From patchwork Tue Feb 2 04:13:15 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: David Gibson X-Patchwork-Id: 12060617 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804F2C433DB for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 04:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E0564ED4 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 04:24:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D9E0564ED4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gibson.dropbear.id.au Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:47174 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6nEc-0003Kq-VV for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 23:24:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6n4W-0006F6-En; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 23:13:48 -0500 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:53551 helo=ozlabs.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6n4U-00051T-8t; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 23:13:48 -0500 Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 4DVBJ06hThz9tlJ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:13:20 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gibson.dropbear.id.au; s=201602; t=1612239200; bh=1tcpSl1vEkuzahpE4DsJZZYgjtMyMGtv6TKAz9btZq0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CsMINId06ilbx2Ogwd719nsMOYMb1Du3DEWpa6tLssfSMtN52BcL0jfGAguJfZN2r bdB6vJIp9pYyTC+2YOGGy8xg2bQbPN4rr8wLoplV8O4rd844EG8smPKfv80EM7Eh8X kIjIdkswc9BGDMK1dK84wfIPaZhBlpwktI74w2B4= From: David Gibson To: dgilbert@redhat.com, pair@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, brijesh.singh@amd.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v8 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:13:15 +1100 Message-Id: <20210202041315.196530-14-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20210202041315.196530-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> References: <20210202041315.196530-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=203.11.71.1; envelope-from=dgibson@ozlabs.org; helo=ozlabs.org X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: thuth@redhat.com, Cornelia Huck , berrange@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , jun.nakajima@intel.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Eduardo Habkost , Greg Kurz , pragyansri.pathi@intel.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, andi.kleen@intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" At least some s390 cpu models support "Protected Virtualization" (PV), a mechanism to protect guests from eavesdropping by a compromised hypervisor. This is similar in function to other mechanisms like AMD's SEV and POWER's PEF, which are controlled by the "confidential-guest-support" machine option. s390 is a slightly special case, because we already supported PV, simply by using a CPU model with the required feature (S390_FEAT_UNPACK). To integrate this with the option used by other platforms, we implement the following compromise: - When the confidential-guest-support option is set, s390 will recognize it, verify that the CPU can support PV (failing if not) and set virtio default options necessary for encrypted or protected guests, as on other platforms. i.e. if confidential-guest-support is set, we will either create a guest capable of entering PV mode, or fail outright. - If confidential-guest-support is not set, guests might still be able to enter PV mode, if the CPU has the right model. This may be a little surprising, but shouldn't actually be harmful. To start a guest supporting Protected Virtualization using the new option use the command line arguments: -object s390-pv-guest,id=pv0 -machine confidential-guest-support=pv0 Signed-off-by: David Gibson Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger --- docs/confidential-guest-support.txt | 3 ++ docs/system/s390x/protvirt.rst | 19 ++++++--- hw/s390x/pv.