@@ -99,18 +99,26 @@ static void test_clone_empty(void)
static void test_clone_complex1(void)
{
- UserDefListUnion *src, *dst;
+ UserDefFlatUnion *src, *dst;
- src = g_new0(UserDefListUnion, 1);
- src->type = USER_DEF_LIST_UNION_KIND_STRING;
+ src = g_new0(UserDefFlatUnion, 1);
+ src->integer = 123;
+ src->string = g_strdup("abc");
+ src->enum1 = ENUM_ONE_VALUE1;
+ src->u.value1.boolean = true;
- dst = QAPI_CLONE(UserDefListUnion, src);
+ dst = QAPI_CLONE(UserDefFlatUnion, src);
g_assert(dst);
- g_assert_cmpint(dst->type, ==, src->type);
- g_assert(!dst->u.string.data);
- qapi_free_UserDefListUnion(src);
- qapi_free_UserDefListUnion(dst);
+ g_assert_cmpint(dst->integer, ==, 123);
+ g_assert_cmpstr(dst->string, ==, "abc");
+ g_assert_cmpint(dst->enum1, ==, ENUM_ONE_VALUE1);
+ g_assert(dst->u.value1.boolean);
+ g_assert(!dst->u.value1.has_a_b);
+ g_assert_cmpint(dst->u.value1.a_b, ==, 0);
+
+ qapi_free_UserDefFlatUnion(src);
+ qapi_free_UserDefFlatUnion(dst);
}
static void test_clone_complex2(void)
test_clone_complex1() uses simple union UserDefListUnion to cover unions. Use UserDefFlatUnion instead. Arrays are still covered by test_clone_complex3(). Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> --- tests/unit/test-clone-visitor.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)