diff mbox series

target/i386/hax-posix: fix two 'format-truncation' compile warnings

Message ID 20200224065139.19567-1-pannengyuan@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series target/i386/hax-posix: fix two 'format-truncation' compile warnings | expand

Commit Message

Pan Nengyuan Feb. 24, 2020, 6:51 a.m. UTC
From: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>

Fix compile warnings:
/mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/target/i386/hax-posix.c:124:56: error: ‘%02d’ directive output may be truncated writing between 2 and 11 bytes into a region of size 3 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
     snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VM_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm/vm%02d", vm_id);
                                                        ^~~~
/mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/target/i386/hax-posix.c:124:41: note: directive argument in the range [-2147483648, 64]
     snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VM_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm/vm%02d", vm_id);
                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:873,
                 from /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:99,
                 from /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/target/i386/hax-posix.c:14:
/usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:67:10: note: ‘__builtin___snprintf_chk’ output between 17 and 26 bytes into a destination of size 17
   return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1,
          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        __bos (__s), __fmt, __va_arg_pack ());
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/target/i386/hax-posix.c: In function ‘hax_vcpu_devfs_string’:
/mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/target/i386/hax-posix.c:143:55: error: ‘%02d’ directive output may be truncated writing between 2 and 11 bytes into a region of size 10 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
     snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VCPU_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm%02d/vcpu%02d",
                                                       ^~~~
/mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/target/i386/hax-posix.c:143:43: note: directive argument in the range [-2147483648, 64]
     snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VCPU_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm%02d/vcpu%02d",
                                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/target/i386/hax-posix.c:143:43: note: directive argument in the range [-2147483648, 64]
In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:873,
                 from /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:99,
                 from /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/target/i386/hax-posix.c:14:
/usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:67:10: note: ‘__builtin___snprintf_chk’ output between 21 and 39 bytes into a destination of size 21
   return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1,
          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        __bos (__s), __fmt, __va_arg_pack ());

We know that we have checked the vm_id and vcpu_id in the first(less than 0x40), it will never be truncated in snprintf().
Thus, this patch add an assertion to clear this false-positive warning.

Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
---
 target/i386/hax-posix.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Laurent Vivier March 3, 2020, 10:14 a.m. UTC | #1
Le 24/02/2020 à 07:51, pannengyuan@huawei.com a écrit :
> From: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
> 
> Fix compile warnings:
> /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/target/i386/hax-posix.c:124:56: error: ‘%02d’ directive output may be truncated writing between 2 and 11 bytes into a region of size 3 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
>      snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VM_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm/vm%02d", vm_id);
>                                                         ^~~~
> /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/target/i386/hax-posix.c:124:41: note: directive argument in the range [-2147483648, 64]
>      snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VM_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm/vm%02d", vm_id);
>                                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:873,
>                  from /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:99,
>                  from /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/target/i386/hax-posix.c:14:
> /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:67:10: note: ‘__builtin___snprintf_chk’ output between 17 and 26 bytes into a destination of size 17
>    return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1,
>           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>         __bos (__s), __fmt, __va_arg_pack ());
>         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/target/i386/hax-posix.c: In function ‘hax_vcpu_devfs_string’:
> /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/target/i386/hax-posix.c:143:55: error: ‘%02d’ directive output may be truncated writing between 2 and 11 bytes into a region of size 10 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
>      snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VCPU_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm%02d/vcpu%02d",
>                                                        ^~~~
> /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/target/i386/hax-posix.c:143:43: note: directive argument in the range [-2147483648, 64]
>      snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VCPU_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm%02d/vcpu%02d",
>                                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/target/i386/hax-posix.c:143:43: note: directive argument in the range [-2147483648, 64]
> In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:873,
>                  from /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:99,
>                  from /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/target/i386/hax-posix.c:14:
> /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:67:10: note: ‘__builtin___snprintf_chk’ output between 21 and 39 bytes into a destination of size 21
>    return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1,
>           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>         __bos (__s), __fmt, __va_arg_pack ());
> 
> We know that we have checked the vm_id and vcpu_id in the first(less than 0x40), it will never be truncated in snprintf().
> Thus, this patch add an assertion to clear this false-positive warning.
> 
> Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
> ---
>  target/i386/hax-posix.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/i386/hax-posix.c b/target/i386/hax-posix.c
> index a5426a6dac..197d5bc0f9 100644
> --- a/target/i386/hax-posix.c
> +++ b/target/i386/hax-posix.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,8 @@ static char *hax_vm_devfs_string(int vm_id)
>          return NULL;
>      }
>  
> -    snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VM_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm/vm%02d", vm_id);
> +    int len = snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VM_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm/vm%02d", vm_id);
> +    assert(len < sizeof HAX_VM_DEVFS);
>      return name;
>  }
>  
> @@ -140,8 +141,9 @@ static char *hax_vcpu_devfs_string(int vm_id, int vcpu_id)
>          return NULL;
>      }
>  
> -    snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VCPU_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm%02d/vcpu%02d",
> -             vm_id, vcpu_id);
> +    int len = snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VCPU_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm%02d/vcpu%02d",
> +                       vm_id, vcpu_id);
> +    assert(len < sizeof HAX_VCPU_DEVFS);
>      return name;
>  }
>  
> 

