From patchwork Fri Jan 18 14:07:57 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Fabiano Rosas X-Patchwork-Id: 10770347 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC82114E5 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8B02E670 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id CE9BD2E67C; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:13:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2734F2E670 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40166 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gkUtt-0003Rs-CQ for patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:13:37 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57596) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gkUoz-0007JU-IJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:08:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gkUoy-0002uG-JH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:08:33 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:57196 helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gkUox-0002oC-Sb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:08:32 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x0IDxoT2080913 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:08:27 -0500 Received: from e16.ny.us.ibm.com (e16.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.206]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2q3efncga2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:08:27 -0500 Received: from localhost by e16.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:08:26 -0000 Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.29) by e16.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.203) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:08:22 -0000 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x0IE8LGH24183034 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:08:21 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EC7112064; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:08:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11F2112076; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:08:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from farosas.linux.ibm.com.br.ibm.com (unknown [9.86.26.66]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:08:19 +0000 (GMT) From: Fabiano Rosas To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 12:07:57 -0200 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190118140758.829-1-farosas@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190118140758.829-1-farosas@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19011814-0072-0000-0000-000003EC0696 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010430; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000275; SDB=6.01148269; UDB=6.00598209; IPR=6.00928572; MB=3.00025187; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-01-18 14:08:25 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19011814-0073-0000-0000-00004ADB3510 Message-Id: <20190118140758.829-7-farosas@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-01-18_08:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=946 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901180101 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 148.163.158.5 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 6/7] target/ppc: Refactor kvm_handle_debug X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, cohuck@redhat.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, philmd@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP There are four scenarios being handled in this function: - single stepping - hardware breakpoints - software breakpoints - fallback (no debug supported) A future patch will add code to handle specific single step and software breakpoints cases so let's split each scenario into its own function now to avoid hurting readability. Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy --- target/ppc/kvm.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm.c b/target/ppc/kvm.c index 96a5895792..c27190d7fb 100644 --- a/target/ppc/kvm.c +++ b/target/ppc/kvm.c @@ -1621,52 +1621,66 @@ static int kvm_handle_hw_breakpoint(CPUState *cs, return handle; } +static int kvm_handle_singlestep(void) +{ + return 1; +} + +static int kvm_handle_sw_breakpoint(void) +{ + return 1; +} + static int kvm_handle_debug(PowerPCCPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run) { CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu); CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env; struct kvm_debug_exit_arch *arch_info = &run->debug.arch; - int handle = 0; if (cs->singlestep_enabled) { - handle = 1; - } else if (arch_info->status) { - handle = kvm_handle_hw_breakpoint(cs, arch_info); - } else if (kvm_find_sw_breakpoint(cs, arch_info->address)) { - handle = 1; - } else { - /* QEMU is not able to handle debug exception, so inject - * program exception to guest; - * Yes program exception NOT debug exception !! - * When QEMU is using debug resources then debug exception must - * be always set. To achieve this we set MSR_DE and also set - * MSRP_DEP so guest cannot change MSR_DE. - * When emulating debug resource for guest we want guest - * to control MSR_DE (enable/disable debug interrupt on need). - * Supporting both configurations are NOT possible. - * So the result is that we cannot share debug resources - * between QEMU and Guest on BOOKE architecture. - * In the current design QEMU gets the priority over guest, - * this means that if QEMU is using debug resources then guest - * cannot use them; - * For software breakpoint QEMU uses a privileged instruction; - * So there cannot be any reason that we are here for guest - * set debug exception, only possibility is guest executed a - * privileged / illegal instruction and that's why we are - * injecting a program interrupt. - */ + return kvm_handle_singlestep(); + } + + if (arch_info->status) { + return kvm_handle_hw_breakpoint(cs, arch_info); + } - cpu_synchronize_state(cs); - /* env->nip is PC, so increment this by 4 to use - * ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(), which set srr0 = env->nip - 4. - */ - env->nip += 4; - cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM; - env->error_code = POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL; - ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(cs); + if (kvm_find_sw_breakpoint(cs, arch_info->address)) { + return kvm_handle_sw_breakpoint(); } - return handle; + /* + * QEMU is not able to handle debug exception, so inject + * program exception to guest; + * Yes program exception NOT debug exception !! + * When QEMU is using debug resources then debug exception must + * be always set. To achieve this we set MSR_DE and also set + * MSRP_DEP so guest cannot change MSR_DE. + * When emulating debug resource for guest we want guest + * to control MSR_DE (enable/disable debug interrupt on need). + * Supporting both configurations are NOT possible. + * So the result is that we cannot share debug resources + * between QEMU and Guest on BOOKE architecture. + * In the current design QEMU gets the priority over guest, + * this means that if QEMU is using debug resources then guest + * cannot use them; + * For software breakpoint QEMU uses a privileged instruction; + * So there cannot be any reason that we are here for guest + * set debug exception, only possibility is guest executed a + * privileged / illegal instruction and that's why we are + * injecting a program interrupt. + */ + cpu_synchronize_state(cs); + /* + * env->nip is PC, so increment this by 4 to use + * ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(), which set srr0 = env->nip - 4. + */ + env->nip += 4; + cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM; + env->error_code = POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL; + ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(cs); + + return 0; } int kvm_arch_handle_exit(CPUState *cs, struct kvm_run *run)