@@ -2138,6 +2138,7 @@ static bool bdrv_a_allow_b(BdrvChild *a, BdrvChild *b, Error **errp)
assert(a->bs);
assert(a->bs == b->bs);
+ assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
if ((b->perm & a->shared_perm) == b->perm) {
return true;
@@ -2161,6 +2162,7 @@ static bool bdrv_a_allow_b(BdrvChild *a, BdrvChild *b, Error **errp)
static bool bdrv_parent_perms_conflict(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
{
BdrvChild *a, *b;
+ assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
/*
* During the loop we'll look at each pair twice. That's correct because
@@ -2245,6 +2247,8 @@ static void bdrv_child_set_perm_abort(void *opaque)
{
BdrvChildSetPermState *s = opaque;
+ assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
+
s->child->perm = s->old_perm;
s->child->shared_perm = s->old_shared_perm;
}
@@ -2258,6 +2262,7 @@ static void bdrv_child_set_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm,
uint64_t shared, Transaction *tran)
{
BdrvChildSetPermState *s = g_new(BdrvChildSetPermState, 1);
+ assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
*s = (BdrvChildSetPermState) {
.child = c,
@@ -2442,6 +2447,7 @@ static int bdrv_node_refresh_perm(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockReopenQueue *q,
BdrvChild *c;
int ret;
uint64_t cumulative_perms, cumulative_shared_perms;
+ assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
bdrv_get_cumulative_perm(bs, &cumulative_perms, &cumulative_shared_perms);
@@ -2510,6 +2516,7 @@ static int bdrv_list_refresh_perms(GSList *list, BlockReopenQueue *q,
{
int ret;
BlockDriverState *bs;
+ assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
for ( ; list; list = list->next) {
bs = list->data;
@@ -2581,6 +2588,7 @@ static int bdrv_refresh_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
int ret;
Transaction *tran = tran_new();
g_autoptr(GSList) list = bdrv_topological_dfs(NULL, NULL, bs);
+ assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
ret = bdrv_list_refresh_perms(list, NULL, tran, errp);
tran_finalize(tran, ret);
@@ -2647,6 +2655,7 @@ static void bdrv_filter_default_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared,
uint64_t *nperm, uint64_t *nshared)
{
+ assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
*nperm = perm & DEFAULT_PERM_PASSTHROUGH;
*nshared = (shared & DEFAULT_PERM_PASSTHROUGH) | DEFAULT_PERM_UNCHANGED;
}
@@ -2658,6 +2667,7 @@ static void bdrv_default_perms_for_cow(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
uint64_t *nperm, uint64_t *nshared)
{
assert(role & BDRV_CHILD_COW);
+ assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
/*
* We want consistent read from backing files if the parent needs it.
@@ -2694,6 +2704,7 @@ static void bdrv_default_perms_for_storage(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
{
int flags;
+ assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
assert(role & (BDRV_CHILD_METADATA | BDRV_CHILD_DATA));
flags = bdrv_reopen_get_flags(reopen_queue, bs);
@@ -6090,6 +6101,7 @@ static void xdbg_graph_add_edge(XDbgBlockGraphConstructor *gr, void *parent,
{
BlockPermission qapi_perm;
XDbgBlockGraphEdge *edge;
+ assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
edge = g_new0(XDbgBlockGraphEdge, 1);
Now that we "covered" the three main cases where the permission API was being used under BQL (fuse, amend and invalidate_cache), we can safely assert for the permission functions implemented in block.c Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com> --- block.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)