From patchwork Tue May 23 18:59:15 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: David Hildenbrand X-Patchwork-Id: 13252802 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95760C77B75 for ; Tue, 23 May 2023 19:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q1XEL-00033A-Jd; Tue, 23 May 2023 14:59:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q1XEK-00032m-21 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2023 14:59:32 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q1XEG-0001uk-BV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2023 14:59:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1684868367; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BQjzDKtj7AG+IRj7KiSOtHvCiOH9HB4kso6i9Vr4d2g=; b=G6vGgAjjyzbNgcbEJpsyR1PbgdeTC9oPRk7u4ohQSgDthB2j16DDY/CTiPHMHru4yDaDd8 pnUYO0SxpuRpAqufz/9xv7nehPUpyCIj0fzKtnZ8jWAnAiAWDLengTROjtaMzsvHSihShi l0X28a2DbLi3HNi7R9uYoVQABDrQp9E= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-547-bIWQqPGvNn2quZOYxpR93Q-1; Tue, 23 May 2023 14:59:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: bIWQqPGvNn2quZOYxpR93Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58F68811E85; Tue, 23 May 2023 18:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t480s.fritz.box (unknown [10.39.194.191]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3231492B0A; Tue, 23 May 2023 18:59:22 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: David Hildenbrand , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Stefan Hajnoczi , Igor Mammedov , Paolo Bonzini , Peter Xu , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] softmmu/physmem: Fixup qemu_ram_block_from_host() documentation Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 20:59:15 +0200 Message-Id: <20230523185915.540373-4-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20230523185915.540373-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20230523185915.540373-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.10 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=david@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Let's fixup the documentation (e.g., removing traces of the ram_addr parameter that no longer exists) and move it to the header file while at it. Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov Acked-by: Igor Mammedov Reviewed-by: Peter Xu Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé --- include/exec/cpu-common.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ softmmu/physmem.c | 17 ----------------- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/exec/cpu-common.h b/include/exec/cpu-common.h index e5a55ede5f..1fd0549850 100644 --- a/include/exec/cpu-common.h +++ b/include/exec/cpu-common.h @@ -76,6 +76,21 @@ void qemu_ram_remap(ram_addr_t addr, ram_addr_t length); ram_addr_t qemu_ram_addr_from_host(void *ptr); ram_addr_t qemu_ram_addr_from_host_nofail(void *ptr); RAMBlock *qemu_ram_block_by_name(const char *name); + +/* + * Translates a host ptr back to a RAMBlock and an offset in that RAMBlock. + * + * @ptr: The host pointer to transalte. + * @round_offset: Whether to round the result offset down to a target page + * @offset: Will be set to the offset within the returned RAMBlock. + * + * Returns: RAMBlock (or NULL if not found) + * + * By the time this function returns, the returned pointer is not protected + * by RCU anymore. If the caller is not within an RCU critical section and + * does not hold the iothread lock, it must have other means of protecting the + * pointer, such as a reference to the memory region that owns the RAMBlock. + */ RAMBlock *qemu_ram_block_from_host(void *ptr, bool round_offset, ram_addr_t *offset); ram_addr_t qemu_ram_block_host_offset(RAMBlock *rb, void *host); diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c index efaed36773..1630ff6b34 100644 --- a/softmmu/physmem.c +++ b/softmmu/physmem.c @@ -2169,23 +2169,6 @@ ram_addr_t qemu_ram_block_host_offset(RAMBlock *rb, void *host) return res; } -/* - * Translates a host ptr back to a RAMBlock, a ram_addr and an offset - * in that RAMBlock. - * - * ptr: Host pointer to look up - * round_offset: If true round the result offset down to a page boundary - * *ram_addr: set to result ram_addr - * *offset: set to result offset within the RAMBlock - * - * Returns: RAMBlock (or NULL if not found) - * - * By the time this function returns, the returned pointer is not protected - * by RCU anymore. If the caller is not within an RCU critical section and - * does not hold the iothread lock, it must have other means of protecting the - * pointer, such as a reference to the region that includes the incoming - * ram_addr_t. - */ RAMBlock *qemu_ram_block_from_host(void *ptr, bool round_offset, ram_addr_t *offset) {