From patchwork Fri Sep 2 07:55:29 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Pierre Morel X-Patchwork-Id: 12963772 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2873ECAAA1 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 08:03:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60502 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oU1dl-0006NK-Gj for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 04:03:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oU1Wr-0005pt-Op; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 03:55:53 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:53358 helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oU1Wn-0002yv-GV; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 03:55:53 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2827l5hW001636; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:55:46 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=L90wxGJhXEcs60gaOIaDidG8422tLLQZxw5EtCGtuLg=; b=FeqrO/5jREjTVhctNZ+WwU7yGOvd9C4JDKUj5rS0fpa1dNS+JOAbXGp+cBBua+7wdjeB 9rukLkxmtx8cGUKJySXTswTYPCTQkvXG/zB1XmrhHhwOnsbayQxmOrfoOGZcyM6ZjAVt z39/9P86P7VSLPYDfgyXE/s0F7R5FDIKwrrY/yreKicRLs2MriEJguqi7HiH6XJ6Fj8g HFXj+w0YjzSOkqVAVDRbxH172UZQJMuC4L4WuKHr8YjHuTM6o/zc1D7SCxFi1UtQzT2x aGdoTX0VyFUgROKAf/Ql6Pq+4GN0o87mzCrwDFuGOfow9MteUk0h+uOsITNPLKOBurue mA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3jbdrdr7w9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 02 Sep 2022 07:55:46 +0000 Received: from m0098419.ppops.net (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2827m3k1004222; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:55:45 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3jbdrdr7vt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 02 Sep 2022 07:55:45 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 2827q3xd020246; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:55:43 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3j7aw8yubv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 02 Sep 2022 07:55:43 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 2827te9Q39846348 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:55:40 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A59711C050; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:55:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9C411C04C; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:55:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-c6ac47cc-293c-11b2-a85c-d421c8e4747b.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.171.69.137]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:55:39 +0000 (GMT) From: Pierre Morel To: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, ehabkost@redhat.com, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v9 08/10] target/s390x: interception of PTF instruction Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 09:55:29 +0200 Message-Id: <20220902075531.188916-9-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20220902075531.188916-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220902075531.188916-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: AwOK_-E6ZYY699iF8NzB1o5rCHacDrNK X-Proofpoint-GUID: ztvKFqvUr17_QzhPT6iVmnfrEu_U_YNe X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-09-01_12,2022-08-31_03,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2207270000 definitions=main-2209020034 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.158.5; envelope-from=pmorel@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" When the host supports the CPU topology facility, the PTF instruction with function code 2 is interpreted by the SIE, provided that the userland hypervizor activates the interpretation by using the KVM_CAP_S390_CPU_TOPOLOGY KVM extension. The PTF instructions with function code 0 and 1 are intercepted and must be emulated by the userland hypervizor. Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel Reviewed-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch --- hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h | 6 ++++ target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c | 13 ++++++++ 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c index b6bf839e40..7dcaa28ca3 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c +++ b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c @@ -20,6 +20,58 @@ #include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h" #include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h" #include "migration/vmstate.h" +#include "target/s390x/cpu.h" +#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h" + +/* + * s390_handle_ptf: + * + * @register 1: contains the function code + * + * Function codes 0 and 1 handle the CPU polarization. + * We assume an horizontal topology, the only one supported currently + * by Linux, consequently we answer to function code 0, requesting + * horizontal polarization that it is already the current polarization + * and reject vertical polarization request without further explanation. + * + * Function code 2 is handling topology changes and is interpreted + * by the SIE. + */ +void s390_handle_ptf(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uintptr_t ra) +{ + CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env; + uint64_t reg = env->regs[r1]; + uint8_t fc = reg & S390_TOPO_FC_MASK; + + if (!s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_CONFIGURATION_TOPOLOGY)) { + s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_OPERATION, ra); + return; + } + + if (env->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) { + s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_PRIVILEGED, ra); + return; + } + + if (reg & ~S390_TOPO_FC_MASK) { + s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra); + return; + } + + switch (fc) { + case 0: /* Horizontal polarization is already set */ + env->regs[r1] |= S390_PTF_REASON_DONE; + setcc(cpu, 2); + break; + case 1: /* Vertical polarization is not supported */ + env->regs[r1] |= S390_PTF_REASON_NONE; + setcc(cpu, 2); + break; + default: + /* Note that fc == 2 is interpreted by the SIE */ + s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra); + } +} S390Topology *s390_get_topology(void) { diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h b/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h index 8a0090a071..9e7a0d75bc 100644 --- a/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h +++ b/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h @@ -31,6 +31,12 @@ struct S390CcwMachineState { uint8_t loadparm[8]; }; +#define S390_PTF_REASON_NONE (0x00 << 8) +#define S390_PTF_REASON_DONE (0x01 << 8) +#define S390_PTF_REASON_BUSY (0x02 << 8) +#define S390_TOPO_FC_MASK 0xffUL +void s390_handle_ptf(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uintptr_t ra); + struct S390CcwMachineClass { /*< private >*/ MachineClass parent_class; diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c index 9c994d27d5..cb14bcc012 100644 --- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c +++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ #define PRIV_B9_EQBS 0x9c #define PRIV_B9_CLP 0xa0 +#define PRIV_B9_PTF 0xa2 #define PRIV_B9_PCISTG 0xd0 #define PRIV_B9_PCILG 0xd2 #define PRIV_B9_RPCIT 0xd3 @@ -1463,6 +1464,15 @@ static int kvm_mpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run) } } +static int kvm_handle_ptf(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run) +{ + uint8_t r1 = (run->s390_sieic.ipb >> 20) & 0x0f; + + s390_handle_ptf(cpu, r1, RA_IGNORED); + + return 0; +} + static int handle_b9(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run, uint8_t ipa1) { int r = 0; @@ -1480,6 +1490,9 @@ static int handle_b9(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run, uint8_t ipa1) case PRIV_B9_RPCIT: r = kvm_rpcit_service_call(cpu, run); break; + case PRIV_B9_PTF: + r = kvm_handle_ptf(cpu, run); + break; case PRIV_B9_EQBS: /* just inject exception */ r = -1;