From patchwork Thu Sep 14 07:21:48 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zhao Liu X-Patchwork-Id: 13384744 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7F27EDE987 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 07:14:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qggWO-0003CD-LY; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 03:12:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qggWH-000395-Tq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 03:12:10 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qggWE-0006E8-V6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 03:12:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1694675526; x=1726211526; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=afjBe2mVMzV33bzwxPjMsC7f0TmuhUW5vr/qRgdM9p0=; b=dqkLaQBAvjvGrexY1QkgLV1XP8rxYdpnxZDFfL7jas0nt0E1DOP1A1En 4uV9EGnXyvNevsM8zG9veG2VVLkVea+o/g4tE4vgZJUlBs9E0z8tNCYeP haRt72mr+dSaGM/sjtZZsBf3Ta4gYS4p3sMCNwztlCR7FVrruZQYia+N9 GkLuEyd+OihjlhObmaYHcgHFlMLjE9SibxoCzyk9kzQE67PqATdYvvlYw CpUneNh/XMSpzeUqpqreYohdNXS/lLdmHRaLwjVVbWXUNayFq7tL7Po27 Tv9CDOyKGTrxblWGBd5dN591g/ED1hHFmwe1gHGQaViMBVreKyQkUhgsx g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10832"; a="359136284" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,145,1688454000"; d="scan'208";a="359136284" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2023 00:11:56 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10832"; a="779526551" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,145,1688454000"; d="scan'208";a="779526551" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com ([10.239.160.36]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2023 00:11:53 -0700 From: Zhao Liu To: Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-D?= =?utf-8?q?aud=C3=A9?= , Yanan Wang , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Richard Henderson , Paolo Bonzini , Marcelo Tosatti Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Zhenyu Wang , Xiaoyao Li , Babu Moger , Zhao Liu , Zhuocheng Ding Subject: [PATCH v4 10/21] i386: Introduce module-level cpu topology to CPUX86State Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 15:21:48 +0800 Message-Id: <20230914072159.1177582-11-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230914072159.1177582-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> References: <20230914072159.1177582-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: none client-ip=192.55.52.151; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org From: Zhuocheng Ding smp command has the "clusters" parameter but x86 hasn't supported that level. "cluster" is a CPU topology level concept above cores, in which the cores may share some resources (L2 cache or some others like L3 cache tags, depending on the Archs) [1][2]. For x86, the resource shared by cores at the cluster level is mainly the L2 cache. However, using cluster to define x86's L2 cache topology will cause the compatibility problem: Currently, x86 defaults that the L2 cache is shared in one core, which actually implies a default setting "cores per L2 cache is 1" and therefore implicitly defaults to having as many L2 caches as cores. For example (i386 PC machine): -smp 16,sockets=2,dies=2,cores=2,threads=2,maxcpus=16 (*) Considering the topology of the L2 cache, this (*) implicitly means "1 core per L2 cache" and "2 L2 caches per die". If we use cluster to configure L2 cache topology with the new default setting "clusters per L2 cache is 1", the above semantics will change to "2 cores per cluster" and "1 cluster per L2 cache", that is, "2 cores per L2 cache". So the same command (*) will cause changes in the L2 cache topology, further affecting the performance of the virtual machine. Therefore, x86 should only treat cluster as a cpu topology level and avoid using it to change L2 cache by default for compatibility. "cluster" in smp is the CPU topology level which is between "core" and die. For x86, the "cluster" in smp is corresponding to the module level [2], which is above the core level. So use the "module" other than "cluster" in i386 code. And please note that x86 already has a cpu topology level also named "cluster" [3], this level is at the upper level of the package. Here, the cluster in x86 cpu topology is completely different from the "clusters" as the smp parameter. After the module level is introduced, the cluster as the smp parameter will actually refer to the module level of x86. [1]: 864c3b5c32f0 ("hw/core/machine: Introduce CPU cluster topology support") [2]: Yanan's comment about "cluster", https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-02/msg04051.html [3]: SDM, vol.3, ch.9, 9.9.1 Hierarchical Mapping of Shared Resources. Signed-off-by: Zhuocheng Ding Co-developed-by: Zhao Liu Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin --- Changes since v1: * The background of the introduction of the "cluster" parameter and its exact meaning were revised according to Yanan's explanation. (Yanan) --- hw/i386/x86.c | 1 + target/i386/cpu.c | 1 + target/i386/cpu.h | 5 +++++ 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/i386/x86.c b/hw/i386/x86.c index f034df8bf628..9c61b6882b99 100644 --- a/hw/i386/x86.c +++ b/hw/i386/x86.c @@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ void x86_cpu_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, init_topo_info(&topo_info, x86ms); env->nr_dies = ms->smp.dies; + env->nr_modules = ms->smp.clusters; /* * If APIC ID is not set, diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c index 10e11c85f459..401409c5db08 100644 --- a/target/i386/cpu.c +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c @@ -7696,6 +7696,7 @@ static void x86_cpu_initfn(Object *obj) CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env; env->nr_dies = 1; + env->nr_modules = 1; cpu_set_cpustate_pointers(cpu); object_property_add(obj, "feature-words", "X86CPUFeatureWordInfo", diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h index 470257b92240..556e80f29764 100644 --- a/target/i386/cpu.h +++ b/target/i386/cpu.h @@ -1903,6 +1903,11 @@ typedef struct CPUArchState { /* Number of dies within this CPU package. */ unsigned nr_dies; + /* + * Number of modules within this CPU package. + * Module level in x86 cpu topology is corresponding to smp.clusters. + */ + unsigned nr_modules; } CPUX86State; struct kvm_msrs;