From patchwork Wed Jul 24 14:31:03 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Stefano Garzarella X-Patchwork-Id: 11057029 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A36138D for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86473284C3 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 7AC062882D; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:31:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B66E287FE for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52164 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqIJ8-0004Ur-ES for patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:31:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58733) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqIIa-0002SG-St for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:31:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqIIZ-00055X-LM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:31:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqIIZ-00053d-DU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:31:19 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EA6DC057F2E; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from steredhat.redhat.com (ovpn-117-46.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.46]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C89F60BEC; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:31:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Stefano Garzarella To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:31:03 +0200 Message-Id: <20190724143105.307042-2-sgarzare@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190724143105.307042-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> References: <20190724143105.307042-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:31:17 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/3] loader: Handle memory-mapped ELFs X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Eduardo Habkost , Sergio Lopez , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Julio Montes , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" , Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP This patch allows handling an ELF memory-mapped, taking care the reference count of the GMappedFile* passed through rom_add_elf_program(). In this case, the 'data' pointer is not heap-allocated, so we cannot free it. Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella --- v4: - fix the rom_add_elf_program() comment [Paolo] --- hw/core/loader.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- include/hw/elf_ops.h | 2 +- include/hw/loader.h | 5 +++-- 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/core/loader.c b/hw/core/loader.c index 425bf69a99..9fb93a6541 100644 --- a/hw/core/loader.c +++ b/hw/core/loader.c @@ -836,6 +836,7 @@ struct Rom { int isrom; char *fw_dir; char *fw_file; + GMappedFile *mapped_file; bool committed; @@ -846,10 +847,25 @@ struct Rom { static FWCfgState *fw_cfg; static QTAILQ_HEAD(, Rom) roms = QTAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(roms); -/* rom->data must be heap-allocated (do not use with rom_add_elf_program()) */ +/* + * rom->data can be heap-allocated or memory-mapped (e.g. when added with + * rom_add_elf_program()) + */ +static void rom_free_data(Rom *rom) +{ + if (rom->mapped_file) { + g_mapped_file_unref(rom->mapped_file); + rom->mapped_file = NULL; + } else { + g_free(rom->data); + } + + rom->data = NULL; +} + static void rom_free(Rom *rom) { - g_free(rom->data); + rom_free_data(rom); g_free(rom->path); g_free(rom->name); g_free(rom->fw_dir); @@ -1056,11 +1072,12 @@ MemoryRegion *rom_add_blob(const char *name, const void *blob, size_t len, /* This function is specific for elf program because we don't need to allocate * all the rom. We just allocate the first part and the rest is just zeros. This - * is why romsize and datasize are different. Also, this function seize the - * memory ownership of "data", so we don't have to allocate and copy the buffer. + * is why romsize and datasize are different. Also, this function takes its own + * reference to "mapped_file", so we don't have to allocate and copy the buffer. */ -int rom_add_elf_program(const char *name, void *data, size_t datasize, - size_t romsize, hwaddr addr, AddressSpace *as) +int rom_add_elf_program(const char *name, GMappedFile *mapped_file, void *data, + size_t datasize, size_t romsize, hwaddr addr, + AddressSpace *as) { Rom *rom; @@ -1071,6 +1088,12 @@ int rom_add_elf_program(const char *name, void *data, size_t datasize, rom->romsize = romsize; rom->data = data; rom->as = as; + + if (mapped_file && data) { + g_mapped_file_ref(mapped_file); + rom->mapped_file = mapped_file; + } + rom_insert(rom); return 0; } @@ -1105,8 +1128,7 @@ static void rom_reset(void *unused) } if (rom->isrom) { /* rom needs to be written only once */ - g_free(rom->data); - rom->data = NULL; + rom_free_data(rom); } /* * The rom loader is really on the same level as firmware in the guest diff --git a/include/hw/elf_ops.h b/include/hw/elf_ops.h index 690f9238c8..fede37ee9c 100644 --- a/include/hw/elf_ops.h +++ b/include/hw/elf_ops.h @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static int glue(load_elf, SZ)(const char *name, int fd, snprintf(label, sizeof(label), "phdr #%d: %s", i, name); /* rom_add_elf_program() seize the ownership of 'data' */ - rom_add_elf_program(label, data, file_size, mem_size, + rom_add_elf_program(label, NULL, data, file_size, mem_size, addr, as); } else { address_space_write(as ? as : &address_space_memory, diff --git a/include/hw/loader.h b/include/hw/loader.h index 3e1b3a4566..07fd9286e7 100644 --- a/include/hw/loader.h +++ b/include/hw/loader.h @@ -258,8 +258,9 @@ MemoryRegion *rom_add_blob(const char *name, const void *blob, size_t len, FWCfgCallback fw_callback, void *callback_opaque, AddressSpace *as, bool read_only); -int rom_add_elf_program(const char *name, void *data, size_t datasize, - size_t romsize, hwaddr addr, AddressSpace *as); +int rom_add_elf_program(const char *name, GMappedFile *mapped_file, void *data, + size_t datasize, size_t romsize, hwaddr addr, + AddressSpace *as); int rom_check_and_register_reset(void); void rom_set_fw(FWCfgState *f); void rom_set_order_override(int order);