@@ -290,6 +290,17 @@ static inline void ppc_excp_apply_ail(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp_model, int excp,
#endif
}
+static void ppc_excp_toggle_ile(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong *new_msr)
+{
+#ifdef TARGET_PPC64
+ if (ppc_interrupts_little_endian(cpu, !!(*new_msr & MSR_HVB))) {
+ *new_msr |= (target_ulong)1 << MSR_LE;
+ } else {
+ *new_msr &= ~((target_ulong)1 << MSR_LE);
+ }
+#endif
+}
+
static inline void powerpc_set_excp_state(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
target_ulong vector, target_ulong msr)
{
@@ -756,18 +767,12 @@ static inline void powerpc_excp(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp)
}
/*
- * Sort out endianness of interrupt, this differs depending on the
- * CPU, the HV mode, etc...
+ * We preserve MSR_LE, but some CPUs can take interrupts in a
+ * different endianness.
*/
-#ifdef TARGET_PPC64
if (excp_model >= POWERPC_EXCP_970) {
- if (ppc_interrupts_little_endian(cpu, !!(new_msr & MSR_HVB))) {
- new_msr |= (target_ulong)1 << MSR_LE;
- } else {
- new_msr &= ~((target_ulong)1 << MSR_LE);
- }
+ ppc_excp_toggle_ile(cpu, &new_msr);
}
-#endif
#if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
if (excp_model == POWERPC_EXCP_BOOKE) {
Move the ILE code into a separate function similarly to what we do for AIL. This leaves the excp_model check behind because it will go away when we split powerpc_excp. Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com> --- target/ppc/excp_helper.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)