diff mbox series

[v2,1/2] s390x: pv: Remove sclp boundary checks

Message ID 20201022103135.126033-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series s390x: pv: Diag318 fixes | expand

Commit Message

Janosch Frank Oct. 22, 2020, 10:31 a.m. UTC 
The SCLP boundary cross check is done by the Ultravisor for a
protected guest, hence we don't need to do it. As QEMU doesn't get a
valid SCCB address in protected mode this is even problematic and can
lead to QEMU reporting a false boundary cross error.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
Fixes: db13387ca0 ("s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary checks")
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
---
 hw/s390x/sclp.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
index 00f1e4648d..0cf2290826 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
@@ -285,11 +285,6 @@  int sclp_service_call_protected(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb,
         goto out_write;
     }
 
-    if (!sccb_verify_boundary(sccb, be16_to_cpu(work_sccb->h.length), code)) {
-        work_sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
-        goto out_write;
-    }
-
     sclp_c->execute(sclp, work_sccb, code);
 out_write:
     s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(env_archcpu(env), 0, work_sccb,