diff mbox series

[RFC,v4,4/5] target/ppc: Refactor kvm_handle_debug

Message ID 20190228225759.21328-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series target/ppc: single step for KVM HV | expand

Commit Message

Fabiano Rosas Feb. 28, 2019, 10:57 p.m. UTC
There are four scenarios being handled in this function:

- single stepping
- hardware breakpoints
- software breakpoints
- fallback (no debug supported)

A future patch will add code to handle specific single step and
software breakpoints cases so let's split each scenario into its own
function now to avoid hurting readability.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
 target/ppc/kvm.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

Comments

David Gibson March 4, 2019, 5:56 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 07:57:58PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> There are four scenarios being handled in this function:
> 
> - single stepping
> - hardware breakpoints
> - software breakpoints
> - fallback (no debug supported)
> 
> A future patch will add code to handle specific single step and
> software breakpoints cases so let's split each scenario into its own
> function now to avoid hurting readability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>

Again, a nice cleanup regardless of anything else.  Applied.

> ---
>  target/ppc/kvm.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm.c b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> index 941c4e7523..9392fba192 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> @@ -1620,52 +1620,66 @@ static int kvm_handle_hw_breakpoint(CPUState *cs,
>      return handle;
>  }
>  
> +static int kvm_handle_singlestep(void)
> +{
> +    return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_handle_sw_breakpoint(void)
> +{
> +    return 1;
> +}
> +
>  static int kvm_handle_debug(PowerPCCPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  {
>      CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
>      CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
>      struct kvm_debug_exit_arch *arch_info = &run->debug.arch;
> -    int handle = 0;
>  
>      if (cs->singlestep_enabled) {
> -        handle = 1;
> -    } else if (arch_info->status) {
> -        handle = kvm_handle_hw_breakpoint(cs, arch_info);
> -    } else if (kvm_find_sw_breakpoint(cs, arch_info->address)) {
> -        handle = 1;
> -    } else {
> -        /* QEMU is not able to handle debug exception, so inject
> -         * program exception to guest;
> -         * Yes program exception NOT debug exception !!
> -         * When QEMU is using debug resources then debug exception must
> -         * be always set. To achieve this we set MSR_DE and also set
> -         * MSRP_DEP so guest cannot change MSR_DE.
> -         * When emulating debug resource for guest we want guest
> -         * to control MSR_DE (enable/disable debug interrupt on need).
> -         * Supporting both configurations are NOT possible.
> -         * So the result is that we cannot share debug resources
> -         * between QEMU and Guest on BOOKE architecture.
> -         * In the current design QEMU gets the priority over guest,
> -         * this means that if QEMU is using debug resources then guest
> -         * cannot use them;
> -         * For software breakpoint QEMU uses a privileged instruction;
> -         * So there cannot be any reason that we are here for guest
> -         * set debug exception, only possibility is guest executed a
> -         * privileged / illegal instruction and that's why we are
> -         * injecting a program interrupt.
> -         */
> +        return kvm_handle_singlestep();
> +    }
> +
> +    if (arch_info->status) {
> +        return kvm_handle_hw_breakpoint(cs, arch_info);
> +    }
>  
> -        cpu_synchronize_state(cs);
> -        /* env->nip is PC, so increment this by 4 to use
> -         * ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(), which set srr0 = env->nip - 4.
> -         */
> -        env->nip += 4;
> -        cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM;
> -        env->error_code = POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL;
> -        ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(cs);
> +    if (kvm_find_sw_breakpoint(cs, arch_info->address)) {
> +        return kvm_handle_sw_breakpoint();
>      }
>  
> -    return handle;
> +    /*
> +     * QEMU is not able to handle debug exception, so inject
> +     * program exception to guest;
> +     * Yes program exception NOT debug exception !!
> +     * When QEMU is using debug resources then debug exception must
> +     * be always set. To achieve this we set MSR_DE and also set
> +     * MSRP_DEP so guest cannot change MSR_DE.
> +     * When emulating debug resource for guest we want guest
> +     * to control MSR_DE (enable/disable debug interrupt on need).
> +     * Supporting both configurations are NOT possible.
> +     * So the result is that we cannot share debug resources
> +     * between QEMU and Guest on BOOKE architecture.
> +     * In the current design QEMU gets the priority over guest,
> +     * this means that if QEMU is using debug resources then guest
> +     * cannot use them;
> +     * For software breakpoint QEMU uses a privileged instruction;
> +     * So there cannot be any reason that we are here for guest
> +     * set debug exception, only possibility is guest executed a
> +     * privileged / illegal instruction and that's why we are
> +     * injecting a program interrupt.
> +     */
> +    cpu_synchronize_state(cs);
> +    /*
> +     * env->nip is PC, so increment this by 4 to use
> +     * ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(), which set srr0 = env->nip - 4.
> +     */
> +    env->nip += 4;
> +    cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM;
> +    env->error_code = POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL;
> +    ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(cs);
> +
> +    return 0;
>  }
>  
>  int kvm_arch_handle_exit(CPUState *cs, struct kvm_run *run)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm.c b/target/ppc/kvm.c
index 941c4e7523..9392fba192 100644
--- a/target/ppc/kvm.c
+++ b/target/ppc/kvm.c
@@ -1620,52 +1620,66 @@  static int kvm_handle_hw_breakpoint(CPUState *cs,
     return handle;
 }
 
