From patchwork Thu Sep 2 11:03:21 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yanan Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 12471279 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7071C432BE for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 11:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C4AB60F56 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 11:11:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 8C4AB60F56 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:38696 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLkck-000202-Ol for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:11:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLkVa-0006yc-8p; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:03:50 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:3125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLkVV-0003bL-5y; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:03:49 -0400 Received: from dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4H0dGg5NWcz8xdm; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 18:59:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500023.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.83) by dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 19:03:39 +0800 Received: from DESKTOP-TMVL5KK.china.huawei.com (10.174.187.128) by dggpemm500023.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.83) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 19:03:38 +0800 From: Yanan Wang To: Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , , , , Subject: [PATCH v8 05/14] machine: Improve the error reporting of smp parsing Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 19:03:21 +0800 Message-ID: <20210902110330.18036-6-wangyanan55@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.4.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20210902110330.18036-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com> References: <20210902110330.18036-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.174.187.128] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpemm500023.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.83) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.188; envelope-from=wangyanan55@huawei.com; helo=szxga02-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Andrew Jones , Cornelia Huck , =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P_=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= , Pierre Morel , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Pankaj Gupta , Greg Kurz , Yanan Wang , wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, Thomas Huth , Paolo Bonzini , David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" We have two requirements for a valid SMP configuration: the product of "sockets * cores * threads" must represent all the possible cpus, i.e., max_cpus, and then must include the initially present cpus, i.e., smp_cpus. So we only need to ensure 1) "sockets * cores * threads == maxcpus" at first and then ensure 2) "maxcpus >= cpus". With a reasonable order of the sanity check, we can simplify the error reporting code. When reporting an error message we also report the exact value of each topology member to make users easily see what's going on. Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta --- hw/core/machine.c | 22 +++++++++------------- hw/i386/pc.c | 24 ++++++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c index fe935cb4a3..f1b30b3101 100644 --- a/hw/core/machine.c +++ b/hw/core/machine.c @@ -782,25 +782,21 @@ static void smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **errp) maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : sockets * cores * threads; cpus = cpus > 0 ? cpus : maxcpus; - if (sockets * cores * threads < cpus) { - error_setg(errp, "cpu topology: " - "sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) < " - "smp_cpus (%u)", - sockets, cores, threads, cpus); + if (sockets * cores * threads != maxcpus) { + error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: " + "product of the hierarchy must match maxcpus: " + "sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) " + "!= maxcpus (%u)", + sockets, cores, threads, maxcpus); return; } if (maxcpus < cpus) { - error_setg(errp, "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp"); - return; - } - - if (sockets * cores * threads != maxcpus) { error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: " + "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp: " "sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) " - "!= maxcpus (%u)", - sockets, cores, threads, - maxcpus); + "== maxcpus (%u) < smp_cpus (%u)", + sockets, cores, threads, maxcpus, cpus); return; } diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c index cf75fa5c7a..19dbe28d12 100644 --- a/hw/i386/pc.c +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c @@ -749,25 +749,21 @@ static void pc_smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **err maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : sockets * dies * cores * threads; cpus = cpus > 0 ? cpus : maxcpus; - if (sockets * dies * cores * threads < cpus) { - error_setg(errp, "cpu topology: " - "sockets (%u) * dies (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) < " - "smp_cpus (%u)", - sockets, dies, cores, threads, cpus); + if (sockets * dies * cores * threads != maxcpus) { + error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: " + "product of the hierarchy must match maxcpus: " + "sockets (%u) * dies (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) " + "!= maxcpus (%u)", + sockets, dies, cores, threads, maxcpus); return; } if (maxcpus < cpus) { - error_setg(errp, "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp"); - return; - } - - if (sockets * dies * cores * threads != maxcpus) { - error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology deprecated: " + error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: " + "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp: " "sockets (%u) * dies (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) " - "!= maxcpus (%u)", - sockets, dies, cores, threads, - maxcpus); + "== maxcpus (%u) < smp_cpus (%u)", + sockets, dies, cores, threads, maxcpus, cpus); return; }