From patchwork Thu May 25 18:02:13 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Andrey Drobyshev X-Patchwork-Id: 13255543 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32C7BC77B7E for ; Thu, 25 May 2023 18:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q2FIM-0003hN-9x; Thu, 25 May 2023 14:02:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q2FI4-0003bW-NY; Thu, 25 May 2023 14:02:20 -0400 Received: from relay.virtuozzo.com ([130.117.225.111]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q2FI1-0003J7-QG; Thu, 25 May 2023 14:02:20 -0400 Received: from dev005.ch-qa.vzint.dev ([172.29.1.10]) by relay.virtuozzo.com with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1q2FGW-002Ggr-1y; Thu, 25 May 2023 20:02:12 +0200 To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, shmuel.eiderman@oracle.com, andrey.drobyshev@virtuozzo.com, den@virtuozzo.com Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] qemu-iotests: 024: add rebasing test case for overlay_size > backing_size Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 21:02:13 +0300 Message-Id: <20230525180213.902012-3-andrey.drobyshev@virtuozzo.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20230525180213.902012-1-andrey.drobyshev@virtuozzo.com> References: <20230525180213.902012-1-andrey.drobyshev@virtuozzo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=130.117.225.111; envelope-from=andrey.drobyshev@virtuozzo.com; helo=relay.virtuozzo.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Andrey Drobyshev X-Patchwork-Original-From: Andrey Drobyshev via From: Andrey Drobyshev Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Before previous commit, rebase was getting infitely stuck in case of rebasing within the same backing chain and when overlay_size > backing_size. Let's add this case to the rebasing test 024 to make sure it doesn't break again. Signed-off-by: Andrey Drobyshev Reviewed-by: Denis V. Lunev --- tests/qemu-iotests/024 | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tests/qemu-iotests/024.out | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/024 b/tests/qemu-iotests/024 index 25a564a150..98a7c8fd65 100755 --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/024 +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/024 @@ -199,6 +199,63 @@ echo # $BASE_OLD and $BASE_NEW) $QEMU_IMG map "$OVERLAY" | _filter_qemu_img_map +# Check that rebase within the chain is working when +# overlay_size > old_backing_size +# +# base_new <-- base_old <-- overlay +# +# Backing (new): 11 11 11 11 11 +# Backing (old): 22 22 22 22 +# Overlay: -- -- -- -- -- +# +# As a result, overlay should contain data identical to base_old, with the +# last cluster remaining unallocated. + +echo +echo "=== Test rebase within one backing chain ===" +echo + +echo "Creating backing chain" +echo + +TEST_IMG=$BASE_NEW _make_test_img $(( CLUSTER_SIZE * 5 )) +TEST_IMG=$BASE_OLD _make_test_img -b "$BASE_NEW" -F $IMGFMT \ + $(( CLUSTER_SIZE * 4 )) +TEST_IMG=$OVERLAY _make_test_img -b "$BASE_OLD" -F $IMGFMT \ + $(( CLUSTER_SIZE * 5 )) + +echo +echo "Fill backing files with data" +echo + +$QEMU_IO "$BASE_NEW" -c "write -P 0x11 0 $(( CLUSTER_SIZE * 5 ))" \ + | _filter_qemu_io +$QEMU_IO "$BASE_OLD" -c "write -P 0x22 0 $(( CLUSTER_SIZE * 4 ))" \ + | _filter_qemu_io + +echo +echo "Check the last cluster is zeroed in overlay before the rebase" +echo +$QEMU_IO "$OVERLAY" -c "read -P 0x00 $(( CLUSTER_SIZE * 4 )) $CLUSTER_SIZE" \ + | _filter_qemu_io + +echo +echo "Rebase onto another image in the same chain" +echo + +$QEMU_IMG rebase -b "$BASE_NEW" -F $IMGFMT "$OVERLAY" + +echo "Verify that data is read the same before and after rebase" +echo + +# Verify the first 4 clusters are still read the same as in the old base +$QEMU_IO "$OVERLAY" -c "read -P 0x22 0 $(( CLUSTER_SIZE * 4 ))" \ + | _filter_qemu_io +# Verify the last cluster still reads as zeroes +$QEMU_IO "$OVERLAY" -c "read -P 0x00 $(( CLUSTER_SIZE * 4 )) $CLUSTER_SIZE" \ + | _filter_qemu_io + +echo # success, all done echo "*** done" diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/024.out b/tests/qemu-iotests/024.out index 973a5a3711..245fe8b1d1 100644 --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/024.out +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/024.out @@ -171,4 +171,34 @@ read 65536/65536 bytes at offset 196608 Offset Length File 0 0x30000 TEST_DIR/subdir/t.IMGFMT 0x30000 0x10000 TEST_DIR/subdir/t.IMGFMT.base_new + +=== Test rebase within one backing chain === + +Creating backing chain + +Formatting 'TEST_DIR/subdir/t.IMGFMT.base_new', fmt=IMGFMT size=327680 +Formatting 'TEST_DIR/subdir/t.IMGFMT.base_old', fmt=IMGFMT size=262144 backing_file=TEST_DIR/subdir/t.IMGFMT.base_new backing_fmt=IMGFMT +Formatting 'TEST_DIR/subdir/t.IMGFMT', fmt=IMGFMT size=327680 backing_file=TEST_DIR/subdir/t.IMGFMT.base_old backing_fmt=IMGFMT + +Fill backing files with data + +wrote 327680/327680 bytes at offset 0 +320 KiB, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) +wrote 262144/262144 bytes at offset 0 +256 KiB, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) + +Check the last cluster is zeroed in overlay before the rebase + +read 65536/65536 bytes at offset 262144 +64 KiB, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) + +Rebase onto another image in the same chain + +Verify that data is read the same before and after rebase + +read 262144/262144 bytes at offset 0 +256 KiB, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) +read 65536/65536 bytes at offset 262144 +64 KiB, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) + *** done