From patchwork Wed May 3 17:21:19 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: David Hildenbrand X-Patchwork-Id: 13230412 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2186CC77B7F for ; Wed, 3 May 2023 17:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puGAa-0006Qc-IT; Wed, 03 May 2023 13:21:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puGAV-0006Ia-Ha for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2023 13:21:31 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puGAT-0004Tt-EV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2023 13:21:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1683134488; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xFu4ytGkVgX4Gnb/N3UL2IopJdjRQOhcDrcelPnnYHw=; b=YUrfo4HTW/DcNQFDR0536/sv6pPaxNecA52XM6gLlK6w912tARbwIuE5WCHGTtv+zYSyIY m0vJT6EdQ9O/SBkdp1OjzkNO8VOlYiU3sLNMA1rAo0w259EHmpUElVdc0AJKSLFENQWL6S L5BdUeb0RgaRxi8KZgAss26vOBxBUpw= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-478-qhp1Gfv3OiK8XJx4Iu4T8Q-1; Wed, 03 May 2023 13:21:27 -0400 X-MC-Unique: qhp1Gfv3OiK8XJx4Iu4T8Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B96E85A588; Wed, 3 May 2023 17:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t480s.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.162]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A890C15BAD; Wed, 3 May 2023 17:21:24 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: David Hildenbrand , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Stefan Hajnoczi , Igor Mammedov , Paolo Bonzini , Peter Xu , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Tiwei Bie Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] vhost: Rework memslot filtering and fix "used_memslot" tracking Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 19:21:19 +0200 Message-Id: <20230503172121.733642-2-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20230503172121.733642-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20230503172121.733642-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.8 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=david@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -22 X-Spam_score: -2.3 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.161, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Having multiple vhost devices, some filtering out fd-less memslots and some not, can mess up the "used_memslot" accounting. Consequently our "free memslot" checks become unreliable and we might run out of free memslots at runtime later. An example sequence which can trigger a potential issue that involves different vhost backends (vhost-kernel and vhost-user) and hotplugged memory devices can be found at [1]. Let's make the filtering mechanism less generic and distinguish between backends that support private memslots (without a fd) and ones that only support shared memslots (with a fd). Track the used_memslots for both cases separately and use the corresponding value when required. Note: Most probably we should filter out MAP_PRIVATE fd-based RAM regions (for example, via memory-backend-memfd,...,shared=off or as default with memory-backend-file) as well. When not using MAP_SHARED, it might not work as expected. Add a TODO for now. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/fad9136f-08d3-3fd9-71a1-502069c000cf@redhat.com Fixes: 988a27754bbb ("vhost: allow backends to filter memory sections") Cc: Tiwei Bie Acked-by: Igor Mammedov Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 7 ++-- hw/virtio/vhost.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- include/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.h | 5 ++- 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c index e5285df4ba..0c3e2702b1 100644 --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c @@ -2453,10 +2453,9 @@ vhost_user_crypto_close_session(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint64_t session_id) return 0; } -static bool vhost_user_mem_section_filter(struct vhost_dev *dev, - MemoryRegionSection *section) +static bool vhost_user_no_private_memslots(struct vhost_dev *dev) { - return memory_region_get_fd(section->mr) >= 0; + return true; } static int vhost_user_get_inflight_fd(struct vhost_dev *dev, @@ -2686,6 +2685,7 @@ const VhostOps user_ops = { .vhost_backend_init = vhost_user_backend_init, .vhost_backend_cleanup = vhost_user_backend_cleanup, .vhost_backend_memslots_limit = vhost_user_memslots_limit, + .vhost_backend_no_private_memslots = vhost_user_no_private_memslots, .vhost_set_log_base = vhost_user_set_log_base, .vhost_set_mem_table = vhost_user_set_mem_table, .vhost_set_vring_addr = vhost_user_set_vring_addr, @@ -2712,7 +2712,6 @@ const VhostOps user_ops = { .vhost_set_config = vhost_user_set_config, .vhost_crypto_create_session = vhost_user_crypto_create_session, .vhost_crypto_close_session = vhost_user_crypto_close_session, - .vhost_backend_mem_section_filter = vhost_user_mem_section_filter, .vhost_get_inflight_fd = vhost_user_get_inflight_fd, .vhost_set_inflight_fd = vhost_user_set_inflight_fd, .vhost_dev_start = vhost_user_dev_start, diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c index 746d130c74..4fe08c809f 100644 --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c @@ -46,20 +46,33 @@ static struct vhost_log *vhost_log; static struct vhost_log *vhost_log_shm; +/* Memslots used by backends that support private memslots (without an fd). */ static unsigned int