| Message ID | 20201126111109.112238-5-alex.chen@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | hw/misc: Fix some bad printf format specifiers | expand |
diff --git a/hw/misc/imx6ul_ccm.c b/hw/misc/imx6ul_ccm.c index 5e0661dacf..a65d031455 100644 --- a/hw/misc/imx6ul_ccm.c +++ b/hw/misc/imx6ul_ccm.c @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static const char *imx6ul_ccm_reg_name(uint32_t reg) case CCM_CMEOR: return "CMEOR"; default: - sprintf(unknown, "%d ?", reg); + sprintf(unknown, "%u ?", reg); return unknown; } } @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static const char *imx6ul_analog_reg_name(uint32_t reg) case USB_ANALOG_DIGPROG: return "USB_ANALOG_DIGPROG"; default: - sprintf(unknown, "%d ?", reg); + sprintf(unknown, "%u ?", reg); return unknown; } }
We should use printf format specifier "%u" instead of "%d" for argument of type "unsigned int". Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com> --- hw/misc/imx6ul_ccm.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)