From patchwork Wed Oct 11 19:43:52 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Salil Mehta X-Patchwork-Id: 13417881 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F32C2CDB482 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 19:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qqfAI-0005tW-LP; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 15:46:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qqfAB-0005Ty-0Z; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 15:46:35 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qqfA8-0000ih-Vs; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 15:46:34 -0400 Received: from lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4S5NYX72T1z67H66; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 03:46:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from A190218597.china.huawei.com (10.126.169.226) by lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 20:46:12 +0100 To: , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH V5 6/9] hw/acpi: Update GED _EVT method AML with CPU scan Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 20:43:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20231011194355.15628-7-salil.mehta@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.3 In-Reply-To: <20231011194355.15628-1-salil.mehta@huawei.com> References: <20231011194355.15628-1-salil.mehta@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.126.169.226] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.176.79.56; envelope-from=salil.mehta@huawei.com; helo=frasgout.his.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Salil Mehta X-Patchwork-Original-From: Salil Mehta via From: Salil Mehta Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org OSPM evaluates _EVT method to map the event. The CPU hotplug event eventually results in start of the CPU scan. Scan figures out the CPU and the kind of event(plug/unplug) and notifies it back to the guest. Update the GED AML _EVT method with the call to \\_SB.CPUS.CSCN Also, macro CPU_SCAN_METHOD might be referred in other places like during GED intialization so it makes sense to have its definition placed in some common header file like cpu_hotplug.h. But doing this can cause compilation break because of the conflicting macro definitions present in cpu.c and cpu_hotplug.c and because both these files get compiled due to historic reasons of x86 world i.e. decision to use legacy(GPE.2)/modern(GED) CPU hotplug interface happens during runtime [1]. To mitigate above, for now, declare a new common macro ACPI_CPU_SCAN_METHOD for CPU scan method instead. (This needs a separate discussion later on for clean-up) Reference: [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/1463496205-251412-24-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com/ Co-developed-by: Keqian Zhu Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri --- hw/acpi/cpu.c | 2 +- hw/acpi/generic_event_device.c | 4 ++++ include/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/acpi/cpu.c b/hw/acpi/cpu.c index 66a71660ec..d7d7b5b8d2 100644 --- a/hw/acpi/cpu.c +++ b/hw/acpi/cpu.c @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_cpu_hotplug = { #define CPUHP_RES_DEVICE "PRES" #define CPU_LOCK "CPLK" #define CPU_STS_METHOD "CSTA" -#define CPU_SCAN_METHOD "CSCN" +#define CPU_SCAN_METHOD ACPI_CPU_SCAN_METHOD #define CPU_NOTIFY_METHOD "CTFY" #define CPU_EJECT_METHOD "CEJ0" #define CPU_OST_METHOD "COST" diff --git a/hw/acpi/generic_event_device.c b/hw/acpi/generic_event_device.c index d2fa1d0e4a..62d504d231 100644 --- a/hw/acpi/generic_event_device.c +++ b/hw/acpi/generic_event_device.c @@ -108,6 +108,10 @@ void build_ged_aml(Aml *table, const char *name, HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, aml_append(if_ctx, aml_call0(MEMORY_DEVICES_CONTAINER "." MEMORY_SLOT_SCAN_METHOD)); break; + case ACPI_GED_CPU_HOTPLUG_EVT: + aml_append(if_ctx, aml_call0(ACPI_CPU_CONTAINER "." + ACPI_CPU_SCAN_METHOD)); + break; case ACPI_GED_PWR_DOWN_EVT: aml_append(if_ctx, aml_notify(aml_name(ACPI_POWER_BUTTON_DEVICE), diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.h b/include/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.h index 48b291e45e..ef631750b4 100644 --- a/include/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.h +++ b/include/hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.h @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ #include "hw/acpi/cpu.h" #define ACPI_CPU_HOTPLUG_REG_LEN 12 +#define ACPI_CPU_SCAN_METHOD "CSCN" +#define ACPI_CPU_CONTAINER "\\_SB.CPUS" typedef struct AcpiCpuHotplug { Object *device;