks abut but don't overlap; that new region > should get added (but not combined), but my previous patch was disallowing it. > > Fixes: c1ece84e7c9 > > Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> I prefer adjacent and not abutting. > --- > hw/virtio/vhost.c | 13 +++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c > index 250f886acb..fc9062a89f 100644 > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c > @@ -595,10 +595,15 @@ static void vhost_region_add_section(struct vhost_dev *dev, > prev_sec->offset_within_address_space, > prev_sec->offset_within_region); > } else { > - error_report("%s: Overlapping but not coherent sections " > - "at %"PRIx64, > - __func__, mrs_gpa); > - return; > + /* abutting regions are fine, but overlapping ones with > + * different blocks/offsets shouldn't happen > + */ > + if (mrs_gpa != prev_gpa_end + 1) { > + error_report("%s: Overlapping but not coherent sections " > + "at %"PRIx64, > + __func__, mrs_gpa); > + return; > + } > } > } > } > -- > 2.14.3
* Michael S. Tsirkin (mst@redhat.com) wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 12:46:37PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote: > > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> > > > > My rework of section adding combines overlapping or abutting regions, > > but checks they're actually the same underlying RAM block. > > Fix the case where two blocks abut but don't overlap; that new region > > should get added (but not combined), but my previous patch was disallowing it. > > > > Fixes: c1ece84e7c9 > > > > Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> > > Can we replace abutting with adjacent pls? Sure; do you want to fix that in commit? Dave > > --- > > hw/virtio/vhost.c | 13 +++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c > > index 250f886acb..fc9062a89f 100644 > > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c > > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c > > @@ -595,10 +595,15 @@ static void vhost_region_add_section(struct vhost_dev *dev, > > prev_sec->offset_within_address_space, > > prev_sec->offset_within_region); > > } else { > > - error_report("%s: Overlapping but not coherent sections " > > - "at %"PRIx64, > > - __func__, mrs_gpa); > > - return; > > + /* abutting regions are fine, but overlapping ones with > > + * different blocks/offsets shouldn't happen > > + */ > > + if (mrs_gpa != prev_gpa_end + 1) { > > + error_report("%s: Overlapping but not coherent sections " > > + "at %"PRIx64, > > + __func__, mrs_gpa); > > + return; > > + } > > } > > } > > } > > -- > > 2.14.3 -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 02:53:38PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > * Michael S. Tsirkin (mst@redhat.com) wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 12:46:37PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote: > > > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> > > > > > > My rework of section adding combines overlapping or abutting regions, > > > but checks they're actually the same underlying RAM block. > > > Fix the case where two blocks abut but don't overlap; that new region > > > should get added (but not combined), but my previous patch was disallowing it. > > > > > > Fixes: c1ece84e7c9 > > > > > > Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> > > > > Can we replace abutting with adjacent pls? > > Sure; do you want to fix that in commit? > > Dave Rather. > > > --- > > > hw/virtio/vhost.c | 13 +++++++++---- > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c > > > index 250f886acb..fc9062a89f 100644 > > > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c > > > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c > > > @@ -595,10 +595,15 @@ static void vhost_region_add_section(struct vhost_dev *dev, > > > prev_sec->offset_within_address_space, > > > prev_sec->offset_within_region); > > > } else { > > > - error_report("%s: Overlapping but not coherent sections " > > > - "at %"PRIx64, > > > - __func__, mrs_gpa); > > > - return; > > > + /* abutting regions are fine, but overlapping ones with > > > + * different blocks/offsets shouldn't happen > > > + */ > > > + if (mrs_gpa != prev_gpa_end + 1) { > > > + error_report("%s: Overlapping but not coherent sections " > > > + "at %"PRIx64, > > > + __func__, mrs_gpa); > > > + return; > > > + } > > > } > > > } > > > } > > > -- > > > 2.14.3 > -- > Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c index 250f886acb..fc9062a89f 100644 --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c @@ -595,10 +595,15 @@ static void vhost_region_add_section(struct vhost_dev *dev, prev_sec->offset_within_address_space, prev_sec->offset_within_region); } else { - error_report("%s: Overlapping but not coherent sections " - "at %"PRIx64, - __func__, mrs_gpa); - return; + /* abutting regions are fine, but overlapping ones with + * different blocks/offsets shouldn't happen + */ + if (mrs_gpa != prev_gpa_end + 1) { + error_report("%s: Overlapping but not coherent sections " + "at %"PRIx64, + __func__, mrs_gpa); + return; + } } } }