From patchwork Wed Oct 20 14:21:18 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yanan Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 12572545 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0428C433F5 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 589B96112D for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:34:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 589B96112D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:39688 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mdCfx-0001I0-CS for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:34:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45600) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mdCTK-0006sp-58; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:21:39 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:3159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mdCTH-0002A2-1E; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:21:37 -0400 Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4HZCN04fctz90Lj; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 22:16:32 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500023.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.83) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.15; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 22:21:28 +0800 Received: from DESKTOP-TMVL5KK.china.huawei.com (10.174.187.128) by dggpemm500023.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.83) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.15; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 22:21:28 +0800 From: Yanan Wang To: Peter Maydell , Richard Henderson , Eric Auger , Andrew Jones , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Igor Mammedov Subject: [PATCH v9 1/8] hw/arm/virt: Only describe cpu topology since virt-6.2 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 22:21:18 +0800 Message-ID: <20211020142125.7516-2-wangyanan55@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.4.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20211020142125.7516-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com> References: <20211020142125.7516-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.174.187.128] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpemm500023.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.83) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.188; envelope-from=wangyanan55@huawei.com; helo=szxga02-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Yanan Wang , Shannon Zhao , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Alistair Francis , wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On existing older machine types, without cpu topology described in ACPI or DT, the guest will populate one by default. With the topology described, it will read the information and set up its topology as instructed, but that may not be the same as what was getting used by default. It's possible that an user application has a dependency on the default topology and if the default one gets changed it will probably behave differently. Based on above consideration we'd better only describe topology information to the guest on 6.2 and later machine types. Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones --- hw/arm/virt.c | 1 + include/hw/arm/virt.h | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c index 4160d49688..15e8d8cf4a 100644 --- a/hw/arm/virt.c +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c @@ -2816,6 +2816,7 @@ static void virt_machine_6_1_options(MachineClass *mc) virt_machine_6_2_options(mc); compat_props_add(mc->compat_props, hw_compat_6_1, hw_compat_6_1_len); mc->smp_props.prefer_sockets = true; + vmc->no_cpu_topology = true; /* qemu ITS was introduced with 6.2 */ vmc->no_tcg_its = true; diff --git a/include/hw/arm/virt.h b/include/hw/arm/virt.h index b461b8d261..dc6b66ffc8 100644 --- a/include/hw/arm/virt.h +++ b/include/hw/arm/virt.h @@ -125,11 +125,13 @@ struct VirtMachineClass { bool claim_edge_triggered_timers; bool smbios_old_sys_ver; bool no_highmem_ecam; - bool no_ged; /* Machines < 4.2 has no support for ACPI GED device */ + bool no_ged; /* Machines < 4.2 have no support for ACPI GED device */ bool kvm_no_adjvtime; bool no_kvm_steal_time; bool acpi_expose_flash; bool no_secure_gpio; + /* Machines < 6.2 have no support for describing cpu topology to guest */ + bool no_cpu_topology; }; struct VirtMachineState {