used_memslots; + +/* Memslots used by backends that only support shared memslots (with an fd). */ +static unsigned int used_shared_memslots; + static QLIST_HEAD(, vhost_dev) vhost_devices = QLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(vhost_devices); bool vhost_has_free_slot(void) { - unsigned int slots_limit = ~0U; + unsigned int free = UINT_MAX; struct vhost_dev *hdev; QLIST_FOREACH(hdev, &vhost_devices, entry) { unsigned int r = hdev->vhost_ops->vhost_backend_memslots_limit(hdev); - slots_limit = MIN(slots_limit, r); + unsigned int cur_free; + + if (hdev->vhost_ops->vhost_backend_no_private_memslots && + hdev->vhost_ops->vhost_backend_no_private_memslots(hdev)) { + cur_free = r - used_shared_memslots; + } else { + cur_free = r - used_memslots; + } + free = MIN(free, cur_free); } - return slots_limit > used_memslots; + return free > 1; } static void vhost_dev_sync_region(struct vhost_dev *dev, @@ -475,8 +488,7 @@ static int vhost_verify_ring_mappings(struct vhost_dev *dev, * vhost_section: identify sections needed for vhost access * * We only care about RAM sections here (where virtqueue and guest - * internals accessed by virtio might live). If we find one we still - * allow the backend to potentially filter it out of our list. + * internals accessed by virtio might live). */ static bool vhost_section(struct vhost_dev *dev, MemoryRegionSection *section) { @@ -503,8 +515,16 @@ static bool vhost_section(struct vhost_dev *dev, MemoryRegionSection *section) return false; } - if (dev->vhost_ops->vhost_backend_mem_section_filter && - !dev->vhost_ops->vhost_backend_mem_section_filter(dev, section)) { + /* + * Some backends (like vhost-user) can only handle memory regions + * that have an fd (can be mapped into a different process). Filter + * the ones without an fd out, if requested. + * + * TODO: we might have to limit to MAP_SHARED as well. + */ + if (memory_region_get_fd(section->mr) < 0 && + dev->vhost_ops->vhost_backend_no_private_memslots && + dev->vhost_ops->vhost_backend_no_private_memslots(dev)) { trace_vhost_reject_section(mr->name, 2); return false; } @@ -569,7 +589,14 @@ static void vhost_commit(MemoryListener *listener) dev->n_mem_sections * sizeof dev->mem->regions[0]; dev->mem = g_realloc(dev->mem, regions_size); dev->mem->nregions = dev->n_mem_sections; - used_memslots = dev->mem->nregions; + + if (dev->vhost_ops->vhost_backend_no_private_memslots && + dev->vhost_ops->vhost_backend_no_private_memslots(dev)) { + used_shared_memslots = dev->mem->nregions; + } else { + used_memslots = dev->mem->nregions; + } + for (i = 0; i < dev->n_mem_sections; i++) { struct vhost_memory_region *cur_vmr = dev->mem->regions + i; struct MemoryRegionSection *mrs = dev->mem_sections + i; @@ -1387,6 +1414,7 @@ int vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *hdev, void *opaque, VhostBackendType backend_type, uint32_t busyloop_timeout, Error **errp) { + unsigned int used; uint64_t features; int i, r, n_initialized_vqs = 0; @@ -1482,7 +1510,17 @@ int vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *hdev, void *opaque, memory_listener_register(&hdev->memory_listener, &address_space_memory); QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&vhost_devices, hdev, entry); - if (used_memslots > hdev->vhost_ops->vhost_backend_memslots_limit(hdev)) { + /* + * The listener we registered properly updated the corresponding counter. + * So we can trust that these values are accurate. + */ + if (hdev->vhost_ops->vhost_backend_no_private_memslots && + hdev->vhost_ops->vhost_backend_no_private_memslots(hdev)) { + used = used_shared_memslots; + } else { + used = used_memslots; + } + if (used > hdev->vhost_ops->vhost_backend_memslots_limit(hdev)) { error_setg(errp, "vhost backend memory slots limit is less" " than current number of present memory slots"); r = -EINVAL; diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.h b/include/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.h index ec3fbae58d..2349a4a7d2 100644 --- a/include/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.h +++ b/include/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.h @@ -108,8 +108,7 @@ typedef int (*vhost_crypto_create_session_op)(struct vhost_dev *dev, typedef int (*vhost_crypto_close_session_op)(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint64_t session_id); -typedef bool (*vhost_backend_mem_section_filter_op)(struct vhost_dev *dev, - MemoryRegionSection *section); +typedef bool (*vhost_backend_no_private_memslots_op)(struct vhost_dev *dev); typedef int (*vhost_get_inflight_fd_op)(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_size, @@ -138,6 +137,7 @@ typedef struct VhostOps { vhost_backend_init vhost_backend_init; vhost_backend_cleanup vhost_backend_cleanup; vhost_backend_memslots_limit vhost_backend_memslots_limit; + vhost_backend_no_private_memslots_op vhost_backend_no_private_memslots; vhost_net_set_backend_op vhost_net_set_backend; vhost_net_set_mtu_op vhost_net_set_mtu; vhost_scsi_set_endpoint_op vhost_scsi_set_endpoint; @@ -172,7 +172,6 @@ typedef struct VhostOps { vhost_set_config_op vhost_set_config; vhost_crypto_create_session_op vhost_crypto_create_session; vhost_crypto_close_session_op vhost_crypto_close_session; - vhost_backend_mem_section_filter_op vhost_backend_mem_section_filter; vhost_get_inflight_fd_op vhost_get_inflight_fd; vhost_set_inflight_fd_op vhost_set_inflight_fd; vhost_dev_start_op vhost_dev_start;