From patchwork Wed Nov 24 17:25:22 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Lucas Mateus Martins Araujo e Castro X-Patchwork-Id: 12637221 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A665AC433F5 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 17:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47544 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mpw5V-0005UO-CJ for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:29:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58952) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mpw2h-0000p9-4E; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:26:47 -0500 Received: from [201.28.113.2] (port=53237 helo=outlook.eldorado.org.br) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mpw2f-0008FR-KO; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:26:46 -0500 Received: from power9a ([10.10.71.235]) by outlook.eldorado.org.br with Microsoft SMTPSVC(8.5.9600.16384); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:25:30 -0300 Received: from eldorado.org.br (unknown [10.10.71.29]) by power9a (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F33800A92; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:25:30 -0300 (-03) From: "Lucas Mateus Castro (alqotel)" To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] test/tcg/ppc64le: test mtfsf Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:25:22 -0300 Message-Id: <20211124172523.3598396-3-lucas.araujo@eldorado.org.br> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20211124172523.3598396-1-lucas.araujo@eldorado.org.br> References: <20211124172523.3598396-1-lucas.araujo@eldorado.org.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Nov 2021 17:25:30.0838 (UTC) FILETIME=[47C7FF60:01D7E158] X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 201.28.113.2 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=201.28.113.2; envelope-from=lucas.araujo@eldorado.org.br; helo=outlook.eldorado.org.br X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: richard.henderson@linaro.org, danielhb413@gmail.com, mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk, "Lucas Mateus Castro \(alqotel\)" , pc@us.ibm.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br, clg@kaod.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Added tests for the mtfsf to check if FI bit of FPSCR is being set and if exception calls are being made correctly. Signed-off-by: Lucas Mateus Castro (alqotel) Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- tests/tcg/ppc64/Makefile.target | 1 + tests/tcg/ppc64le/Makefile.target | 1 + tests/tcg/ppc64le/mtfsf.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/tcg/ppc64le/mtfsf.c diff --git a/tests/tcg/ppc64/Makefile.target b/tests/tcg/ppc64/Makefile.target index 6ab7934fdf..8f4c7ac4ed 100644 --- a/tests/tcg/ppc64/Makefile.target +++ b/tests/tcg/ppc64/Makefile.target @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ endif bcdsub: CFLAGS += -mpower8-vector PPC64_TESTS += byte_reverse +PPC64_TESTS += mtfsf ifneq ($(DOCKER_IMAGE)$(CROSS_CC_HAS_POWER10),) run-byte_reverse: QEMU_OPTS+=-cpu POWER10 run-plugin-byte_reverse-with-%: QEMU_OPTS+=-cpu POWER10 diff --git a/tests/tcg/ppc64le/Makefile.target b/tests/tcg/ppc64le/Makefile.target index 5e65b1590d..b8cd9bf73a 100644 --- a/tests/tcg/ppc64le/Makefile.target +++ b/tests/tcg/ppc64le/Makefile.target @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ endif bcdsub: CFLAGS += -mpower8-vector PPC64LE_TESTS += byte_reverse +PPC64LE_TESTS += mtfsf ifneq ($(DOCKER_IMAGE)$(CROSS_CC_HAS_POWER10),) run-byte_reverse: QEMU_OPTS+=-cpu POWER10 run-plugin-byte_reverse-with-%: QEMU_OPTS+=-cpu POWER10 diff --git a/tests/tcg/ppc64le/mtfsf.c b/tests/tcg/ppc64le/mtfsf.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..b3d31f3637 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/tcg/ppc64le/mtfsf.c @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#define FPSCR_VE 7 /* Floating-point invalid operation exception enable */ +#define FPSCR_VXSOFT 10 /* Floating-point invalid operation exception (soft) */ +#define FPSCR_FI 17 /* Floating-point fraction inexact */ + +#define FP_VE (1ull << FPSCR_VE) +#define FP_VXSOFT (1ull << FPSCR_VXSOFT) +#define FP_FI (1ull << FPSCR_FI) + +void sigfpe_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *ucontext) +{ + if (si->si_code == FPE_FLTINV) { + exit(0); + } + exit(1); +} + +int main(void) +{ + union { + double d; + long long ll; + } fpscr; + + struct sigaction sa = { + .sa_sigaction = sigfpe_handler, + .sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO + }; + + /* + * Enable the MSR bits F0 and F1 to enable exceptions. + * This shouldn't be needed in linux-user as these bits are enabled by + * default, but this allows to execute either in a VM or a real machine + * to compare the behaviors. + */ + prctl(PR_SET_FPEXC, PR_FP_EXC_PRECISE); + + /* First test if the FI bit is being set correctly */ + fpscr.ll = FP_FI; + __builtin_mtfsf(0b11111111, fpscr.d); + fpscr.d = __builtin_mffs(); + assert((fpscr.ll & FP_FI) != 0); + + /* Then test if the deferred exception is being called correctly */ + sigaction(SIGFPE, &sa, NULL); + + /* + * Although the VXSOFT exception has been chosen, based on test in a Power9 + * any combination of exception bit + its enabling bit should work. + * But if a different exception is chosen si_code check should + * change accordingly. + */ + fpscr.ll = FP_VE | FP_VXSOFT; + __builtin_mtfsf(0b11111111, fpscr.d); + + return 1; +}