You should check instead that vm_id and vcpu_id are >= 0 where they are
checked to be <= MAX_VM_ID and MAX_VCPU_ID, this will avoid the overflow
of "%02d" and should remove the compile warning.

Thanks,
Laurent
Paolo Bonzini March 3, 2020, 10:47 a.m. UTC | #2
On 24/02/20 07:51, pannengyuan@huawei.com wrote:
> diff --git a/target/i386/hax-posix.c b/target/i386/hax-posix.c
> index a5426a6dac..197d5bc0f9 100644
> --- a/target/i386/hax-posix.c
> +++ b/target/i386/hax-posix.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,8 @@ static char *hax_vm_devfs_string(int vm_id)
>          return NULL;
>      }
>  
> -    snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VM_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm/vm%02d", vm_id);
> +    int len = snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VM_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm/vm%02d", vm_id);
> +    assert(len < sizeof HAX_VM_DEVFS);
>      return name;
>  }
>  
> @@ -140,8 +141,9 @@ static char *hax_vcpu_devfs_string(int vm_id, int vcpu_id)
>          return NULL;
>      }
>  
> -    snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VCPU_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm%02d/vcpu%02d",
> -             vm_id, vcpu_id);
> +    int len = snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VCPU_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm%02d/vcpu%02d",
> +                       vm_id, vcpu_id);
> +    assert(len < sizeof HAX_VCPU_DEVFS);
>      return name;
>  }
>  
> 

Julio Faracco has posted a fix for the same bug.  The best change is
actually to switch to g_strdup_printf.

Paolo
Pan Nengyuan March 3, 2020, 10:58 a.m. UTC | #3
On 3/3/2020 6:47 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 24/02/20 07:51, pannengyuan@huawei.com wrote:
>> diff --git a/target/i386/hax-posix.c b/target/i386/hax-posix.c
>> index a5426a6dac..197d5bc0f9 100644
>> --- a/target/i386/hax-posix.c
>> +++ b/target/i386/hax-posix.c
>> @@ -121,7 +121,8 @@ static char *hax_vm_devfs_string(int vm_id)
>>          return NULL;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VM_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm/vm%02d", vm_id);
>> +    int len = snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VM_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm/vm%02d", vm_id);
>> +    assert(len < sizeof HAX_VM_DEVFS);
>>      return name;
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -140,8 +141,9 @@ static char *hax_vcpu_devfs_string(int vm_id, int vcpu_id)
>>          return NULL;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VCPU_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm%02d/vcpu%02d",
>> -             vm_id, vcpu_id);
>> +    int len = snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VCPU_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm%02d/vcpu%02d",
>> +                       vm_id, vcpu_id);
>> +    assert(len < sizeof HAX_VCPU_DEVFS);
>>      return name;
>>  }
>>  
>>
> 
> Julio Faracco has posted a fix for the same bug.  The best change is
> actually to switch to g_strdup_printf.

Okay, Thanks.

> 
> Paolo
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/target/i386/hax-posix.c b/target/i386/hax-posix.c
index a5426a6dac..197d5bc0f9 100644
--- a/target/i386/hax-posix.c
+++ b/target/i386/hax-posix.c
@@ -121,7 +121,8 @@  static char *hax_vm_devfs_string(int vm_id)
         return NULL;
     }
 
-    snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VM_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm/vm%02d", vm_id);
+    int len = snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VM_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm/vm%02d", vm_id);
+    assert(len < sizeof HAX_VM_DEVFS);
     return name;
 }
 
@@ -140,8 +141,9 @@  static char *hax_vcpu_devfs_string(int vm_id, int vcpu_id)
         return NULL;
     }
 
-    snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VCPU_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm%02d/vcpu%02d",
-             vm_id, vcpu_id);
+    int len = snprintf(name, sizeof HAX_VCPU_DEVFS, "/dev/hax_vm%02d/vcpu%02d",
+                       vm_id, vcpu_id);
+    assert(len < sizeof HAX_VCPU_DEVFS);
     return name;
 }