+static int kvm_handle_singlestep(void)
+{
+    return 1;
+}
+
+static int kvm_handle_sw_breakpoint(void)
+{
+    return 1;
+}
+
 static int kvm_handle_debug(PowerPCCPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 {
     CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
     CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
     struct kvm_debug_exit_arch *arch_info = &run->debug.arch;
-    int handle = 0;
 
     if (cs->singlestep_enabled) {
-        handle = 1;
-    } else if (arch_info->status) {
-        handle = kvm_handle_hw_breakpoint(cs, arch_info);
-    } else if (kvm_find_sw_breakpoint(cs, arch_info->address)) {
-        handle = 1;
-    } else {
-        /* QEMU is not able to handle debug exception, so inject
-         * program exception to guest;
-         * Yes program exception NOT debug exception !!
-         * When QEMU is using debug resources then debug exception must
-         * be always set. To achieve this we set MSR_DE and also set
-         * MSRP_DEP so guest cannot change MSR_DE.
-         * When emulating debug resource for guest we want guest
-         * to control MSR_DE (enable/disable debug interrupt on need).
-         * Supporting both configurations are NOT possible.
-         * So the result is that we cannot share debug resources
-         * between QEMU and Guest on BOOKE architecture.
-         * In the current design QEMU gets the priority over guest,
-         * this means that if QEMU is using debug resources then guest
-         * cannot use them;
-         * For software breakpoint QEMU uses a privileged instruction;
-         * So there cannot be any reason that we are here for guest
-         * set debug exception, only possibility is guest executed a
-         * privileged / illegal instruction and that's why we are
-         * injecting a program interrupt.
-         */
+        return kvm_handle_singlestep();
+    }
+
+    if (arch_info->status) {
+        return kvm_handle_hw_breakpoint(cs, arch_info);
+    }
 
-        cpu_synchronize_state(cs);
-        /* env->nip is PC, so increment this by 4 to use
-         * ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(), which set srr0 = env->nip - 4.
-         */
-        env->nip += 4;
-        cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM;
-        env->error_code = POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL;
-        ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(cs);
+    if (kvm_find_sw_breakpoint(cs, arch_info->address)) {
+        return kvm_handle_sw_breakpoint();
     }
 
-    return handle;
+    /*
+     * QEMU is not able to handle debug exception, so inject
+     * program exception to guest;
+     * Yes program exception NOT debug exception !!
+     * When QEMU is using debug resources then debug exception must
+     * be always set. To achieve this we set MSR_DE and also set
+     * MSRP_DEP so guest cannot change MSR_DE.
+     * When emulating debug resource for guest we want guest
+     * to control MSR_DE (enable/disable debug interrupt on need).
+     * Supporting both configurations are NOT possible.
+     * So the result is that we cannot share debug resources
+     * between QEMU and Guest on BOOKE architecture.
+     * In the current design QEMU gets the priority over guest,
+     * this means that if QEMU is using debug resources then guest
+     * cannot use them;
+     * For software breakpoint QEMU uses a privileged instruction;
+     * So there cannot be any reason that we are here for guest
+     * set debug exception, only possibility is guest executed a
+     * privileged / illegal instruction and that's why we are
+     * injecting a program interrupt.
+     */
+    cpu_synchronize_state(cs);
+    /*
+     * env->nip is PC, so increment this by 4 to use
+     * ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(), which set srr0 = env->nip - 4.
+     */
+    env->nip += 4;
+    cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM;
+    env->error_code = POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL;
+    ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(cs);
+
+    return 0;
 }
 
 int kvm_arch_handle_exit(CPUState *cs, struct kvm_run *run)