Message ID | 20190925064534.19155-17-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | spapr: IRQ subsystem cleanups | expand |
On 25/09/2019 08:45, David Gibson wrote: > The irq claim and free paths for both XICS and XIVE check for some > validity conditions. Some of these represent genuine runtime failures, > however others - particularly checking that the basic irq number is in a > sane range - could only fail in the case of bugs in the callin code. > Therefore use assert()s instead of runtime failures for those. > > In addition the non backend-specific part of the claim/free paths should > only be used for PAPR external irqs, that is in the range SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE > to the maximum irq number. Put assert()s for that into the top level > dispatchers as well. > > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> > --- > hw/intc/spapr_xive.c | 8 ++------ > hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c b/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c > index c1c97192a7..47b5ec0b56 100644 > --- a/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c > +++ b/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c > @@ -532,9 +532,7 @@ bool spapr_xive_irq_claim(SpaprXive *xive, uint32_t lisn, bool lsi) > { > XiveSource *xsrc = &xive->source; > > - if (lisn >= xive->nr_irqs) { > - return false; > - } > + assert(lisn < xive->nr_irqs); > > /* > * Set default values when allocating an IRQ number > @@ -559,9 +557,7 @@ bool spapr_xive_irq_claim(SpaprXive *xive, uint32_t lisn, bool lsi) > > bool spapr_xive_irq_free(SpaprXive *xive, uint32_t lisn) > { > - if (lisn >= xive->nr_irqs) { > - return false; > - } > + assert(lisn < xive->nr_irqs); > > xive->eat[lisn].w &= cpu_to_be64(~EAS_VALID); > return true; > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c > index c40357a985..261d66ba17 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c > @@ -118,11 +118,7 @@ static int spapr_irq_claim_xics(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, bool lsi, > ICSState *ics = spapr->ics; > > assert(ics); > - > - if (!ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)) { > - error_setg(errp, "IRQ %d is invalid", irq); > - return -1; > - } > + assert(ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)); > > if (!ics_irq_free(ics, irq - ics->offset)) { > error_setg(errp, "IRQ %d is not free", irq); > @@ -138,9 +134,9 @@ static void spapr_irq_free_xics(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq) > ICSState *ics = spapr->ics; > uint32_t srcno = irq - ics->offset; > > - if (ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)) { > - memset(&ics->irqs[srcno], 0, sizeof(ICSIRQState)); > - } > + assert(ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)); > + > + memset(&ics->irqs[srcno], 0, sizeof(ICSIRQState)); > } > > static void spapr_irq_print_info_xics(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Monitor *mon) > @@ -628,6 +624,9 @@ void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp) > > int spapr_irq_claim(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, bool lsi, Error **errp) > { > + assert(irq >= SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE); > + assert(irq < (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE)); > + > return spapr->irq->claim(spapr, irq, lsi, errp); > } > > @@ -635,6 +634,9 @@ void spapr_irq_free(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num) > { > int i; > > + assert(irq >= SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE); > + assert((irq+num) <= (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE)); > + > for (i = irq; i < (irq + num); i++) { > spapr->irq->free(spapr, irq); > } >
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:45:30 +1000 David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote: > The irq claim and free paths for both XICS and XIVE check for some > validity conditions. Some of these represent genuine runtime failures, > however others - particularly checking that the basic irq number is in a > sane range - could only fail in the case of bugs in the callin code. > Therefore use assert()s instead of runtime failures for those. > > In addition the non backend-specific part of the claim/free paths should > only be used for PAPR external irqs, that is in the range SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE > to the maximum irq number. Put assert()s for that into the top level > dispatchers as well. > > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> > --- > hw/intc/spapr_xive.c | 8 ++------ > hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c b/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c > index c1c97192a7..47b5ec0b56 100644 > --- a/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c > +++ b/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c > @@ -532,9 +532,7 @@ bool spapr_xive_irq_claim(SpaprXive *xive, uint32_t lisn, bool lsi) > { > XiveSource *xsrc = &xive->source; > > - if (lisn >= xive->nr_irqs) { > - return false; > - } > + assert(lisn < xive->nr_irqs); > > /* > * Set default values when allocating an IRQ number > @@ -559,9 +557,7 @@ bool spapr_xive_irq_claim(SpaprXive *xive, uint32_t lisn, bool lsi) > > bool spapr_xive_irq_free(SpaprXive *xive, uint32_t lisn) > { > - if (lisn >= xive->nr_irqs) { > - return false; > - } > + assert(lisn < xive->nr_irqs); > > xive->eat[lisn].w &= cpu_to_be64(~EAS_VALID); > return true; > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c > index c40357a985..261d66ba17 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c > @@ -118,11 +118,7 @@ static int spapr_irq_claim_xics(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, bool lsi, > ICSState *ics = spapr->ics; > > assert(ics); > - > - if (!ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)) { > - error_setg(errp, "IRQ %d is invalid", irq); > - return -1; > - } > + assert(ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)); > > if (!ics_irq_free(ics, irq - ics->offset)) { > error_setg(errp, "IRQ %d is not free", irq); > @@ -138,9 +134,9 @@ static void spapr_irq_free_xics(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq) > ICSState *ics = spapr->ics; > uint32_t srcno = irq - ics->offset; > > - if (ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)) { > - memset(&ics->irqs[srcno], 0, sizeof(ICSIRQState)); > - } > + assert(ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)); > + > + memset(&ics->irqs[srcno], 0, sizeof(ICSIRQState)); > } > > static void spapr_irq_print_info_xics(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Monitor *mon) > @@ -628,6 +624,9 @@ void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp) > > int spapr_irq_claim(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, bool lsi, Error **errp) > { > + assert(irq >= SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE); > + assert(irq < (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE)); > + > return spapr->irq->claim(spapr, irq, lsi, errp); > } > > @@ -635,6 +634,9 @@ void spapr_irq_free(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num) > { > int i; > > + assert(irq >= SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE); > + assert((irq+num) <= (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE)); Non surprisingly this makes checkpatch unhappy: ERROR: spaces required around that '+' (ctx:VxV) #91: FILE: hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c:638: + assert((irq+num) <= (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE)); With that fixed, Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> > + > for (i = irq; i < (irq + num); i++) { > spapr->irq->free(spapr, irq); > }
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:08:41AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:45:30 +1000 > David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote: > > > The irq claim and free paths for both XICS and XIVE check for some > > validity conditions. Some of these represent genuine runtime failures, > > however others - particularly checking that the basic irq number is in a > > sane range - could only fail in the case of bugs in the callin code. > > Therefore use assert()s instead of runtime failures for those. > > > > In addition the non backend-specific part of the claim/free paths should > > only be used for PAPR external irqs, that is in the range SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE > > to the maximum irq number. Put assert()s for that into the top level > > dispatchers as well. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> > > --- > > hw/intc/spapr_xive.c | 8 ++------ > > hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- > > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c b/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c > > index c1c97192a7..47b5ec0b56 100644 > > --- a/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c > > +++ b/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c > > @@ -532,9 +532,7 @@ bool spapr_xive_irq_claim(SpaprXive *xive, uint32_t lisn, bool lsi) > > { > > XiveSource *xsrc = &xive->source; > > > > - if (lisn >= xive->nr_irqs) { > > - return false; > > - } > > + assert(lisn < xive->nr_irqs); > > > > /* > > * Set default values when allocating an IRQ number > > @@ -559,9 +557,7 @@ bool spapr_xive_irq_claim(SpaprXive *xive, uint32_t lisn, bool lsi) > > > > bool spapr_xive_irq_free(SpaprXive *xive, uint32_t lisn) > > { > > - if (lisn >= xive->nr_irqs) { > > - return false; > > - } > > + assert(lisn < xive->nr_irqs); > > > > xive->eat[lisn].w &= cpu_to_be64(~EAS_VALID); > > return true; > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c > > index c40357a985..261d66ba17 100644 > > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c > > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c > > @@ -118,11 +118,7 @@ static int spapr_irq_claim_xics(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, bool lsi, > > ICSState *ics = spapr->ics; > > > > assert(ics); > > - > > - if (!ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)) { > > - error_setg(errp, "IRQ %d is invalid", irq); > > - return -1; > > - } > > + assert(ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)); > > > > if (!ics_irq_free(ics, irq - ics->offset)) { > > error_setg(errp, "IRQ %d is not free", irq); > > @@ -138,9 +134,9 @@ static void spapr_irq_free_xics(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq) > > ICSState *ics = spapr->ics; > > uint32_t srcno = irq - ics->offset; > > > > - if (ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)) { > > - memset(&ics->irqs[srcno], 0, sizeof(ICSIRQState)); > > - } > > + assert(ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)); > > + > > + memset(&ics->irqs[srcno], 0, sizeof(ICSIRQState)); > > } > > > > static void spapr_irq_print_info_xics(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Monitor *mon) > > @@ -628,6 +624,9 @@ void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp) > > > > int spapr_irq_claim(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, bool lsi, Error **errp) > > { > > + assert(irq >= SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE); > > + assert(irq < (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE)); > > + > > return spapr->irq->claim(spapr, irq, lsi, errp); > > } > > > > @@ -635,6 +634,9 @@ void spapr_irq_free(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num) > > { > > int i; > > > > + assert(irq >= SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE); > > + assert((irq+num) <= (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE)); > > Non surprisingly this makes checkpatch unhappy: > > ERROR: spaces required around that '+' (ctx:VxV) > #91: FILE: hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c:638: > + assert((irq+num) <= (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE)); Oops, fixed. I hadn't done a checkpatch run yet, since I'm still working actively on the series. > > With that fixed, > > Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> > > > + > > for (i = irq; i < (irq + num); i++) { > > spapr->irq->free(spapr, irq); > > } >
diff --git a/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c b/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c index c1c97192a7..47b5ec0b56 100644 --- a/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c +++ b/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c @@ -532,9 +532,7 @@ bool spapr_xive_irq_claim(SpaprXive *xive, uint32_t lisn, bool lsi) { XiveSource *xsrc = &xive->source; - if (lisn >= xive->nr_irqs) { - return false; - } + assert(lisn < xive->nr_irqs); /* * Set default values when allocating an IRQ number @@ -559,9 +557,7 @@ bool spapr_xive_irq_claim(SpaprXive *xive, uint32_t lisn, bool lsi) bool spapr_xive_irq_free(SpaprXive *xive, uint32_t lisn) { - if (lisn >= xive->nr_irqs) { - return false; - } + assert(lisn < xive->nr_irqs); xive->eat[lisn].w &= cpu_to_be64(~EAS_VALID); return true; diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c index c40357a985..261d66ba17 100644 --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c @@ -118,11 +118,7 @@ static int spapr_irq_claim_xics(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, bool lsi, ICSState *ics = spapr->ics; assert(ics); - - if (!ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)) { - error_setg(errp, "IRQ %d is invalid", irq); - return -1; - } + assert(ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)); if (!ics_irq_free(ics, irq - ics->offset)) { error_setg(errp, "IRQ %d is not free", irq); @@ -138,9 +134,9 @@ static void spapr_irq_free_xics(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq) ICSState *ics = spapr->ics; uint32_t srcno = irq - ics->offset; - if (ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)) { - memset(&ics->irqs[srcno], 0, sizeof(ICSIRQState)); - } + assert(ics_valid_irq(ics, irq)); + + memset(&ics->irqs[srcno], 0, sizeof(ICSIRQState)); } static void spapr_irq_print_info_xics(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Monitor *mon) @@ -628,6 +624,9 @@ void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp) int spapr_irq_claim(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, bool lsi, Error **errp) { + assert(irq >= SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE); + assert(irq < (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE)); + return spapr->irq->claim(spapr, irq, lsi, errp); } @@ -635,6 +634,9 @@ void spapr_irq_free(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num) { int i; + assert(irq >= SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE); + assert((irq+num) <= (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE)); + for (i = irq; i < (irq + num); i++) { spapr->irq->free(spapr, irq); }
The irq claim and free paths for both XICS and XIVE check for some validity conditions. Some of these represent genuine runtime failures, however others - particularly checking that the basic irq number is in a sane range - could only fail in the case of bugs in the callin code. Therefore use assert()s instead of runtime failures for those. In addition the non backend-specific part of the claim/free paths should only be used for PAPR external irqs, that is in the range SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE to the maximum irq number. Put assert()s for that into the top level dispatchers as well. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> --- hw/intc/spapr_xive.c | 8 ++------ hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)