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 3 ++ include/hw/s390x/pv.h | 17 ++++++++ 5 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/confidential-guest-support.txt b/docs/confidential-guest-support.txt index 4da4c91bd3..71d07ba57a 100644 --- a/docs/confidential-guest-support.txt +++ b/docs/confidential-guest-support.txt @@ -43,4 +43,7 @@ AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) POWER Protected Execution Facility (PEF) docs/papr-pef.txt +s390x Protected Virtualization (PV) + docs/system/s390x/protvirt.rst + Other mechanisms may be supported in future. diff --git a/docs/system/s390x/protvirt.rst b/docs/system/s390x/protvirt.rst index 712974ad87..0f481043d9 100644 --- a/docs/system/s390x/protvirt.rst +++ b/docs/system/s390x/protvirt.rst @@ -22,15 +22,22 @@ If those requirements are met, the capability `KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED` will indicate that KVM can support PVMs on that LPAR. -QEMU Settings -------------- +Running a Protected Virtual Machine +----------------------------------- -To indicate to the VM that it can transition into protected mode, the +To run a PVM you will need to select a CPU model which includes the `Unpack facility` (stfle bit 161 represented by the feature -`unpack`/`S390_FEAT_UNPACK`) needs to be part of the cpu model of -the VM. +`unpack`/`S390_FEAT_UNPACK`), and add these options to the command line:: + + -object s390-pv-guest,id=pv0 \ + -machine confidential-guest-support=pv0 + +Adding these options will: + +* Ensure the `unpack` facility is available +* Enable the IOMMU by default for all I/O devices +* Initialize the PV mechanism -All I/O devices need to use the IOMMU. Passthrough (vfio) devices are currently not supported. Host huge page backings are not supported. However guests can use huge diff --git a/hw/s390x/pv.c b/hw/s390x/pv.c index ab3a2482aa..93eccfc05d 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/pv.c +++ b/hw/s390x/pv.c @@ -14,8 +14,11 @@ #include #include "cpu.h" +#include "qapi/error.h" #include "qemu/error-report.h" #include "sysemu/kvm.h" +#include "qom/object_interfaces.h" +#include "exec/confidential-guest-support.h" #include "hw/s390x/ipl.h" #include "hw/s390x/pv.h" @@ -111,3 +114,62 @@ void s390_pv_inject_reset_error(CPUState *cs) /* Report that we are unable to enter protected mode */ env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_INVAL_FOR_PV; } + +#define TYPE_S390_PV_GUEST "s390-pv-guest" +OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(S390PVGuest, S390_PV_GUEST) + +/** + * S390PVGuest: + * + * The S390PVGuest object is basically a dummy used to tell the + * confidential guest support system to use s390's PV mechanism. + * + * # $QEMU \ + * -object s390-pv-guest,id=pv0 \ + * -machine ...,confidential-guest-support=pv0 + */ +struct S390PVGuest { + ConfidentialGuestSupport parent_obj; +}; + +typedef struct S390PVGuestClass S390PVGuestClass; + +struct S390PVGuestClass { + ConfidentialGuestSupportClass parent_class; +}; + +int s390_pv_kvm_init(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp) +{ + if (!object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(cgs), TYPE_S390_PV_GUEST)) { + return 0; + } + + if (!s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_UNPACK)) { + error_setg(errp, + "CPU model does not support Protected Virtualization"); + return -1; + } + + cgs->ready = true; + + return 0; +} + +OBJECT_DEFINE_TYPE_WITH_INTERFACES(S390PVGuest, + s390_pv_guest, + S390_PV_GUEST, + CONFIDENTIAL_GUEST_SUPPORT, + { TYPE_USER_CREATABLE }, + { NULL }) + +static void s390_pv_guest_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) +{ +} + +static void s390_pv_guest_init(Object *obj) +{ +} + +static void s390_pv_guest_finalize(Object *obj) +{ +} diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c index a2d9a79c84..2972b607f3 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c @@ -250,6 +250,9 @@ static void ccw_init(MachineState *machine) /* init CPUs (incl. CPU model) early so s390_has_feature() works */ s390_init_cpus(machine); + /* Need CPU model to be determined before we can set up PV */ + s390_pv_init(machine->cgs, &error_fatal); + s390_flic_init(); /* init the SIGP facility */ diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/pv.h b/include/hw/s390x/pv.h index aee758bc2d..1f1f545bfc 100644 --- a/include/hw/s390x/pv.h +++ b/include/hw/s390x/pv.h @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@ #ifndef HW_S390_PV_H #define HW_S390_PV_H +#include "qapi/error.h" +#include "sysemu/kvm.h" + #ifdef CONFIG_KVM #include "cpu.h" #include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h" @@ -55,4 +58,18 @@ static inline void s390_pv_unshare(void) {} static inline void s390_pv_inject_reset_error(CPUState *cs) {}; #endif /* CONFIG_KVM */ +int s390_pv_kvm_init(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp); +static inline int s390_pv_init(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp) +{ + if (!cgs) { + return 0; + } + if (kvm_enabled()) { + return s390_pv_kvm_init(cgs, errp); + } + + error_setg(errp, "Protected Virtualization requires KVM"); + return -1; +} + #endif /* HW_S390_PV_H */