From patchwork Tue Sep 26 10:04:07 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Salil Mehta X-Patchwork-Id: 13399001 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 331E6E7D271 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 10:08:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ql4z6-0007a0-Cd; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 06:08:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ql4z4-0007X1-Aq; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 06:08:02 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ql4z2-0004FN-BU; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 06:08:01 -0400 Received: from lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4RvwPw2W0pz6K5sX; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 18:06:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from A190218597.china.huawei.com (10.126.174.16) by lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:07:39 +0100 To: , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH RFC V2 08/37] arm/virt: Init PMU at host for all possible vcpus Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:04:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20230926100436.28284-9-salil.mehta@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.3 In-Reply-To: <20230926100436.28284-1-salil.mehta@huawei.com> References: <20230926100436.28284-1-salil.mehta@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.126.174.16] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.176.79.56; envelope-from=salil.mehta@huawei.com; helo=frasgout.his.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Salil Mehta X-Patchwork-Original-From: Salil Mehta via From: Salil Mehta Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org PMU for all possible vCPUs must be initialized at the VM initialization time. Refactor existing code to accomodate possible vCPUs. This also assumes that all processor being used are identical. Past discussion for reference: Link: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-06/msg00131.html Co-developed-by: Salil Mehta Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta Co-developed-by: Keqian Zhu Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta --- hw/arm/virt.c | 12 ++++++++---- include/hw/arm/virt.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c index a208b4e517..070c36054e 100644 --- a/hw/arm/virt.c +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c @@ -1960,12 +1960,14 @@ static void finalize_gic_version(VirtMachineState *vms) */ static void virt_cpu_post_init(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *sysmem) { + CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus = vms->parent.possible_cpus; int max_cpus = MACHINE(vms)->smp.max_cpus; - bool aarch64, pmu, steal_time; + bool aarch64, steal_time; CPUState *cpu; + int n; aarch64 = object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(first_cpu), "aarch64", NULL); - pmu = object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(first_cpu), "pmu", NULL); + vms->pmu = object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(first_cpu), "pmu", NULL); steal_time = object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(first_cpu), "kvm-steal-time", NULL); @@ -1992,8 +1994,10 @@ static void virt_cpu_post_init(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *sysmem) memory_region_add_subregion(sysmem, pvtime_reg_base, pvtime); } - CPU_FOREACH(cpu) { - if (pmu) { + for (n = 0; n < possible_cpus->len; n++) { + cpu = qemu_get_possible_cpu(n); + + if (vms->pmu) { assert(arm_feature(&ARM_CPU(cpu)->env, ARM_FEATURE_PMU)); if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) { kvm_arm_pmu_set_irq(cpu, PPI(VIRTUAL_PMU_IRQ)); diff --git a/include/hw/arm/virt.h b/include/hw/arm/virt.h index 098c7917a4..fc0469c33f 100644 --- a/include/hw/arm/virt.h +++ b/include/hw/arm/virt.h @@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ struct VirtMachineState { bool ras; bool mte; bool dtb_randomness; + bool pmu; OnOffAuto acpi; VirtGICType gic_version; VirtIOMMUType iommu;