From patchwork Fri Jun 24 15:40:59 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kevin Wolf X-Patchwork-Id: 12894828 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B41BDC433EF for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 16:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42944 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4lqF-0007XP-Mp for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:07:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41444) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4lRA-0006Y5-3N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 11:41:36 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:57598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4lR4-0000t1-SE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 11:41:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1656085290; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sd8VhQGWEpTDiSLevFE7jFgiFqnrOHTPUJ08CRqL42Q=; b=Mybk3CD+wh6ejTTPmXyZ6dIoH1pIyhT1mW84mEnuZ9ExfyFSQJ7l4QuL2/QDmyjoZ3dzmM yuZFsPM3jwUDQz+OID8I0683whjQ4q0TbOmzAJmSh/UIakzv6Pi0UL/OC6cUaHYC852Ty2 2oqfbxDrbCgiOHViB/+VNOFSNnBWCNA= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-443-ozyxvMWXMT2wDKgjsJRpkQ-1; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 11:41:28 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ozyxvMWXMT2wDKgjsJRpkQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90DAA101E986; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 15:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merkur.fritz.box (unknown [10.39.194.34]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF71D492C3B; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 15:41:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Kevin Wolf To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PULL v2 16/20] block/gluster: correctly set max_pdiscard Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:40:59 +0200 Message-Id: <20220624154103.185902-17-kwolf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20220624154103.185902-1-kwolf@redhat.com> References: <20220624154103.185902-1-kwolf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.9 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.082, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" From: Fabian Ebner On 64-bit platforms, assigning SIZE_MAX to the int64_t max_pdiscard results in a negative value, and the following assertion would trigger down the line (it's not the same max_pdiscard, but computed from the other one): qemu-system-x86_64: ../block/io.c:3166: bdrv_co_pdiscard: Assertion `max_pdiscard >= bs->bl.request_alignment' failed. On 32-bit platforms, it's fine to keep using SIZE_MAX. The assertion in qemu_gluster_co_pdiscard() is checking that the value of 'bytes' can safely be passed to glfs_discard_async(), which takes a size_t for the argument in question, so it is kept as is. And since max_pdiscard is still <= SIZE_MAX, relying on max_pdiscard is still fine. Fixes: 0c8022876f ("block: use int64_t instead of int in driver discard handlers") Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner Message-Id: <20220520075922.43972-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf --- block/gluster.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/gluster.c b/block/gluster.c index 398976bc66..b60213ab80 100644 --- a/block/gluster.c +++ b/block/gluster.c @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ out: static void qemu_gluster_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp) { bs->bl.max_transfer = GLUSTER_MAX_TRANSFER; - bs->bl.max_pdiscard = SIZE_MAX; + bs->bl.max_pdiscard = MIN(SIZE_MAX, INT64_MAX); } static int qemu_gluster_reopen_prepare(BDRVReopenState *state,