Message ID | 20181213050453.9677-72-cota@braap.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org> Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF536C5 for <patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 06:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE812B941 for <patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 06:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 42C4B2B958; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 06:00:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBF982B996 for <patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 06:00:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50736 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org>) id 1gXK2d-00067V-5M for patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 01:00:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <cota@braap.org>) id 1gXJD1-00084N-VR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:06:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <cota@braap.org>) id 1gXJCz-0002D7-Dk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:06:51 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:33569) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <cota@braap.org>) id 1gXJCz-0001te-5M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:06:49 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241812227E; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:05:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:05:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=braap.org; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; s= mesmtp; bh=aZ4CsdwOv+J86HgC+J/Gx/Z1kx3JZJjjRTEf1sDV3gw=; b=OhniB noL3ulgsCIcAgFvOer5SQdySNzUYbB7rs6+RS+rzSOBhk9BgUFEZdVdn+u53g2VW benQ9GTz2ASp0WdKu2jl5TTYoNo+EMx7PNWQUiqeptLKcrJq/T+xfw9Z9tCuEMF9 LMcm/HSdGcddzSUH7Z85ifOnjIu8++RmTtmbBc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id :references:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=aZ4CsdwOv+J86HgC+J/Gx/Z1kx3JZ JjjRTEf1sDV3gw=; b=SkX45HKXPFpC+APY9oToZK7hAjWnFCAplYpFNagt415cY +dImwrGos8QYuyrZGNb7bulxxAUD6r2I7d1UYI5WqLstWhV4SPh5EJg2yX4jNN6l mn2962QITQc0bVWaSnJjxnA7YZxm7WtkKezYC9/SON00D8v+/iUKCrGegUsH9pco d6uWxFtd9GMHowYNFP6IGO9J9pShizymCB/Exhy5I8Z0tQmCnfWURajEUygPMvip KHcvY7CSbMdt3oueEe/ag8oA4VutwfcVjAX0ineJHDBY+Nxs55XT6CDxuZzAvH5a 4DxRjWqtAbkE0i+bqTzAdp0srJACgnubRy5/XLKAQ== X-ME-Sender: <xms:sOgRXGfTfmqo2YRjomXZx1LvD4RzsX7MZY-c6pBWhN1O3O97SCcMXA> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtkedrudehuddgkedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfquhhtnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucef tddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufffkof gjfhestddtredtredttdenucfhrhhomhepfdfgmhhilhhiohcuifdrucevohhtrgdfuceo tghothgrsegsrhgrrghprdhorhhgqeenucfkphepuddvkedrheelrddvtddrvdduieenuc frrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheptghothgrsegsrhgrrghprdhorhhgnecuvehluhhs thgvrhfuihiivgepudel X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:segRXNtv0PiJXYX48137UxFEmxnZDrHvpT2qQ1eNKW_YeqNkQG_eBg> <xmx:segRXKJV6NpxwA2u3kZ3shnlDqwcYjyWdw8Yc69acbI9VGokqKDt6w> <xmx:segRXJZPqyZzKiBG8EzilsMFAw0xnD4nsEg02dQnJWg8VaA6-hd20g> <xmx:segRXMbfTey6OAbDWbhXsTpuELMfW4no6i4-lYITNgOdHH0uSVOWGw> Received: from localhost (flamenco.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.20.216]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B65E710086; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:05:52 -0500 (EST) From: "Emilio G. Cota" <cota@braap.org> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:04:51 -0500 Message-Id: <20181213050453.9677-72-cota@braap.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20181213050453.9677-1-cota@braap.org> References: <20181213050453.9677-1-cota@braap.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.25 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 71/73] cpus-common: release BQL earlier in run_on_cpu X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: =?utf-8?q?Alex_Benn=C3=A9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" <qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP |
Series |
per-CPU locks
|
expand
|
diff --git a/cpus-common.c b/cpus-common.c index 36ce9872bd..08031e37f4 100644 --- a/cpus-common.c +++ b/cpus-common.c @@ -145,6 +145,11 @@ void run_on_cpu(CPUState *cpu, run_on_cpu_func func, run_on_cpu_data data) return; } + /* We are going to sleep on the CPU lock, so release the BQL */ + if (has_bql) { + qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(); + } + wi.func = func; wi.data = data; wi.done = false; @@ -153,21 +158,6 @@ void run_on_cpu(CPUState *cpu, run_on_cpu_func func, run_on_cpu_data data) cpu_mutex_lock(cpu); queue_work_on_cpu_locked(cpu, &wi); - - /* - * We are going to sleep on the CPU lock, so release the BQL. - * - * During the transition to per-CPU locks, we release the BQL _after_ - * having kicked the destination CPU (from queue_work_on_cpu_locked above). - * This makes sure that the enqueued work will be seen by the CPU - * after being woken up from the kick, since the CPU sleeps on the BQL. - * Once we complete the transition to per-CPU locks, we will release - * the BQL earlier in this function. - */ - if (has_bql) { - qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(); - } - while (!atomic_mb_read(&wi.done)) { CPUState *self_cpu = current_cpu;