From patchwork Wed Feb 24 09:49:04 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: David Hildenbrand X-Patchwork-Id: 12101603 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363B5C433E6 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6240464DE7 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:56:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6240464DE7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:51848 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEquQ-0000LF-5C for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:56:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEqpW-0003VQ-Gm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:51:38 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:24854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEqpU-000875-Er for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:51:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1614160294; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UMk3TlOXfTXqdvv7QCiPRS31fFoCHPmdvnhXqpr7p6w=; b=iySyRBC/xaIJ7wFb2AJk3gc0Al9TPy5ojVGHTyae1aJFReVuNsz1n5oOYXUEibtgOorkwH dBhVBM9x5IWYewaP41UbujEQ9UPwmib64gxb7sYGHfQrrdaUVbIuADtA4i6q4TboKDviZA y7YiSG2cOLICB3PwyJfgd5CDRmyNUP4= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-8-o8p7opFpP_iARyTZAQOxgA-1; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:50:58 -0500 X-MC-Unique: o8p7opFpP_iARyTZAQOxgA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60546801985; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t480s.redhat.com (ovpn-114-83.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.83]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B386F7E9; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:50:49 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH v7 08/13] vfio: Sanity check maximum number of DMA mappings with RamDiscardManager Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:49:04 +0100 Message-Id: <20210224094910.44986-9-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20210224094910.44986-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20210224094910.44986-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=david@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Pankaj Gupta , Wei Yang , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , David Hildenbrand , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" , Peter Xu , Auger Eric , Alex Williamson , teawater , Igor Mammedov , Paolo Bonzini , Marek Kedzierski Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Although RamDiscardManager can handle running into the maximum number of DMA mappings by propagating errors when creating a DMA mapping, we want to sanity check and warn the user early that there is a theoretical setup issue and that virtio-mem might not be able to provide as much memory towards a VM as desired. As suggested by Alex, let's use the number of KVM memory slots to guess how many other mappings we might see over time. Acked-by: Alex Williamson Reviewed-by: Alex Williamson Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin Cc: Paolo Bonzini Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Alex Williamson Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert Cc: Igor Mammedov Cc: Pankaj Gupta Cc: Peter Xu Cc: Auger Eric Cc: Wei Yang Cc: teawater Cc: Marek Kedzierski Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- hw/vfio/common.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c index 2f20075b8c..66091fd306 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/common.c +++ b/hw/vfio/common.c @@ -733,6 +733,49 @@ static void vfio_register_ram_discard_listener(VFIOContainer *container, vfio_ram_discard_notify_discard, true); ram_discard_manager_register_listener(rdm, &vrdl->listener, section); QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&container->vrdl_list, vrdl, next); + + /* + * Sanity-check if we have a theoretically problematic setup where we could + * exceed the maximum number of possible DMA mappings over time. We assume + * that each mapped section in the same address space as a RamDiscardManager + * section consumes exactly one DMA mapping, with the exception of + * RamDiscardManager sections; i.e., we don't expect to have gIOMMU sections + * in the same address space as RamDiscardManager sections. + * + * We assume that each section in the address space consumes one memslot. + * We take the number of KVM memory slots as a best guess for the maximum + * number of sections in the address space we could have over time, + * also consuming DMA mappings. + */ + if (container->dma_max_mappings) { + unsigned int vrdl_count = 0, vrdl_mappings = 0, max_memslots = 512; + +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM + if (kvm_enabled()) { + max_memslots = kvm_get_max_memslots(); + } +#endif + + QLIST_FOREACH(vrdl, &container->vrdl_list, next) { + hwaddr start, end; + + start = QEMU_ALIGN_DOWN(vrdl->offset_within_address_space, + vrdl->granularity); + end = ROUND_UP(vrdl->offset_within_address_space + vrdl->size, + vrdl->granularity); + vrdl_mappings += (end - start) / vrdl->granularity; + vrdl_count++; + } + + if (vrdl_mappings + max_memslots - vrdl_count > + container->dma_max_mappings) { + warn_report("%s: possibly running out of DMA mappings. E.g., try" + " increasing the 'block-size' of virtio-mem devies." + " Maximum possible DMA mappings: %d, Maximum possible" + " memslots: %d", __func__, container->dma_max_mappings, + max_memslots); + } + } } static void vfio_unregister_ram_discard_listener(VFIOContainer *container,